- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05554900
The Efficacy of Preventive Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface(RPNI) Reconstruction in Amputees
The Efficacy, Safety and Prognosis of Preventive Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface(RPNI) Reconstruction in Amputees: Study Protocol for a Cohort Study
The trial will be carried out in Peking University People's Hospital. The whole trial will last 3 years. Amputees from orthopedics and vascular surgery will be distributed into two groups randomly and receive different treatments including traditional resection and regenerative peripheral nerve interface(RPNI) surgery.The pain outcome,the impact of post-amputation pain on life and the utilization rate of prostheses will be collected to study the efficacy, safety and prognosis of preventive regenerative peripheral nerve interface reconstruction in amputees.
Investigators believe that RPNI can effectively reduce the incidence of post-amputation pain, reduce the degree of pain, improve the wearing rate of prostheses, and help patients return to normal life.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Guangxue Li
- Phone Number: 13581763702
- Email: luckylgx1012@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Recruiting
- Peking University People's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Guangxue Li
- Phone Number: 13581763702
- Email: luckylgx1012@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Perform traditional amputation and nerve disconnection or RPNIs in Peking University People's Hospital
- Age≥6 years
- Follow-up time≥12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Follow-up time<12 weeks
- Age<6 years
- Preoperative complications included cervical spondylosis, lumbar spinal stenosis, piriformis syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome and other peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: The control group
The control group received traditional amputation.The proximal nerve is blocked with lidocaine and cut off.
The end of the nerve retracted as far as possible and the bleeding point is ligated if necessary.
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: The experimental group(RPNIs group)
The experimental group received regenerative peripheral nerve interface(RPNI) surgery.
|
Each RPNI unit consists of nerve stump and free autologous muscle graft that is cut off from healthy muscle of the amputated limb.
The muscle graft is approximately 30×15×5 mm.The ends of the transected nerve are placed within the muscle belly of the free muscle grafts in an orientation that is parallel to the muscle fibers.
Next, the nerve is secured distally with 6-0 non-absorbable monofilament sutures in an epimysial-to-epineurial fashion.
The nerve is then wrapped around completely via muscle graft and epimysial securing sutures.
All RPNI units are placed in areas remote from the surgical incision and from the weight-bearing surface of the limb.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
postamputation pain
Time Frame: 12 weeks at least after surgery
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (NRS, PROMIS) were used to assess postamputation pain.The intensity of pain is described by 11 points from 0 (painless) to 10 (the most severe pain).
|
12 weeks at least after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Prosthesis wearing
Time Frame: 12 weeks at least after surgery
|
Whether the subject wears a prosthetic limb, and if so, what kind of prosthetic limb is worn.
|
12 weeks at least after surgery
|
|
Tumor recurrence and metastasis
Time Frame: 12 weeks at least after surgery
|
Whether there is tumor recurrence or metastasis.
|
12 weeks at least after surgery
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 weeks at least after surgery
|
The medical outcomes study-short from(MOS-SF 36) is used to evaluate the difference between the RPNIs group and the control group in the quality of life after amputation.The SF-36 scale consists of 36 questions with eight dimensions:physiological function, role-physiological, physical pain, general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health.
The scoring method was used for each dimension, ranging from 0 to 100 points.
The higher the score, the better the health status.
|
12 weeks at least after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Watson J, Gonzalez M, Romero A, Kerns J. Neuromas of the hand and upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Mar;35(3):499-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.019.
- Zimmermann M. Pathobiology of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001 Oct 19;429(1-3):23-37. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01303-6.
- Bowsher D. Human "autotomy". Pain. 2002 Jan;95(1-2):187-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00389-x.
- Niederberger E, Kuhlein H, Geisslinger G. Update on the pathobiology of neuropathic pain. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2008 Dec;5(6):799-818. doi: 10.1586/14789450.5.6.799.
- McFarland LV, Hubbard Winkler SL, Heinemann AW, Jones M, Esquenazi A. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):299-316. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0027.
- Davis RW. Phantom sensation, phantom pain, and stump pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jan;74(1):79-91.
- Vlot MA, Wilkens SC, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Symptomatic Neuroma Following Initial Amputation for Traumatic Digital Amputation. J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Jan;43(1):86.e1-86.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
- Ives GC, Kung TA, Nghiem BT, Ursu DC, Brown DL, Cederna PS, Kemp SWP. Current State of the Surgical Treatment of Terminal Neuromas. Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):354-364. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx500.
- Poppler LH, Parikh RP, Bichanich MJ, Rebehn K, Bettlach CR, Mackinnon SE, Moore AM. Surgical interventions for the treatment of painful neuroma: a comparative meta-analysis. Pain. 2018 Feb;159(2):214-223. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001101.
- Barbour JR, Yee A, Moore AM, Trulock EP, Buchowski JM, Mackinnon SE. Cadaveric nerve allotransplantation in the treatment of persistent thoracic neuralgia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1414-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.092.
- Elliot D. Surgical management of painful peripheral nerves. Clin Plast Surg. 2014 Jul;41(3):589-613. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2014.03.004.
- Lipinski LJ, Spinner RJ. Neurolysis, neurectomy, and nerve repair/reconstruction for chronic pain. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Oct;25(4):777-87. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
- Kuiken TA, Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Lock BA, Stubblefield K, Marasco PD, Zhou P, Dumanian GA. Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study. Lancet. 2007 Feb 3;369(9559):371-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60193-7.
- Peters BR, Russo SA, West JM, Moore AM, Schulz SA. Targeted muscle reinnervation for the management of pain in the setting of major limb amputation. SAGE Open Med. 2020 Sep 15;8:2050312120959180. doi: 10.1177/2050312120959180. eCollection 2020.
- Santosa KB, Oliver JD, Cederna PS, Kung TA. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for Prevention and Management of Neuromas. Clin Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;47(2):311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
- Kubiak CA, Kemp SWP, Cederna PS, Kung TA. Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces to Prevent Postamputation Pain. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):421e-430e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005922.
- Woo SL, Urbanchek MG, Cederna PS, Langhals NB. Revisiting nonvascularized partial muscle grafts: a novel use for prosthetic control. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):344e-346e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000317. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- lgx2022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.