Self-Evaluating Anesthesia Competency Among Nurse Anesthetists

January 4, 2022 updated by: Ngamjit Pattaravit, Prince of Songkla University

Self-Evaluating Anesthesia Competency Among Nurse Anesthetists: The Survey Study

Continuing Medical Education (CME) has been proved that not only improving healthcare provider performance but also improving the patient outcome.Previous studies results showed that long established and multiple CME sessions, various methods and interactive sessions help the learners to improve their competency. CME among the nurses seem to be more difficult than in the physicians. Regarding to work schedule, lack of support from institution especially funding. Outcome-based continuing professional development course that provide practical skills sessions and give a chance for learners to reflect themselves help the learner to determine the performance gap between the learner real life practice and the standard of care. So in term of professional development, the practitioner can improve their competency from clinical level to professional level and finally managerial level.

After graduation,There are just only few anesthesia education courses for nurse anesthetists in each year. These may be not enough in order to maintain either knowledge or essential skills needed in anesthesia real life practice. The primary objective of this is to determine that which kinds of knowledge and skills in anesthesia that the nurse anesthetists in our institution lack off.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After graduation, CME is one of the important step to improve both the graduate's competencies and the quality of healthcare services. Throughout the professional career paths, nurse anesthetists in different career stages have different level of competency and expectations. Retention of knowledge and skills are much different between the new graduate nurses and mid to late career nurse. Feasible training program by using interactive teaching methods can improve the learner's satisfaction. There are just only few anesthesia education courses for nurse anesthetists in each year. These may be not enough in order to maintain either knowledge or essential skills needed in anesthesia real life practice. The primary objective of this is to determine that which kinds of knowledge and skills in anesthesia that the nurse anesthetists in our institution lack off. The secondary objective is the correlation between anesthesia non-technical skills (ANTS) and years of experience among nurse anesthetists. The results of this study will be useful information for creating additional anesthesia training course for this graduate group. Furthermore, Improving the anesthesia standard of care in the near future.

In this study, the investigator team designs to use self-evaluating form as a tool for any competencies evaluation. The Numerical Rating Scale (range from 1-10, 1= least competency, 10 =highest competency) will be used. After ethical committee approval, the subject group will be invited by the investigator team by using participant information form. In case of the participants have willing to enroll in this study. The consent form must be signed and then the participant could download the self-evaluating form (google form, no personal identity record) via QR code. After data collection completion, the statistical analysis will be done by using R program. The statistically significance is set as p< 0.05.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Songkhla
      • Hat yai, Songkhla, Thailand, 90110
        • Prince of Songkla University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

-Nurse anesthetist at Prince of Songkla Hospital who is currently working in Anesthesia field

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nurse anesthetist at Prince of Songkla Hospital who is currently working in Anesthesia field

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Nurse anesthetist
In this study, the investigator team designs to use self-evaluating form as a tool for any competencies evaluation. The Numerical Rating Scale (range from 1-10, 1= least competency, 10 =highest competency) will be used for any anesthesia skills evaluation. The participant could download the self-evaluating form (google form, no personal identity record) via QR code.
The Numerical Rating Scale (range from 1-10, 1= least competency, 10 =highest competency) will be used for any anesthesia skills evaluation. (download the self-evaluating form via QR code)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
determine level of knowledge and skills in anesthesia among nurse anesthetists
Time Frame: from 0 to 35 years of experience in anesthesia
level of competency (1-10)
from 0 to 35 years of experience in anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between anesthesia non-technical skills (ANTS) and years of experience among nurse anesthetists.
Time Frame: from 0 to 35 years of experience in anesthesia
correlation between anesthesia non-technical skills (ANTS) and years of experience among nurse anesthetists.
from 0 to 35 years of experience in anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • competency self evaluation

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe