Healing of Rectal Anastomosis Sealed With a Concentrate Derived From the Patient's Blood, After Rectal Cancer Surgery (OBANORES)

March 26, 2024 updated by: University of Aarhus

Obsidian in Anastomotic Healing After Rectal Cancer Resection: A Prospective Clinical Feasibility Study

Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancer diseases, with more than 1500 new cases per year in Denmark. Fortunately, if the tumor is discovered early, surgeons can remove the part of the intestine that is afflicted, and they can often sew the intestine-ends back together, forming what is known as an anastomosis. However, in 10-15% of cases, this anastomosis doesn't heal completely, leading to anastomotic leakage. This is a serious complication, with detrimental effects for the individual patient. Previous measures to avoid this complication, have proven unsuccessful.

Obsidian is a mixture derived from the patients' own blood, that contains components of blood normally responsible for stopping bleeding and kickstarting the healing process. It is already used in other clinical settings and preliminary, yet unpublished, results from a pilot study have shown its promise in decreasing the risk of anastomotic leakage in rectal anastomosis. However, its use has not been examined when performing surgery for rectal cancer with minimally invasive technique, which is today's standard.

The main clinical hypothesis of this feasibility study is that it is possible for colorectal surgeons to apply Obsidian successfully on the anastomotic area with minimal invasive technique, as a supplement during rectal cancer resection with anastomosis.

This study will be conducted at the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital. 50 patients will be included, who will undergo minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery with an anastomosis. Right after the onset of anaesthesia, 120 ml of blood will be collected from the patient and will be processed, making a 5-6 ml Obsidian concentrate. When the tumor-bearing part of the rectum has been removed, Obsidian will be applied, according to a pre-specified protocol.

If the application is deemed successful (based on predefined assessment criteria) in at least 90% of our included patients, then this study will serve as a stepping stone for a bigger study, the aim of which will be to assess if this method can indeed bring down the rate of anastomotic leakage in such patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Central Denmark Region
      • Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, 8200
        • Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with biopsy proven rectal cancer subjected to minimally invasive rectal resection with anastomosis (TME or PME).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary rectal cancer (adenocarcinoma) with the lower boarder within 15 cm from the anal verge assessed by rigid proctoscopy
  • Clinical UICC stage I-III at time of rectal cancer diagnosis
  • Deemed suitable for intended curative rectal cancer resection at MDT either by total mesorectal excision (TME) or partial mesorectal excision (PME)
  • Scheduled for elective, minimal invasive surgery
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Age at least 18 years
  • Written and orally informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Distant metastatic disease
  • Locally advanced rectal cancer requiring extended resection
  • Open surgery
  • Benign lesions of the rectum
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Another malignant disease within previous 2 years
  • Inability and unwillingness to give informed consent
  • Pregnant (positive pregnancy test) or breast feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of successful use and application of Obsidian as a supplemental procedure in the creation of rectal anastomosis with minimal invasive technique
Time Frame: This outcome is measured during the intervention.

Defined as the surgeon being able re-inforce the anastomosis with Obsidian as described in our protocol. Assessment of the Obsidian application must be graded using the following rating assessment scale:

'Complete'

'Almost complete'

'Incomplete'

Each of these are detailed in the study protocol.

To be able to view the use of Obsidian application as a successful method, then the application should be rated as 'Complete' or 'Almost complete' in at least 45 out of 50 (90%) patients.

This outcome is measured during the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time spent for creating a rectal anastomosis with application of Obsidian
Time Frame: This outcome is measured during the intervention.
Time spent for creating the anastomosis with application of Obsidian is defined as: Time spent from inserting the circular stapler device in the rectal stump (Shortly before the start of Step 1 in Intervention Details), until the application around the circular anastomosis has been completed (End of Step 3 in Intervention Details).
This outcome is measured during the intervention.
The surgeon's self-assessment of the user-friendliness of using Obsidian
Time Frame: This outcome is measured immediately after the intervention.
Surgeon's self-assessment of the user-friendliness of using Obsidian is graded in three grades: 1. Easy, 2. Difficult, but can be performed, 3. Very difficult
This outcome is measured immediately after the intervention.
Anastomotic leak rate
Time Frame: Measured within 30 days after surgery
Anastomotic leak is defined according to the definition as described by Rahbari NN.
Measured within 30 days after surgery
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: From, and including, day of surgery to, and including, day of discharge, or up to 90 days after surgery.
Calculated as number of days
From, and including, day of surgery to, and including, day of discharge, or up to 90 days after surgery.
Re-hospitalization within 30 days after surgery
Time Frame: Measured within 30 days after surgery
All re-hospitalizations at departments of any kind at hospitals in Central Denmark Region after surgery will be recorded, including reason for re-hospitalization.
Measured within 30 days after surgery
Morbidity within 30 days after surgery graded ≥3 severity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Time Frame: Measured within 30 days after surgery

Morbidity within 30 days after surgery include surgical and medical complications graded ≥2 severity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, will be recorded.

Surgical complications include bleeding, fascia dehiscence, ileus, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal abscess, and anastomotic leakage. Medical complications include cerebral complications (transitory ischemic attack, stroke), pulmonary complications (pneumonia, atelectasis, pleural effusion), cardiac complications (atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure), gastrointestinal complications (high stoma output, paralysis >4 days), urogenital complications (urinary tract infections, urinary retention, acute kidney insufficiency), thromboembolic complications (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism).

Measured within 30 days after surgery
2-year mortality
Time Frame: Within 2 years after surgery
For safety reasons, mortality within 2 years after surgery will be recorded.
Within 2 years after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lene H Iversen, DMSc, PhD, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Application of autologous fibrin matrix (Obsidian)

Subscribe