Care Transition Intervention for Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer

September 29, 2025 updated by: Daniel E Lage, MD, MSc, Massachusetts General Hospital

Randomized Trial of a Care Transition Intervention for Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer

This study is examining whether a care transition intervention, CONTINUUM (CONTINUity of care Under Management by video visits), consisting of a supportive care-focused video visit with an oncology nurse practitioner (NP) within three business days of hospital discharge, may improve post-discharge transitions of care for recently hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To address the rising incidence and burden of hospital readmissions for patients with advanced cancer, the investigators developed a population-specific care transition intervention based upon the scholarly literature and our qualitative study. The intervention, CONTINUUM (CONTINUity of care Under Management by video visits), consists of a video visit conducted by an oncology NP within three business days of hospital discharge, to: (1) reconcile medications, (2) manage symptoms, (3) review the post-hospital care plan for hospitalization-specific issues, and (4) schedule follow-up with the outpatient oncology team.

From 01/07/21 to 05/28/21, the investigators conducted a pilot trial of CONTINUUM in 54 patients with advanced cancer recently discharged from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center (NCT04640714). The investigators found that the intervention was feasible and acceptable in our population.

The investigators are now conducting a randomized controlled trial of the CONTINUUM intervention versus standard of care, to study whether CONTINUUM improves patients' confidence in managing their health condition, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure-13. The investigators will also assess the efficacy of CONTINUUM for improving patient satisfaction with clinician communication, and physical and psychological symptom burden. Lastly, the investigators will explore the effect of the intervention on hospital readmissions within 30-days.

Study procedures include random assignment to either the CONTINUUM intervention or standard oncology care following hospital discharge, questionnaires and medical record data collection.

Participants are expected to be on the study for up to 40 days after hospital discharge.

It is anticipated that about 286 people will take part in this research study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

286

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 18 years
  • First unplanned admission since diagnosis of advanced cancer to to the oncology service at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) or the medicine service with oncology consultation
  • Known diagnosis of advanced breast, thoracic, genitourinary, gastrointestinal cancers, sarcoma, or melanoma
  • Receiving ongoing oncology care at MGH
  • Verbal fluency in English
  • Internet/wifi or telephone access
  • Residing in Massachusetts at the time of hospital discharge

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted electively
  • Discharged to a location other than home or expired during admission
  • Discharged with hospice services

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CONTINUUM Intervention Post-Hospital Discharge
Participants will receive CONTINUUM intervention visit with a nurse practitioner within three business days of hospital discharge and complete questionnaires about their cancer and care.
The intervention, CONTINUUM (CONTINUity of care Under Management by video visits), consists of a video visit conducted by an oncology nurse practitioner within three business days of hospital discharge, to: (1) reconcile medications, (2) manage symptoms, (3) review the post-hospital care plan for hospitalization-specific issues, and (4) schedule follow-up with the outpatient oncology team.
Active Comparator: Usual Care Post-Hospital Discharge
Participants will receive standard oncology care following hospital discharge with follow-up appointments scheduled per primary team and participant preferences. Participants will complete questionnaires about their cancer and care.
Patients assigned to the usual care group will have their post-discharge follow-up scheduled per hospital, outpatient oncology team, and patient preference.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' Confidence in Managing their Health Condition using the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13)
Time Frame: Baseline to 10-20 days after hospital discharge
Compare change in the PAM-13 from baseline to 10-20 days post-discharge between study groups. The PAM-13 is scored 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater confidence in managing one's health condition.
Baseline to 10-20 days after hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Communication using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Communication subscale
Time Frame: Up to 10-20 days after hospital discharge
Compare differences in CAHPS-Communication at up to 10-20 days post-discharge between study groups. CAHPS-Communication has a composite score (score range 0-20) with higher scores indicating better satisfaction. As recommended by CAHPS, we will also analyze specific differences in CAHPS-Communication individual items, which relate to patients' assessment of whether clinicians discussed 1) illness course expectations, 2) what is most important to the patient, and 3) how the treatment plan should match what is most important to the patient. These items are scored as "Yes" vs. "No" responses.
Up to 10-20 days after hospital discharge
Symptom Burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r)
Time Frame: Baseline to 10-20 days after hospital discharge
Compare change in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) total score and physical sub-scale between baseline and 10-20 days of discharge between study groups. Scores on the ESAS-r range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden. Scores on the ESAS-Physical sub-scale range from 0-70 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden.
Baseline to 10-20 days after hospital discharge
Psychological Symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4)
Time Frame: Baseline to 10-20 days after hospital discharge
Compare change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) between baseline and 10-20 days of discharge between study groups. The PHQ-4 is a 4-item tool that contains two 2-item subscales assessing depression and anxiety symptoms. Both subscales and the composite PHQ-4 score can also be evaluated continuously, with higher scores indicating worse psychological distress. Scores on each subscale range from 0 to 6.
Baseline to 10-20 days after hospital discharge

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-day Hospital Readmissions
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after discharge
Compare hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge between study groups.
Up to 30 days after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel E Lage, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the Partners Innovations team at http://www.partners.org/innovation

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on CONTINUUM Intervention

Subscribe