Influence of the Spatial Distribution of Hollow Screws on the Blood Supply and Prognosis of Femoral Neck Fractures

December 14, 2021 updated by: RenJi Hospital

Influence of Different Spatial Distribution of Hollow Screws on Blood Supply and Prognosis of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Femoral neck fracture is a common type of fracture in the elderly. For those without significant displacement (Garden I, II), more hip-preserving treatment strategies are adopted. The classic parallel hollow screw internal fixation for hip-preserving treatment is based on the sliding compression theory, and a clinical debate has gradually emerged, that is, the positive triangle And the two different spatial distribution methods of hollow nails and inverted triangle, which one is better. In addition, the distribution of hollow nails in actual operations is difficult to achieve a standard triangular distribution, and the damage to the epiphyseal vessels in the femoral head caused by repeated drilling of the guide needle cannot always be ignored. The relationship between the distribution and injury of blood vessels in the femoral head and the spatial distribution of hollow screws on the prognosis of head necrosis of non-displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly is worth studying. This topic is based on the three advantages of TianJi orthopedic robots used in the elderly femoral neck fracture hollow nail hip-saving surgery: 1.standardized triangular nail placement with strong repeatability; 2. precise nail placement to reduce the risk of screw penetration; 3. limited guide pins The number of drill holes is to rule out repeated drill holes that damage the blood vessels in the femoral head. The preoperative and postoperative vascular injury in the femoral head (enhanced MRI of the femoral head) was compared to assess the prognosis of patients, and to clarify the influence of the spatial distribution of hollow screws on the blood supply and prognosis of the femoral neck fracture in the elderly.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

the investigators choose 60-80-year-old Garden I or II patients with initial fractures. Hollow nails are the first choice for treatment of these patients. However, the spatial arrangement of hollow nails, local blood supply, and biomechanical properties have a greater impact on the prognosis of fractures. , There are still some controversies, which are also the current research hotspots. Our research conclusions may increase the success rate of hip preservation and will guide the treatment of these patients. This study is based on the precise placement of nails by the Dimensity orthopedic robot, and compares the vascular injury of the femoral head before and after the nail placement (femoral head enhanced MRI) to assess the prognosis of the patient. The influence of blood supply and prognosis of femoral neck fracture in the elderly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Ping Huang, Master
  • Phone Number: +86 13916121692
  • Email: 8813@renji.com

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200127
        • Recruiting
        • Renji hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A new initial intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck;
  • Garden classification I or II;
  • Accept closed reduction robot-assisted hollow nail surgery;
  • ASA score 1-2, can tolerate anesthesia;
  • Age 60-80 years old (inclusive);
  • Able to fully understand and voluntarily sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Old or pathological fractures;
  • Patients with acetabular fracture;
  • Those who have general conditions or accompanying diseases that make it difficult for people to tolerate surgery, such as: coagulation dysfunction, or heart, liver, and kidney dysfunction;
  • Severe infections systemically or locally;
  • Those who refuse to sign informed consent;
  • In any case, if the researcher believes that the patient is not suitable for this treatment or there are other factors that affect the efficacy of the observation of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hollow nails are arranged in a triangle
Triangular Nail Placement of Femoral Neck in arm A Femoral Neck Inverted Triangle Nail Surgery in arm B
Experimental: Hollow nail inverted triangle arrangement
Triangular Nail Placement of Femoral Neck in arm A Femoral Neck Inverted Triangle Nail Surgery in arm B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparison of hip joint function at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
Harris score
6 months after surgery
comparison of hip joint function at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
Harris score
12 months after surgery
Imaging evaluation of the vascular condition of the femoral head epiphysis before surgery
Time Frame: One day before surgery
Imaging evaluation of the vascular condition of the femoral head epiphysis
One day before surgery
Imaging evaluation of the vascular condition of the femoral head epiphysis after surgery
Time Frame: 2 months after surgery
Imaging evaluation of the vascular condition of the femoral head epiphysis
2 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative indicators-surgical blood loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative
surgical blood loss(ml)
Intraoperative
Intraoperative indicators-operation time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
operation time(minute)
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ping Huang, Master, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medical Renji Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe