Effects of Dry Needling on Autonomic Nervous System and Nociceptive Pain Processing in Neck Pain

June 21, 2022 updated by: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Effects of Dry Needling on Autonomic Nervous System and Nociceptive Pain Processing in Neck Pain. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Pain in the neck is a musculoskeletal disorder that affects many individuals. Dry needling has shown an effective technique for the treatment of shoulder and neck disorders. The mechanisms of action of the dry needling are not well-known. This study aims to evaluate the effects of dry needling in the upper trapezius on the autonomic nervous system and nociceptive pain processing in patients with non-specific neck pain.

Hypothesis: Dry needling applied in the upper trapezius in patients with non-specific neck pain produced greater activation of the autonomic nervous system and nociceptive pain processing than sham dry needling.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, using Dry Needling (DN). DN is a technique to treat musculoskeletal pain and physical impairment that consists of introducing needling filaments in the muscle trigger points.

Study Aims:

Aim #1: The primary aim of the study is to compare the effect (during the technique and five minutes after intervention) of a single session of DN on autonomic nervous system as measured by skin conductance in patients with non-specific neck pain with random assignment to two treatments: DN or Sham DN

Aim #2: The secondary aim of the study is to compare the immediate effect on pain sensitivity as measured by pressure pain threshold, activation of descending inhibition pain pathways as measured by temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation in patients with non-specific neck pain with random assignment to two treatments: DN and Sham DN.

Aim #3: The secondary aim of the study is to compare the immediate effect on intensity of pain as numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), relating pain disability (Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire), fear-avoidance of movement (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) and Catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale)

Aim #4: The secondary aim of the study is to correlate effects between clinical and other variables.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pain in the neck area, including the upper trapezius muscle;
  2. At least one active TrP (i.e., TrP which referred pain is able to reproduce the patient symptoms in the upper trapezius)
  3. Ability to read and understand Spanish
  4. Self-reported Intensity of pain rating on the 0-10 NPRS for the neck-shoulder region is 3 or greater
  5. Ability to understand, write, and speak Spanish fluently

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neurological symptoms or signs compatible with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
  2. Cervical trauma
  3. Systemic diseases
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Psychiatric problems
  6. Fear of needles.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dry Needling
One single session of DN
Needle will be placed at trapezius muscle. "Fast-in, Fast-out" technique will be used at the active trigger point of upper trapezius muscle.
Sham Comparator: Sham Dry Needling
One single session of Sham DN
Sham needle will be placed at trapezius muscle. Simulated "Fast-in, Fast-out" technique will be used at the active trigger point of upper trapezius muscle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin Conductance
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 minutes
Measured in the hand of the needled upper trapezius. Measured in microsiemens.
Through study completion, an average of 20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure Pain Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Measurement of pressure pain threshold in C5-C6 zygapophyseal joints, dorsal aspect of the midpoint between the base of the nail and the interphalangeal joint of index finger and and the tibialis anterior muscle.
Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Pressure Pain Stimuli for Temporal Summation
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Measurement of pressure pain stimuli until reach a 6 points in the numeric pain rating scale in the interphalangeal joint of index finger.
Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Temporal Summation
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Pain response using a numeric pain rating scale will be assessed to pressure stimuli. Series of brief contacts (10 stimuli) of pressure pain threshold will be applied dorsal aspect of the midpoint between the base of the nail and the interphalangeal joint of the index finger.
Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
CPM will be tested using the lower extremity submaximal effort tourniquet test. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was assessed using algometry at the dorsal aspect of the midpoint between the base of the nail and the interphalangeal joint at the index finger. After determining the pressure pain threshold (PPT) baseline, the conditioning stimulus was induced using a modified submaximal effort tourniquet procedure.Subjects verbally rated their leg pain until 6 was reached. Although the tourniquet remained inflated, PPT algometry assessment was performed in the same location as previously described (kg/cm2)
Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Temporal Summation during conditioned stimuli.
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Pain response using a numeric pain rating scale with a 10 scores (0-No pain - 10 The worst pain) will be assessed to pressure stimuli. Series of brief contacts (10 stimuli) of pressure pain threshold will be applied dorsal aspect of the midpoint between the base of the nail and the interphalangeal joint of the index finger using a lower extremity submaximal effort tourniquet test
Baseline; Immediate (10 minutes after intervention)
Pain Intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline; one week after intervention
Pain intensity measured with a 10 scores (0 - No pain - 10 The worst pain) numeric scale
Baseline; one week after intervention
Neck Pain-related Disability
Time Frame: Baseline; one week after intervention
The Northwick Park Neck Pain (NPQ) assess pain related disability by measuring pain and limitations in the daily activities
Baseline; one week after intervention
Global Rating of Change Scale (GRoC)
Time Frame: One week after intervention
The patients answered about their perception of improvement during the treatment period on a scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to zero (about the same) to 7 (a very great deal better).
One week after intervention
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Baseline; one week after intervention
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) was used to evaluate fear of movement and avoidance. Range from 11 to 44 points.
Baseline; one week after intervention
Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Baseline; one week after intervention
Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is a 12-item questionnaire with three components of catastrophizing: magnification, rumination, and helplessness (ranging from 0-52)
Baseline; one week after intervention
Pain Intensity during Intervention (Numeric Pain Rating Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline; immediate (ten minutes after intervention)
Pain intensity of the intervention was measured on a 10 points numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain),
Baseline; immediate (ten minutes after intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015/18

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Real Dry Needling

Subscribe