Balloon + Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol to Induce Labor in Case of PROM (RUBAPRO2) (RUBAPRO2)

January 23, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Balloon + Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol to Induce Labor in Case of Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM) at Term in Nulliparous: a Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO2).

Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term complicates 6 to 22% of singleton pregnancies. Spontaneous labour occurs in 60-67% of these patients within 24h. If no effective uterine contraction occurs, induction of labour (IOL) is the strategy recommended by the French as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The optimal strategy for IOL in case of PROM with an unfavourable cervix remains unknown and none of the studies conducted in nulliparous women showed the superiority of one induction method over another.

In the current project, we aimed to determine (1) if IOL with association of balloon catheter and oxytocin after 6 hours could increase the rate of delivery < 24h versus low dose of oral misoprostol (25 µg oral PGE1 every 2h) in case of PROM at term in nulliparous women and (2) patient satisfaction using EXIT survey assessed before hospital discharge.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Context : Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term complicates 6 to 22% of singleton pregnancies. Spontaneous labour occurs in 60-67% of these patients within 24hours. If no effective uterine contraction occurs, induction of labour (IOL) is the strategy recommended by the French as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The optimal strategy for IOL in case of PROM with an unfavourable cervix remains unknown and none of the studies conducted in nulliparous women showed the superiority of one induction method over another1. Oral misoprostol (ProstaglandinE1, PGE1) usually demonstrated the lowest rate of c-section after IOL in general population and balloon catheter was associated with the lowest rate of uterine hyperstimulation. Recently, a comparison 1 to 1 between these two methods was conducted in singletons with comparable results. Despite recent studies demonstrating no higher risk of infectious complications using mechanical device in the context of PROM, only prostaglandins and oxytocin are usually recommended. Recently, Devillard et al. demonstrated that the combination of balloon catheter plus oxytocin systematically infused after 6 hours increased the rate of delivery <24h compared to dinoprostone vaginal insert group (90% versus 57.5% respectively) and decreased the time between induction and delivery in nulliparous group (17.0hours versus 26.5hours).

In the current project, we aimed to determine (1) if IOL with association of balloon catheter and oxytocin after 6 hours could increase the rate of delivery < 24hours versus low dose of oral misoprostol (25 µg oral PGE1 every 2h) in case of PROM at term in nulliparous women and (2) patient satisfaction using EXIT (EXperience of Induction Tool) survey assessed before hospital discharge.

We hypothesized that the rate of delivery < 24hours will be 15% higher in the group induced with balloon + oxytocin (estimated around 85 %) compared to the misoprostol group (estimated around 70 %). Patient satisfaction concerning experience of IOL will be assessed using a validated survey- the EXperience of Induction Tool (EXIT) - translated in French language (Beckman et al., 2017). We aimed to demonstrate a difference greater than an effect-size of 0.25.

Objectives: The main objective is to demonstrate higher rate of vaginal birth <24hours by insertion of a balloon catheter + oxytocin after 6hours, versus low dose of oral misoprostol (25 µg oral PGE1 every 2hours) in case of unfavorable cervix beyond 12 hours of PROM in nulliparous and to compare patient satisfaction using EXIT survey translated in French language before hospital discharge.

The secondary objectives are:

  • To compare the rate of caesarean sections in the two groups.
  • To compare the safety related to women of both induction methods in terms of maternal morbidities, uterine hyperstimulation, maternal infections and other reported adverse events (AEs).
  • To compare the safety related to neonates of both induction methods in terms of neonatal morbidities, neonatal infections and other reported AEs.

Study type: Multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label therapeutic trial with two parallel arms.

Number of centers: 5

Study Description:

The study group is the balloon catheter group with addition of oxytocin as early as 6h after the catheter insertion. After 12 hours of balloon insertion, induction of labour is continued by oxytocin alone. The control group corresponds to induction with misoprostol 25µg given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose is delivered every 2 hours until labour onset with a maximum of 8 administrations. Oxytocin can be started at least 4 hours after the last misoprostol administration.

Patients will be assigned by random allocation on a 1:1 basis in permuted blocks to either treatment group or control group using a dedicated, password-protected, SSL-encrypted website. To minimize the risk of imbalance between the study groups, the randomization will be stratified by trial site.

Primary endpoint: Hierarchical primary endpoint: (1) Proportion of patients vaginally delivered <24h and (2) patient satisfaction using EXIT survey assessed before hospital discharge.

