Multi-Center PAMPA Study (PAMPA)

March 24, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Preventing Arthritis in a Multi-Center Psoriasis At-Risk Cohort

This is a multi-center (North-America), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, wait-list, interventional, preventive trial of guselkumab in high-risk psoriasis patients compared to non-biologic standard of care.

The primary objective of the proposed trial will be to test the hypothesis that a prolonged, unresolved skin inflammation coupled with musculoskeletal power-doppler ultrasound (MSKPDUS) abnormalities driven by IL-23 increase the risk for transition into PsA and that an intervention that targets one of these pivotal molecules (i.e., Guselkumab) will:

  1. Diminish MSKPDUS findings at 24 weeks, and
  2. Significantly reduce or prevent the emergence of synovio-enthesial phenotype at year 2.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

176

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1C 5B8
        • Recruiting
        • Memorial University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Proton Rahman, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wayne Gulliver, MD, FRCPC
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1B2
        • Recruiting
        • Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lihi Eder, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vincent Piguet, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jensen Yeung, MD
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joseph Merola, MD, MMSc
        • Contact:
          • Jeffrey Sparks, MD
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • NYU Langone Health
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrea Neimann, MD, MSCE
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jonathan Samuels, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rebecca Haberman, MD, MSCI
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael Toprover, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrea Troxel, ScD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jiyuan Hu, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jose Scher, MD
        • Contact:
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14623
        • Recruiting
        • University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC)
        • Contact:
          • Christopher Ritchlin, MD, MPH
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francisco Tausk, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ralf Thiele, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Ritchlin, MD, MPH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years old or older;
  2. Both male & female;
  3. Psoriasis diagnosis (per dermatologist) for at least 2 years (in at least 30% of participants);
  4. Willing and able to provide informed consent;
  5. Fulfillment of HR-PsO criteria (Psoriasis (PsO) patients will meet the definition of HR if they fulfill the following criteria: a) PsO duration >2 years and Psoriasis Body Surface Area (BSA) >3% and positive imaging findings in MSKPDUS defined as a RM-PsASon score of >3.36

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence of inflammatory joint pain, enthesitis and/or dactylitis on exam;
  2. Current systemic immunosuppressive medication use (i.e., methotrexate, apremilast) at the time of enrollment or biologic therapy (ever);
  3. RA seropositivity (mid-high RF/ACPA titers);
  4. Current active malignancy;
  5. History of symptomatic polyarticular OA or other joint conditions (such as RA, gout, etc) that may impair the ability to assess for PsA development
  6. Conditions where initiation of guselkumab is prohibited in the prescribing information, including clinically important active infection and untreated latent tuberculosis;
  7. Known hypersensitivity to the study agent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Guselkumab + Topicals (GUS)
Guselkumab 100 mg 1 mL liquid formulation in a single-dose pre-filled syringe administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter (month 0 to month 24 for arm 1; week 24 to month 24 for arm 2).
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Topicals (PBO)
Guselkumab 100 mg 1 mL liquid formulation in a single-dose pre-filled syringe administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter (month 0 to month 24 for arm 1; week 24 to month 24 for arm 2).
• Placebo to Guselkumab 1 mL liquid formulation in a single-dose pre-filled syringe administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter (Month 0 to Week 20 for Arm 2).
No Intervention: Standard-of-Care Therapy (SOC)
In this third, non-randomized arm, patients would continue treatment with topical therapy or UVB, as part of our ongoing natural history of disease registries. This arm will include participants fulfilling RM-PsASon criteria but also those that do not (to serve as "negative" controls).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Musculoskeletal, Power Doppler Ultrasound (MSK-PDUS) Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Score is defined by the ultrasound (General Electric Logiq E9 or E10) equipment, not calculated through a scale.
Baseline, Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Transitioning to Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) by Modified CASPAR Criteria at Year 2
Time Frame: Year 2

To meet CASPAR criteria for diagnosis of PsA, a participant must have inflammatory articular disease (joint, spine, entheseal or dactyitic) and at least 3 points from the following:

  1. Evidence of current psoriasis (2pts), personal history of psoriasis (2pts), family history (1pt)
  2. Typical psoriatic nail dystrophy including onycholysis, pitting, and hyperkeratosis observed on current physical examination (1pt)
  3. A negative test result for the presence of rheumatoid factor by any method except latex (1pt)
  4. Either current dactylitis, defined as swelling of an entire digit, or a history of dactylitis recorded by a rheumatologist (1pt)
  5. Radiographic evidence of juxta-articular new bone formation appearing as ill-defined ossification near joint margins (but excluding osteophyte formation) on plain radiographs of the hand or foot (1pt) The eCRF will autopopulate the total number of points. If the total score ≥ 3, the participant meets criteria for PsA diagnosis.
Year 2
Percentage of Patients Transitioning to Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) by Modified CASPAR Criteria at Year 1
Time Frame: Year 1

To meet CASPAR criteria for diagnosis of PsA, a participant must have inflammatory articular disease (joint, spine, entheseal or dactyitic) and at least 3 points from the following:

  1. Evidence of current psoriasis (2pts), personal history of psoriasis (2pts), family history (1pt)
  2. Typical psoriatic nail dystrophy including onycholysis, pitting, and hyperkeratosis observed on current physical examination (1pt)
  3. A negative test result for the presence of rheumatoid factor by any method except latex (1pt)
  4. Either current dactylitis, defined as swelling of an entire digit, or a history of dactylitis recorded by a rheumatologist (1pt)
  5. Radiographic evidence of juxta-articular new bone formation appearing as ill-defined ossification near joint margins (but excluding osteophyte formation) on plain radiographs of the hand or foot (1pt) The eCRF will autopopulate the total number of points. If the total score ≥ 3, the participant meets criteria for PsA diagnosis.
Year 1
Severity of PsA at the time of synovio-entheseal development
Time Frame: Year 2
Severity will be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe.
Year 2
Change in the ultrasound composite score of synovitis
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24
Graded from 0-3 as absent, mild, moderate or severe according to images of a reference atlas (Hammer HB 2011). PD signal: 0=no PD-signal, 1=up to three single or two confluent signals, 2=less than half of the visible intracapsular area and 3=half or more of the visible intracapsular area covered by PD-signals.
Baseline, week 24
Change in Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index (MASEI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 24
MASEI: Structure is considered pathological (score=1) if there is a loss of fibrillar pattern, hypoechoic aspect, or fusiform thickening of the entheses. Erosions are defined as a cortical breakage with a step-down contour defect at the attachment of entheses at bone and graded with 0=absent or 3=present. Fascia and tendon thickness are measured at the point of maximal thickness on the bony insertion and graded with 0=normal or 1=thickened according to the reference values of the MASEI index. Enthesophytes are defined as calcifications at the entheses insertions into bone and graded with 0=absent, 1=small calcification, 2=clear presence of enthesophyte/calcification, 3= large calcifications or ossifications. PD-signals within entheses are scored with 0=absent or 3=present. Bursitis is investigated at the level of distal patellar tendon (infrapatellar bursitis) and the level of Achilles tendon insertion (retrocalcaneal bursitis) and graded with 0=absent and 1=present.
Baseline, week 24
Psoriasis Body Surface Area (BSA)
Time Frame: Week 24
The total BSA affected by plaque-type psoriasis will be estimated from the percentages of areas affected, including head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. The following calculations will be done: each reported percentage will be multiplied by its respective body region corresponding factor (head = 0.1, trunk = 0.3, upper limbs = 0.2, lower limbs = 0.4). The resulting four percentages will be added up to estimate the total BSA affected by psoriasis.
Week 24
Achieved IGA mod 2011 Score
Time Frame: Week 24
Score 0 - Clear - No signs of psoriasis. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present Score 1 - Almost clear - Normal to pink coloration of lesions; no thickening; no to minimal focal scaling Score 2 - Mild disease - Pink to light red coloration; just detectable to mild thickening; predominantly fine scaling Score 3 - Moderate disease - Dull bright red, clearly distinguishable erythema; clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling Score 4 - Severe disease - Bright to deep dark red coloration; severe thickening with hard edges; severe / coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions
Week 24
Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Scale
Time Frame: Week 24
FACIT consists of 13 statements regarding fatigue (e.g., "I feel fatigued", "I feel weak all over", "I feel tired", etc.). Items are scored as follows: 4=not at all, 3=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 1=quite a bit; 0=very much, EXCEPT items #7 and 8 which are reversed scored. Total score range is 0-52. A score of less than 30 indicates severe fatigue. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Week 24
Change in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The scale measures how good or bad one's health is on the day of the questionnaire. Total score is 0-100; the higher the score, the better the health (0 = worst health one can imagine, 100 = best health one can imagine)
Baseline, Week 24
Change in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Year 2
The scale measures how good or bad one's health is on the day of the questionnaire. Total score is 0-100; the higher the score, the better the health (0 = worst health one can imagine, 100 = best health one can imagine)
Baseline, Year 2
Change in International Dermatology Outcome Measures - Musculoskeletal -8 (IDEOM-MSK-8) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
IDEOM-MSK-8 is a short questionnaire that allows people with MSK conditions to report their symptoms and quality of life in a standardized way. The total range of score is 0-56; the higher the score, the better the MSK health status. In order to calculate the total score, the numbers next to the boxes that the participant has ticked on the questionnaire form is added up.
Baseline, Week 24
Change in Ultrasound (US) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
Score is defined by the ultrasound (General Electric Logiq E9 or E10) equipment, not calculated through a scale.
Baseline, Week 24
Proportion of participants who achieved ≥ 50% improvement in US score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
Assessed using ultrasound results.
Up to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose Scher, MD, NYU Langone Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 2, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20-01158

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposed to use the data will have access to the data upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to jose.scher@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on Guselkumab

Subscribe