Effectiveness of Adding Hyaluronidase to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

October 19, 2021 updated by: Hitham Mohammed Aly Elsayed, Sohag University

Effectiveness of Hyaluronidase as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgery

Background Brachial plexus block is a good choice for surgeries of the upper limb because it provides good quality of anesthesia and analgesia especially in patients with multiple comorbidities and in ambulatory surgery. Hyalaluronidase is a local anesthetic adjuvant used for ophthalmologic surgery. We evaluated the effect of adding hyaluronidase to bupivacaine as regard the onset and duration of motor and sensory block in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Methodology prospective, randomized and double-blind study conducted at Sohag University Hospital. A total of 40 adults scheduled for upper limb surgery, ASA I or II were randomly assigned into two groups (n=20). Group I received bupivacaine 0.375 % 15 mL + normal saline 4ml +hyaluronidase 800 IUin 1 ml. Group II received bupivacaine 0.375% 15 mL + normal saline5 ml. Both groups will be compared for onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia and complications.

Results The onset of sensory and motor block was significantly faster in hyaluronidase group than control group. Significant difference could not be detected in either duration of the sensory or motor block between the two groups.

Conclusion The use of hyaluronidase as an additive to bupivacaine fastens the onset of sensory and motor block of the brachial plexus in supraclavicular approach without affecting the duration of the block.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This prospective, randomized, controlled and double-blind study was conducted at Sohag University Hospital after approval from institution review board and obtaining written informed consents from all participants. Forty participants, aged 18 to 60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II, scheduled for elective surgery of the upper extremities were included in this study. Participants who refuse or have allergy to local anesthetic or hyaluronidase or suffering from severe renal, hepatic, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, psychiatric or neuromuscular disease will be excluded from the study in addition to pregnant or lactating women, patients with morbid obesity, coagulation disorders as well.

Sealed envelopes technique was used to randomly assign patients to both study groups; Group I; received bupivacaine 0.375 % 15 mL + normal saline 4ml +hyaluronidase 800 IU in 1 ml.

Group II; received bupivacaine 0.375% 15 mL + normal saline5 ml. After arriving to the operative theater basic monitoring was applied and intravenous line was inserted. Midazolam 2mg and Fentanyl 50 mcg was administered intravenously to all participants 15 minutes before the procedure. Anesthesiologist who carried out the block and recorded the study measurements was blinded to the treatment groups.

The participants were in supine position with the head rotated to the opposite side and neck extended, 7 to 12 MHz linear ultrasound probe (SonoScape A5, SonoScape Co., Ltd., China) was placed above the clavicle to identify distal trunks or proximal divisions of the brachial plexus lateral and cephalad to the subclavian artery above the first rib. After ultrasound pre-scan and local infiltration with 3ml lidocaine 2%, 100 mm, 20 gauge nerve-stimulating needle (Locoplex®, VYGON, FRANCE) was inserted under real time ultrasound guided technique in line approach and advanced until reaching the brachial plexus sheath the needle was repositioned to allow local anesthetic spread around all trunks or divisions. Injection was stopped if an increased resistance to injection experienced or parathesia to avoid intra neural injection. All participants were transferred to post-anesthesia care unit postoperatively to be observed for the following measurements:

The primary measurement:

  1. Onset of complete sensory block (time from injection to complete sensory block to pin prick).
  2. Onset of complete motor block (time from injection to complete motor block).

Secondary measurements:

  1. Duration of analgesia defined as time from injection to first analgesia request.
  2. Duration of sensory block (time between injection and complete recovery of sensation)
  3. Duration of motor block (time between injection and complete recovery of motor power)
  4. Side effects and complications (hypotension, sedation, nausea vomiting, dry mouth, hematoma or pneumothorax, neuropathy) Participants were allowed to receive analgesia as ketorolac 30 mg intramuscularly as a rescue analgesia if VAS > 4.

Statistical analysis:

After performing the power analysis of the study , it is decided that each group should contain at least a minimum of 18 cases (90% power and 0.05%alpha error).Considering possible data loss due to technical reasons, each group was decided to be 20 patients.

Recorded data were subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis of demographic and hemodynamic data while unpaired t-test was applied for onset time and duration of sensory and motor blocks and was reconfirmed with the Wilcoxon W and Mann-Whitney U tests. Statistical significance was defined by P-value < 0.05. chi-square/Fischer's exact test was used for analysis of adverse effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Sohag, Egypt, 82516
        • Recruiting
        • Sohag University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18 to 60 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II
  • Scheduled for elective surgery of the upper extremities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to local anesthetic or hyaluronidase
  • Severe renal or hepatic disease
  • Pulmonary, cardiac disease
  • Neurologic, psychiatric disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Morbid obesity
  • Coagulation disorders as well

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I
received bupivacaine 0.375 % 15 mL + normal saline 4ml +hyaluronidase 800 IU in 1 ml.
using hyaluronidase as an additive to bupivacaine
No Intervention: Group II
received bupivacaine 0.375% 15 mL + normal saline5 ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset of complete sensory block
Time Frame: during the first 24 hours
time from injection to complete sensory block to pin prick
during the first 24 hours
Onset of complete motor block
Time Frame: during the first 24 hours
time from injection to complete motor block
during the first 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration of anlgesia
Time Frame: during the first 24 hours
time from injection to first analgesia request
during the first 24 hours
Duration of sensory block
Time Frame: during the first 24 hours
time between injection and complete recovery of sensation
during the first 24 hours
duration of motor block
Time Frame: during the first 24 hours
time between injection and complete recovery of motor power
during the first 24 hours
side effects
Time Frame: during the first 24 hours
hypotension, sedation, nausea vomiting, dry mouth, hematoma or pneumothorax, neuropathy
during the first 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Hyaluronidase

3
Subscribe