Number of patients: 520

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

520

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94275
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris- CHU Bicêtre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dominique LUTON
      • Saint-Étienne, France, 42270
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Toulouse
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe Vayssière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years old,
  • Pregnant, Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
  • Singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation
  • Nulliparous
  • PROM without labour beyond 12 hours
  • Unfavourable cervix (Bischop score < 6)
  • Able to give her informed consent
  • Ability to comply with the requirement of the study
  • Covered by the French Social Security welfare system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to understand French language
  • Contraindication for vaginal delivery
  • Loss of meconium amniotic fluid (LA)
  • Temperature > 38.2°C
  • Intrauterine infection
  • IUGR with Doppler anomaly
  • Fetus with expected polymalformative syndrome
  • Scarred womb
  • Suspicion of genital herpes
  • Known HIV seropositivity
  • Placenta praevia
  • Fetal death
  • Abnormal FHR (Fetal Heart Rate)
  • Contraindication to misoprostol:

    • Allergy or hypersensibility
    • Suspicion or confirmation of a scarred uterus following past surgical intervention
    • Renal insufficiency
    • Malformation of the uterus
  • Contraindication to balloon:

    • Vasa praevia, placenta praevia
    • Invasive cervical cancer
  • Contraindication to oxytocin

    • Allergy or hypersensibility
    • Dystocia
    • Fragility or excessive distension of the uterus
    • Uterine hypertonia or fetal distress when delivery is not imminent
    • Cardiovascular disorders and severe preeclampsia
    • Predisposition to amniotic embolism (in utero fetal demise, abruption).
  • Patient subject to a legal protection order (curatorship or tutorship)
  • Refusal to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Balloon+oxytocin
Mecanical cervical ripening will be done by transcervical balloon (Teleflex French Dufour catheter CH20 reference 174000). Oxytocin will be started 6 hours after balloon insertion. At H12 balloon will be removed and induction continued by oxytocin alone.
Balloon catheter is inserted by a resident or a physician under visual control. The expected volume injected in the balloon probe is 60 mL. No traction is performed on the catheter. The catheter is left in place for a maximum of 12 hours.
Intravenous oxytocin addition (preceded or followed by epidural analgesia on patient's request) will be performed 6 hours after insertion of balloon catheter. Oxytocin is administered as an intravenous infusion (5 IU of oxytocin in 49 mL of 5% glucose*) at the lowest possible dose with the aim of achieving a maximum of three to four contractions per ten minutes. After appropriate uterine activity has been achieved, the rate of the oxytocin infusion is decreased or stopped.
Active Comparator: Oral misoprostol
Patients will receive misoprostol 25 micrograms given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose will be given every 2 hours until beginning of labor with a maximum of 8 administrations. (Oxytocin can be started at least 4 hours after the last misoprostol administration if patient remains not in labour.)
Patients will receive misoprostol 25 micrograms given orally (oral prostaglandin E1). The same dose will be given every 2 hours until beginning of labor with a maximum of 8 administrations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaginal delivery <24hours
Time Frame: at birth
Proportion of patients vaginally delivered <24hours (in %)
at birth
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: up to 4 days
Satisfaction of women concerning method of induction by the EXperience of Induction Tool (EXIT) validated in french language.
up to 4 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration from rupture to beginning of induction
Time Frame: at birth
in hours
at birth
Duration between IOL and delivery
Time Frame: at birth
in hours
at birth
Duration of balloon exposure or misoprostol exposure
Time Frame: at birth
in hours
at birth
Misoprostol received
Time Frame: at birth
Total dose of misoprostol received (in µg)
at birth
Bishop score on balloon removal
Time Frame: at birth
(comprised between 0 and 13)
at birth
Balloon in place (yes/no)
Time Frame: at birth
Rate of balloon in place (%) at 12 hours after the beginning of induction
at birth
Duration between induction and full cervical dilatation
Time Frame: at birth
Duration (in hours)
at birth
Mode of delivery
Time Frame: at birth
Rate in %
at birth
Post-partum hemorrhage
Time Frame: up to 4 days
Rate in %
up to 4 days
Rate of fever
Time Frame: during labor
Rate in %
during labor
Rate of patients experiencing episode(s) of uterine hyperstimulation
Time Frame: during labor
Rate of patients experiencing episode(s) of uterine hyperstimulation (%) during labour (defined by the necessity to interrupt oxytocin and/or to inject pharmacological agents in the context of excessive number of contractions with or without abnormal FHR),
during labor
Endometritis
Time Frame: up to 4 days
Rate of endometritis in %
up to 4 days
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 4 days
Duration (in days)
up to 4 days
Birth weight of the newborn
Time Frame: at birth
in grammes
at birth
Apgar score < 7
Time Frame: 5min after birth
Neonatal endpoint (yes/no)
5min after birth
pH umbilical artery
Time Frame: at birth
pH at the umbilical artery
at birth
Base defect and lactate (umbilical artery)
Time Frame: at birth
mmol/L
at birth
Neonatal tranfer
Time Frame: up to 4 days
Rate of neonatal transfer to intensive care unit or neonatology unit
up to 4 days
maternal-fetal infection
Time Frame: up to 4 days
Rate of maternal-fetal infection in %
up to 4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe