Stereotactic Liver Ablation Assisted With Intra-Arterial CT Hepatic Arteriography and Ablation Confirmation Software Assessment (STEREOLAB)

April 14, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
To achieve adequate tumor treatment coverage with sufficient minimal ablation margins, several steps are required: firstly, it is critical to define tumor boundaries and extent on intra-procedural CT image; secondly, accurate planning, targeting, and confirmation of ablation probe placement within the tumor; thirdly, the use of an intra-procedural imaging assessment method to evaluate minimal ablation margins is required to define whether sufficient minimal ablation margins was obtained or if additional ablation is needed. Taking all together, those factors points to the need of having a high-precision ablation methodology for intra-procedural planning, monitoring, and ablation margin assessment. Currently, such methods are only utilized in isolation and the benefit of a combined and standardized procedure workflow is unknown. Therefore, our primary goal of this single-arm clinical trial is to investigate the technical efficacy of a high-precision liver ablation technique comprised by stereotactic-guidance, CT during hepatic arteriography-based imaging analysis, and computer-based software assessment of ablation margins for the treatment of patients referred to ablation for the treatment of primary and secondary liver cancers.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the technical efficacy and Local Tumor Progression-free survival [LTPFS] of a high-precision liver ablation technique comprised by stereotactic-guidance, CT during hepatic arteriography-based imaging analysis, and computer-based software assessment of ablation margins, for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastasis referred to percutaneous liver ablation.

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate the impact of this high-precision liver ablation technique on:

  1. Impact of minimally ablated margins on LTPFS
  2. 3D Minimal ablation margins;
  3. Adverse events;
  4. Liver function;
  5. Tissue properties from US elastography;
  6. Contrast-media utilization and radiation exposure;
  7. Overall oncological outcomes (disease-free and overall survival, and ability to provide salvage local therapy at the time of recurrence).
  8. Anesthesia/procedural time
  9. Response and Duration of response
  10. Assessing whether ringenhancing hypervascular liver micronodules represent metastasis

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bruno Odisio, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients presenting with up to 5 colorectal liver metastasis measuring up to 5 cm who are referred to percutaneous ablation;
  2. Ability to completely cover the target tumor with at least a 5 mm ablation margin as determined per pre-procedure cross-sectional imaging;
  3. Distance to central bile ducts > 1 cm;
  4. Adequate glomerular filtration rate (GFR > 40) and no severe allergies to iodine contrast-media;
  5. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign written informed consent;
  6. Age > 18 years-old;
  7. Performance status 0-2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Classification [ECOG]);
  8. Expected survival > 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of other prior or concomitant local therapy at the target tumor(s).
  2. Active bacterial infection or fungal infection on the day of the ablation.
  3. Platelet < 50,000/mm3.
  4. INR > 1.5
  5. Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  6. Currently breastfeeding or pregnant (latter confirmed by serum pregnancy test).
  7. Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation.
  8. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of ≥ 4.
  9. Any other loco-regional therapies at the target lesion(s).
  10. Anatomical variations in the arterial-hepatic blood supply of the liver that preclude the use of CTHA imaging.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Liver ablation
The ablation procedure will be performed in 1 day
Ablation needle placement An image-guidance device be used for planning of the procedure and for placement of the ablation needle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The scale is numbered from 0-100 (100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine)
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruno Odisio, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-0221
  • NCI-2022-03903 (Other Identifier: NCI-CTRP-Clinical Trial Reporting Registry)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe