- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05167344
Evaluation of the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E) for Vulnerable Youth (HRP-E)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Background and Design:
Vulnerable youth disproportionately experience dating violence, trauma, abuse, and maltreatment. Vulnerable youth are defined as youth at risk of, or currently experiencing, harm or adversities due to social and environmental factors. Youth who have experienced violence, trauma, abuse, and maltreatment have a more difficult time developing healthy, stable relationships in adolescence and beyond. They also often become involved in community mental health care, welfare care, and the justice system. Vulnerable youth are in need of programming to provide education and skill-building in areas such as healthy relationships, mental health, and substance use. Many stakeholders, including university-based researchers and community partners, recommend integrating mental health interventions into settings where youths are already receiving essential services (e.g., schools, child welfare agencies).
The Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E) fills a gap in mental health promotion and healthy relationship programming. It is a trauma-informed, 16-session manualized program designed to be facilitated in small group settings by educators or community professionals. The program's core components derive from the evidence-based, Canadian Fourth R program, a classroom-based, universal healthy relationships promotion and dating violence prevention curriculum (Crooks et al., 2011, 2015; Wolfe et al., 2009, 2012). The HRP-Enhanced program has been successfully implemented in various settings (e.g., schools, youth corrections). However, the impact of the program on vulnerable youth has not been extensively studied and needs to be further examined to under the effectiveness of this program across diverse settings (e.g., community mental health services, child welfare services, juvenile justice).
Investigators will work with our community partners to undertake a mixed-methods evaluation, including repeated measures time-series survey and follow-up interviews, to examine the impacts of the HRP-Enhanced Program to build evidence on what type of programming works with diverse vulnerable youth populations. Program facilitators will track session activities and youth participation throughout the program, and participate in a post-program implementation. Specifically, investigators will be able to determine the extent to which the HRP-E promotes positive mental health and well-being among vulnerable youth and identify changes in social-emotional assets and resilience, youth well-being, mental health, dating violence and help-seeking.
Participants:
Youth participating in HRP-E and program facilitators are eligible to participate in this study. Investigators will work with each community partner to identify 2 to 4 HRP-E groups they are delivering to be invited to participate in this research study (a total of 20 groups). Approximately 100-150 youth are expected to participate in this study, and approximately 10 to 20 facilitators. The number of youth and facilitators will be dependent on the number of HRP-Enhanced groups delivered and the total number of youth participating in the program.
Procedures:
Youth will be invited to participate in three research activities: a survey at four time-points, individual interviews, and providing consent for the use of program session tracking information collected by facilitators on their participation in the program for research purposes. (note: the session tracking data are collected routinely by facilitators, so it is the use of those data that participants are consenting to, not the collection).
The survey is administered at four time-points: i) two weeks to one month before they start the program (baseline); ii) at the start of the program (pre-intervention); iii) at the end of the program (post-intervention), and; iv) one month after the end of the program (follow-up). The survey asks questions about youths' mental health and well-being, who they might seek support from, dating and dating violence, bullying, and questions about their identities. The interview will take place approximately 4 to 6 months after the youth completes the program. The semi-structured interview asks youth about their experiences participating in the program and any skills they have learned and used.
The session tracking data includes youths' attendance, perceived engagement (as rated by the facilitator), and any trauma-related behaviours shown in group (as rated by facilitator). If youth consent to the sharing of those data, they will be de-identified by facilitators and shared with a unique participant identifier (ID) to facilitate merging of data across sources.
Facilitators implementing the HRP-E program will be invited to share their quality improvement data from their session tracking sheets for research purposes. They are also invited to complete an online implementation survey at the end of the HRP-Enhanced group to understand their experiences implementing the program with the recent HRP group they facilitated. The survey includes questions regarding group and facilitator characteristics, group format and logistics, virtual considerations, modifications, and program impact.
Planned Analyses:
Investigators will explore the baseline and pre-intervention data through bivariate analyses to investigate significant differences in outcomes and regression to the mean. If no significant differences, a new time 1 variable will be calculated using the mean of time 1 and time 2. Bivariate comparisons will be completed between pre-intervention and post-intervention outcomes, as well as pre-intervention and follow-up outcomes. Effect sizes will be calculated using Cohen's d. Analyses will also include general linear model (GLM) repeated measures to examine potential gender effects and/or time-by-gender interactions related to post-intervention outcomes. Finally, chi-square analyses will be conducted to determine whether systematic attrition occurred.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Claire Crooks
- Phone Number: 89245 519-661-2111
- Email: ccrooks@uwo.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Meghan Fournie
- Phone Number: 84360 519-661-2111
- Email: mfourni8@uwo.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 1G7
- Recruiting
- Western University
-
Contact:
- Meghan Fournie, MHIS
- Phone Number: 84360 519-661-2111
- Email: mfourni8@uwo.ca
-
Contact:
- Claire Crooks, PhD
- Email: ccrooks@uwo.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Youth participating in the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced
- Facilitators delivering the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced
- A minimum of three youth participating as a group in the Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced
Exclusion Criteria:
- Youth with low literacy or cognitive functions who may not be able to complete the self-report measures
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E)
Youth participating in the HRP-E and facilitators delivering in the program
|
The Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced (HRP-E) is a small group mental health promotion and healthy relationship program designed for vulnerable, at-risk youth.
It is a trauma-informed, 16-session manualized program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Positive social-emotional functioning
Time Frame: Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Measured by the Social-Emotional Assets and Resiliency Scales-Adolescent (SEARS-A) that assesses social-emotional assets of responsibility, self-regulation, social competence, and empathy.
Participants respond to the 35 items on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, 3 = always).
The combined total score ranges from 0 to 105 with higher scores indicating greater social-emotional strengths.
|
Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Dating Violence
Time Frame: Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Dating violence perpetration as measured by the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (short form).
Participants respond to the 20 items on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = seldom, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often).
The sum of the perpetrator and victimization items are calculated (10 items each).
Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating a higher incidence of abusive behaviour (perpetrator items) or victim of abuse (victimization items).
|
Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Help-seeking intentions
Time Frame: Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Self-reported intentions to seek help as measured by General Help-seeking Questionnaire.
Participants indicate their likelihood to seek help for a personal or emotional problem from the people listed on a 4-point Likert scale (1= very unlikely, 2=unlikely, 3=likely, 4=very likely).
A mean score is calculated on the items with the higher score indicating a higher likelihood to seek help for a problem.
|
Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Actual help-seeking
Time Frame: Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Actual help-seeking over the past 2 weeks as measured by the Actual Help Seeking Questionnaire.
Participants check the people they have sought help from over a two-week period for a personal or emotional problem and then describe the type of problem.
A score for the total number of people they sought help from is calculated and open-ended descriptions are coded for type of problem (e.g., mental health, relationships, school, etc.).
|
Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Positive mental health
Time Frame: Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Emotional well-being and aspects of psychological and social functioning that occur within the past month as measured by the Adolescent Mental Health Continuum-Short Form.
Participants rate 14 items on a 6-point Likert scale from 0=Never to 5 = Every day.
Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating higher experience of positive mental health.
|
Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Emotional distress
Time Frame: Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Stress and depression items from modified Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21).
Participants rate the 14 stress and depression items on a 4-point Likert scale from 0=never to 3 = more than two times.
Total scores are calculated for the stress and depression subscales with a range of 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating higher stress or depression.
|
Change from baseline to one-month post program completion (up to 20 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dr. Claire Croooks, PhD, Western University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wolfe DA, Crooks CV, Chiodo D, Hughes R, Ellis W. Observations of adolescent peer resistance skills following a classroom-based healthy relationship program: a post-intervention comparison. Prev Sci. 2012 Apr;13(2):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0256-z.
- Crooks CV, Scott K, Ellis W, Wolfe DA. Impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on violent delinquency: distinctive benefits for youth with maltreatment histories. Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jun;35(6):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
- Wolfe DA, Crooks C, Jaffe P, Chiodo D, Hughes R, Ellis W, Stitt L, Donner A. A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Aug;163(8):692-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.69.
- Andrews, N., Pepler, D., Motz, M. (2019). Research and evaluation with community-based projects: Approaches, considerations, and strategies. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(4), 548-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019835821
- Antle, B. F., Sullivan, D. J., Dryden, A., Karam, E. A., & Barbee, A. P. (2011). Healthy relationship education for dating violence prevention among high-risk youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(1), 173-179. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.031
- Crooks CV, Scott KL, Broll R, Zwarych S, Hughes R, Wolfe DA. Does an evidence-based healthy relationships program for 9th graders show similar effects for 7th and 8th graders? Results from 57 schools randomized to intervention. Health Educ Res. 2015 Jun;30(3):513-9. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv014. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
- Smyth, P. (2017). Working with high-risk youth: A relationship-based practice framework. Routledge Academic. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315270043
- Wekerle C, Leung E, Wall AM, MacMillan H, Boyle M, Trocme N, Waechter R. The contribution of childhood emotional abuse to teen dating violence among child protective services-involved youth. Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan;33(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- WREM 120133
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Adolescent Behavior
-
World Health OrganizationLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; University of Ghana; Biomedical... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHealth-Related Behavior | Adolescent Behavior | Adolescent Development | Health Care Seeking BehaviorGhana, Tanzania, Zimbabwe
-
University of CoimbraRecruitingAdolescent Behavior | Adolescent - Emotional ProblemPortugal
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...UnknownAdolescent Behavior | Sex BehaviorUnited States
-
Karabuk UniversityCompleted
-
Cornell UniversityUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA)CompletedChild Behavior | Health Behavior | Adolescent BehaviorUnited States
-
Rhode Island HospitalCompletedSexual Behavior | Adolescent Behavior
-
Institute of Child HealthCompletedParents | Child Behavior | Adolescent BehaviorUnited Kingdom
-
Ginger YangUniversity of IowaRecruitingRisk Behavior | Adolescent Behavior | DriveUnited States
-
HopeLab FoundationWest Virginia UniversityCompletedHealth Behavior | Motivation | Adolescent BehaviorUnited States
-
The National Center on Addiction and Substance...National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedAdolescent BehaviorUnited States
Clinical Trials on Healthy Relationships Program-Enhanced
-
Montefiore Medical CenterChildren's Bureau - Administration for Children and FamiliesRecruitingParenting | Family Relations | Relationship, FamilyUnited States
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthCAMH FoundationCompleted
-
Western University, CanadaPublic Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)Completed
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedHIV Infections | Sexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited States
-
Pro-Change Behavior SystemsCompletedViolence | Bullying
-
Northeastern UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedDomestic Violence | Adolescent Behavior | Physical Violence | Interpersonal RelationshipsUnited States
-
Public Health Institute, CaliforniaAmerican Institutes for ResearchTerminatedSexually Transmitted Infections | Violence | Adolescent Relationship Abuse | Pregnancy (Unwanted) | Intentional InjuryUnited States
-
University of MinhoFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaRecruitingHealthy EatingPortugal
-
Human Development Research Foundation, PakistanColumbia University; Duke University; University of Liverpool; University of EssexCompleted