- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05135377
Canadian Anaphylaxis Network- Predicting Recurrence After Emergency Presentation for Allergic REaction (CAN-PREPARE)
BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of allergy that rapidly affects multiple body systems and can be deadly. The highest incidence of anaphylaxis is in children and adolescents. In Canada, approximately every 10 minutes there is an Emergency Department (ED) visit for food allergy, and up to 80% of anaphylactic reactions in children are triggered by food. The ambiguity in how physicians manage anaphylaxis adds a huge burden to health care and further contributes to ED crowding. Current Canadian and international treatment guidelines universally recommend that all patients present to the ED for a prolonged period (6-24 hours) of in-hospital monitoring after initial reactions have been treated, to increase detection of biphasic anaphylaxis (BA). BA is a second wave of symptoms after initial resolution. These guidelines are based on poor or little evidence and have unintended negative impacts on patient safety and quality of life. Furthermore, this 'one-size fits all' approach to care leads to wasteful resource utilization that provides low value care.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the study is to derive a clinical prediction rule that identifies children with anaphylaxis who are at risk of BA.
METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study will enroll 1682 patients from 7 pediatric EDs that are members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) network. We will enroll patients < 18 years of age presenting to the ED with an allergic reaction that matches the diagnostic criteria of anaphylaxis. Research assistants (RA) present in the ED will screen, obtain consent, and prospectively collect all study data. The Research Assistant or Research Nurse will follow patients during their ED visit and ascertain, in conjunction with the medical team, if the patient developed biphasic anaphylaxis in the ED. A standardized follow-up survey conducted within 2-5 days of ED or hospital discharge will determine if a biphasic reaction occurred following ED disposition. We established an advisory council comprised of end-users and community partners external to the project team to monitor project milestones.
STUDY TEAM: We have established an international multidisciplinary team of experts in pediatrics, emergency medicine, allergy/immunology, research methodology and statistics, and knowledge translation. Our team is supported by the PERC network.
EXPECTED OUTCOME: Providing the best evidence-based, value care at the lowest cost is a moral and ethical imperative. Therefore, in alignment with national and international research priorities, we propose to develop a robust prediction model for BA. This model will address a significant gap in current knowledge and practice, with anticipated benefit for patient care and health system efficiency worldwide. This trial will generate novel, clinically relevant data on optimal ED management of children with anaphylaxis that integrates best value care with patient safety.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T3B 6A8
- Alberta Children's Hospital
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2C8
- Stollery Children's Hospital
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4L8
- McMaster University
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W6
- Children's Hospital of Western Ontario
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L1
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
- The Hospital for Sick Children
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1C5
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients < 18 years of age presenting to the ED with an allergic reaction that matches diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis as defined by the World Allergy Organization (WAO) in 2019. The 2019 WAO anaphylaxis guidelines clarify the involvement of two organ systems to diagnose anaphylaxis, stating that "although the diagnosis of anaphylaxis usually depends on the involvement of multiple organ systems, anaphylaxis may present as an acute cardiac or respiratory event as the only manifestation of anaphylaxis." Thus, a patient with isolated hypotension, bronchospasm, or upper airway obstruction after exposure to a known or potential trigger will be deemed to have anaphylaxis, even if typical skin features are absent.
- Language proficiency in English or French
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anaphylactic reaction that occurred in the context of a suicidal attempt or intoxication
- Anaphylactic reaction that begins in hospital and managed outside ED (on an inpatient or outpatient unit)
- Patient who is unable to complete the follow-up survey post ED discharge.
- Previous enrollment in the CAN-PREPARE Study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Children with Anaphylaxis
Patients under 18 years of age presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with an allergic reaction that matches diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis.
|
Not applicable - observational study
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of biphasic anaphylaxis
Time Frame: Up to 5 days post enrollment
|
The primary outcome for this prospective cohort study of children who present to ED with anaphylaxis is the development of biphasic anaphylaxis (BA) in the ED or after hospital/ED discharge.
As per the published consensus definition in 2019, to be classified as BA, an anaphylactic reaction must meet 3 criteria: 1) initial anaphylactic reaction followed by resolution of all initial manifestations for ≥1 h, with no new symptoms or treatment administered in that time; 2) the second phase of new or recurrent symptoms or signs that meet the consensus definition of anaphylaxis, and 3) the new or recurrent symptoms or signs are not caused by antigen re-exposure.
This definition focuses on clinically important or major biphasic reactions.
Mild symptoms that involve only the skin (e.g.
urticarial rash) without any other systems involvement will be captured and classified as minor biphasic responses.
However, these minor responses do not meet our case definition for BA.
|
Up to 5 days post enrollment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy C Plint, MD, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
- Principal Investigator: Waleed Alqurashi, MD, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
- Principal Investigator: Marcus S Shaker, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CTO 3721
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anaphylaxis
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Active, not recruitingIdiopathic Anaphylaxis | Drug Anaphylaxis | Venom Anaphylaxis | Food AnaphylaxisUnited States
-
University of MichiganThe Gerber FoundationCompleted
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceSanofi; GlaxoSmithKline; Zambon SpA; Laboratoires URGO; Pierre Fabre Medicament; Bi... and other collaboratorsUnknownNeuromuscular Blocking Agents AnaphylaxisFrance
-
University of LeedsUnknownExercise AnaphylaxisUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, AngersCompletedAnaphylaxis Caused by Hymenoptera Venom (Disorder)France
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedWheat Allergy | Anaphylaxis Food | Anaphylaxis ExerciseThailand
-
Nasus PharmaEnrolling by invitation
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineCompleted
-
Aravax Pty LtdActive, not recruitingImmune System Diseases | Peanut Hypersensitivity | Peanut Allergy | Peanut-Induced AnaphylaxisUnited States, Australia
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedPerioperative/Postoperative Complications | Drug-Induced AnaphylaxisEgypt, United Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Observational
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruiting
-
Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.Withdrawn
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUniversiteit AntwerpenUnknownType 1 Diabetes | Diastolic Dysfunction | Coronary Artery CalcificationsBelgium
-
St. Louis UniversityRecruitingVertebral Artery StenosisUnited States
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompletedPostoperative Complications | Intraoperative Complications | Patient Safety | Risk ManagementNew Zealand, Switzerland, United States, Netherlands, Spain, Austria, Turkey, United Kingdom, Australia, Greece, Ireland, Italy
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaRecruitingKnee OsteoarthritisSpain
-
University of ManitobaCompletedObesity | Pregnancy | Cesarean SectionCanada
-
Drexel UniversityCompletedOsteoporosisUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Center for Advancing Translational...CompletedHead and Neck Cancer | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Lung CancerUnited States
-
Masonic Cancer Center, University of MinnesotaCompletedAcute Leukemia | Chemotherapy-Induced Gut Barrier DamageUnited States