Effectiveness of Group and Individual Training in EFT for Patients in Remission From Melanoma

April 22, 2026 updated by: Soul Medicine Institute

Effectiveness of Group and Individual Training in Emotional Freedom Techniques for Patients in Remission From Melanoma

Serious medical diagnosis frequently induce fear focused on specific anticipations or generalized anxiety, along with uncertainty, insecurity, and disorientation. Other emotions such as anger, depression, hopelessness, shame, or grief may also become involved following a serious diagnosis. The adverse impact of stress on health and immune function is well-established, as well as its link to depression and anxiety. Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) has demonstrated efficacy in treating anxiety, depression, and PTSD. This study tests its effectiveness in reducing negative emotional symptoms in general, and fear of recurrence in particular, among individuals previously diagnosed with melanoma and currently in remission.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Serious medical diagnosis frequently induce fear focused on specific anticipations or generalized anxiety, along with uncertainty, insecurity, and disorientation. Other emotions such as anger, depression, hopelessness, shame, or grief may also become involved following a serious diagnosis. The adverse impact of stress on health and immune function is well-established, as well as its link to depression and anxiety. Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) has demonstrated efficacy in treating anxiety, depression, and PTSD. This study tests its effectiveness in reducing negative emotional symptoms in general, and fear of recurrence in particular, among individuals previously diagnosed with melanoma and currently in remission.

Specifically, the study aims:

  1. To assess the effect of instruction and practice of EFT on illness perception, fear of cancer recurrence, and wellbeing.
  2. To assess whether the social support provided by EFT instruction in a group setting makes this efficient mode of implementation non-inferior or even beneficial in comparison to personal instruction.
  3. To describe the emotions related to life events reported by patients in connection with the appearance and location of melanoma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978
        • The School Of Social Work Tel Aviv University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Melanoma diagnosis over six months prior to the study; confirmed by clinical, dermoscopic examination and pathology results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In active treatment for melanoma
  • schizophrenia
  • epilepsy
  • other malignant disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Individual EFT Therapy
Personal EFT instruction and practice group
EFT is an efficacious method demonstrated in over 100 clinical trials. It combines cognitive and exposure techniques with acupressure, in the form of fingertip percussion on acupuncture meridian points.
Experimental: Group EFT Therapy
Group EFT instruction and practice group
EFT is an efficacious method demonstrated in over 100 clinical trials. It combines cognitive and exposure techniques with acupressure, in the form of fingertip percussion on acupuncture meridian points.
No Intervention: Wait List
Wait list control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Illness perception
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Change in score on Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)
Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Perception of recurrence
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Change of perceived recurrence risk on a Likert scale
Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other physical symptoms
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Change in patient's self-report of somatization, pain, and other symptoms on a Likert scale
Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Depression
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Change in depressive symptoms on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Anxiety
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Change in anxiety symptoms on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Patient's self-report of quality of life
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Change in quality of life scores on the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)
Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Wellbeing
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up
Change in score on The Well-being Numerical Rating Scales (WB-NRSs).
Pre intervention, post 4 week intervention, and 3 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yael Benyamini, PhD, Tel Aviv University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

An anonymized data file will be made available to any other qualified investigator who requests it.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available upon publication and for 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Email request from qualified investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe