Outcomes of Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer

April 15, 2026 updated by: Daniel Segal, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Prospective Single Institutional Study Evaluating the Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Ablative Therapies in the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Primary and Salvage Setting

This study will be designed to define the efficacy and safety of ablative therapies in the management of localized prostate cancer and comprehensively evaluate quality of life outcomes and oncologic control following treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will be designed to define the efficacy and safety of ablative therapies in the management of localized prostate cancer and comprehensively evaluate quality of life outcomes and oncologic control following treatment.

There are several commercially available standard of care treatments available for local therapy of the prostate. Ablative therapies may be delivered via a whole gland or focal approach by systems including cryoablation (CA), brachytherapy, irreversible electroporation (IRE), high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) procedure or future novel prostate ablation systems.

These are single, outpatient treatments lasting between 2-4 hours and include treatment planning and energy delivery under guidance and are either administered via transperineally approach (cryoablation, IRE, brachytherapy) or via the urethral (TULSA-Pro) or rectum (HIFU).

This study protocol will not include experimental therapy and the enrolled subjects will undergo the ablative therapy as part of their standard of care treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

225

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • Recruiting
        • UTSW
        • Contact:
          • Sonobia Garrett

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with prostate cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed on prostate biopsy
  • Men with histologically confirmed local recurrence of prostate cancer diagnosed on prostate biopsy and standard of care imaging excluding locoregional or metastatic disease
  • Age 18-90 years.
  • Life expectancy > 1 year
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anatomic abnormalities that do not allow for focal ablation
  • Evidence of non-organ confined disease that is not feasible for ablation
  • Has active urinary traction infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Ablative Therapy Group
Enrolled subjects will undergo the ablative therapy as part of their standard of care treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oncologic outcomes as assessed by the rate of negative in-field biopsy at 12 months (primary setting)
Time Frame: 12 months post treatment
Oncologic outcomes will be assessed by the rate of negative in-field biopsy at 12 months which is defined by the Delphi consensus criterion of absence of clinically significant disease (≤ 3 mm of Gleason ≤ 6 disease in any biopsy core is insignificant)
12 months post treatment
Oncologic outcomes as assessed by the rate of advancement to systemic therapy or radical salvage therapies (primary setting)
Time Frame: 3 years post treatment
Oncologic outcomes will be assessed by the rate of advancement to systemic therapy or radical salvage therapies which is defined by prostatectomy, radiation or hormone therapy.
3 years post treatment
Oncologic outcomes as assessed by the rate of negative in-field biopsy at 12 months (salvage setting)
Time Frame: 12 months post treatment
Oncologic outcomes will be assessed by the rate of negative in-field biopsy at 12 months which is defined by the Delphi consensus criterion of absence of clinically significant disease (≤ 3 mm of Gleason ≤ 6 disease in any biopsy core is insignificant)
12 months post treatment
Oncologic outcomes as assessed by the rate of progression to systemic therapy or radical salvage therapies (salvage setting)
Time Frame: 3 years post treatment
Oncologic outcomes will be assessed by the rate of progression to systemic therapy or radical salvage therapies which is defined by prostatectomy, radiation or hormone therapy.
3 years post treatment
Change in urinary function as measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire (primary setting)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Change in urinary function is measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire which measures urinary symptoms and continence and the scores range from 0 to 35. A change > 3 points between baseline and follow-up assessments is defined as meaningful for the IPSS. Therefore, increases in IPSS scores larger than 3 points will be categorized as reduced urinary function (worse outcome).
Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Change in urinary function as measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire (salvage setting)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Change in urinary function is measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire which measures urinary symptoms and continence and the scores range from 0 to 35. A change > 3 points between baseline and follow-up assessments is defined as meaningful for the IPSS. Therefore, increases in IPSS scores larger than 3 points will be categorized as reduced urinary function (worse outcome).
Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Change in erectile function as measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score questionnaire (primary setting)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Change in erectile function is measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score questionnaire which classifies patients into five severity levels ranging from none (22-25 points) to severe (5-7 points). Patients whose IIEF-5 levels worsen from baseline to follow-up will be categorized as having reduced erectile function.
Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Change in erectile function as measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score questionnaire (salvage setting)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Change in erectile function is measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score questionnaire which classifies patients into five severity levels ranging from none (22-25 points) to severe (5-7 points). Patients whose IIEF-5 levels worsen from baseline to follow-up will be categorized as having reduced erectile function.
Baseline and 12 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with adverse events or short-term complications (primary setting)
Time Frame: 30 days post treatment
Adverse events (AE)s will be monitored and evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 for 30 days post-treatment
30 days post treatment
Number of participants with adverse events or short-term complications (salvage setting)
Time Frame: 30 days post treatment
Adverse events (AE)s will be monitored and evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 for 30 days post-treatment
30 days post treatment
Number of participants with adverse events or long-term complications (primary setting)
Time Frame: 3 years post-treatment
An adverse event (AE) will be monitored and evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 for up to 3 years post-treatment
3 years post-treatment
Number of participants with adverse events or long-term complications (salvage setting)
Time Frame: 3 years post-treatment
An adverse event (AE) will be monitored and evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 for up to 3 years post-treatment
3 years post-treatment
Number of participants undergoing combined treatment of the transitional zone (TZ ) due to bladder outlet obstruction caused by Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post treatment
Number of participants undergoing combined treatment of the transitional zone (TZ ) due to bladder outlet obstruction caused by BPH will be evaluated to determine efficacy of treatment of the transitional zone in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH via International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire
Baseline and 12 months post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Segal, M.D., University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will plan on sharing patient demographics, treatment modality, treatment oncologic outcomes, post-treatment questionnaire data and adverse events. Specific patient identifiers will be removed.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Subscribe