Predicting Peanut Anaphylaxis and Reducing Epinephrine (PrePARE)

August 15, 2025 updated by: Charles (Chase) Schuler, University of Michigan

Transepidermal Water Loss as a Predictor for Severe Allergic Reactions in Oral Food Challenges

This research study is testing a new way to look for the early stages of anaphylaxis. Eligible participants will have a small monitor (transepidermal water loss) placed on the forearm during a food challenge (for peanut allergies). This monitor continuously records the amount of water lost through the skin.

In a previous study the team learned what values are associated with an anaphylactic reaction. These values are called "stopping rules." This study is looking at whether it can use these new stopping rules to end the oral food challenge before a person may show any symptoms.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a known history of food anaphylaxis to peanut confirmed by an allergist
  • Have had skin and blood food allergy testing to peanut within the past 12 months. Meet the 80% likelihood positive predictive value threshold for peanut allergy based on at least 1 of either the skin or blood immunoglobulin E (IgE) tests per current literature corrected for age.
  • Meet all clinical oral food challenge (OFC) requirements. This includes no asthma or atopic dermatitis exacerbations, no recent viral infections, no recent antibiotics, and no food allergy reactions in the past month.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any known cardiovascular disease, cancer, pulmonary disease except well-controlled asthma, or other condition that would preclude an OFC otherwise.
  • Any medication use that would interfere with an OFC result. Medications in this category include antihistamines (first or second generation) within 1 week, omalizumab within 3 months, and others listed in the protocol appendix.
  • Any skin condition aside from well-controlled eczema that might impact TEWL measurement, including such conditions as autoimmune skin conditions (such as psoriasis), congenital ichthyoses, hyper-IgE syndromes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Monitor (TEWL) and stopping rules
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test.
The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Active Comparator: Monitor (TWLG) without stopping rules
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures.
The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anaphylaxis Occurrence Rates in Each Group
Time Frame: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)
Any Brighton Level 1, 2, or 3 anaphylaxis. The Brighton Level is a system for classifying the severity and diagnostic certainty of anaphylaxis cases, particularly in the context of adverse events following immunization. Results reflect the number of participants who experienced any of the Brighton Level 1, 2, or 3 anaphylaxis events.
Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reaction Rates in Each Group
Time Frame: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)
Results reflect the number of participants who experienced any objective symptom of allergic reaction (e.g., hives, angioedema, vomiting, wheeze, etc) not rising to the definition of anaphylaxis.
Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)
Anaphylaxis Severity in Each Group
Time Frame: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)
Anaphylaxis severity was graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 = mild, 5 = death)) according to criteria set forth in the Consortium for Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale.
Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)
Anaphylaxis Likelihood in Each Group Based on the Brighton Score
Time Frame: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)
The Brighton score was a 1-3 score of anaphylaxis likelihood. Participants were categorized based on level of anaphylaxis likelihood: Not Applicable (no reaction), Brighton Level 1 (most likely), Brighton Level 2 (medium likelihood), Brighton Level 3 (least likely), Unclassified (reaction present, but with insufficient symptoms for participant's reaction to be classified)
Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chase Schuler, MD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anaphylaxis Food

Clinical Trials on Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules

Subscribe