The Effect of Web-Based and Face-to-face Training Given to Office Workers on Health Beliefs and Physical Activity Levels Regarding Obesity

October 25, 2023 updated by: Metin Yildiz, Sakarya University

Aim: This study was evaluated to compare the effects of web-based and face-to- face education given to office workers on health beliefs and physical activity levels towards obesity.

Material and Method: The research was conducted as a randomized controlled experimental study. The study population consisted of 768 office workers between February 2020 and April 2021, and the sample of the research consisted of 90 individuals selected from the population using the improbable random sampling method. "Descriptive Feature Form," "Obesity Health Belief Model Scale," "Physical Activity Questionnaire" were used to collect data. In the analysis of data; percentile distribution, chi-square, Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact test, t-test in independent groups, Repeated Measures ANOVA Test, Friedman Test, One Way ANOVA test, Kruskall Wallis test, and post hoc analyzes (Bonferroni, Games Howell, Dunn) were used.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sakarya, Turkey, 54000
        • Sakarya University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having a body mass index of 30 and above,
  • Being able to use a computer
  • Having a desk job (Group from civil servant to manager)
  • Not have a physical disability that would prevent physical activity,
  • For women, not being pregnant,
  • Willingness to participate in the research.
  • Having internet access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Using weight-loss drugs
  • Going to a dietitian
  • Being on a diet
  • Exercising

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Face-to-face training
Face-to-face training group: In the study, the trainings were given face to face in a meeting room suitable for individuals. Documents were explained and animations and interviews were watched.
Face-to-face training
web-based training
Experimental: web-based training
web-based training Group:In the study, trainings were given to individuals through the website established. Training videos, animations, interviews and documents have been added to the website.
Face-to-face training
web-based training
No Intervention: Control group
Control group: No application has been made.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity level
Time Frame: To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.

Physical activity level Measures: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire(IPAQ) was used.

When evaluating the activities of individuals, it is accepted that each activity is done for at least 10 minutes. "MET-min/week" score is obtained by multiplying "metabolic equivalent (MET) value", "day" and "minute" for each activity level.

The MET energy values for IPAQ are as follows:

"Walk = 3.3 MET" "Moderate-intensity physical activity = 4.0 METs" "Vigorous physical activity = 8.0 METs" Insufficient physical activity level 0 < Total MET-min/week < 600 Low level of physical activity sufficient 600 ≤ Total MET-min/week < 3000 Physical activity level sufficient 3000 ≥ MET-min/week

To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.
Health Belief Model Scale in Obesity
Time Frame: To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.
Health Belief Model Scale in Obesity Scale: Developed by Dedeli and Fadıloğlu in 2010, Health Belief Model Scale in Obesity Scale evaluates individuals' beliefs and attitudes towards weight loss. The cronbach alpha coefficient of the scale, which consists of a total of 32 items, is 0.80. The scores of the items belonging to each sub-scale of the scale are calculated by summing.Health Belief Model Scale in Obesity Scale sub dimensions: Importance of Health Perceived Sensitivity Perceived Severity Perceived Benefit Perceived Obstacle In the study, the increase in the score in the relevant sub-dimension indicates that the attitude in the relevant sub-dimension increased.
To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.
Body Mass Index Measures: Measurements were made with scales and meters. Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2.
To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.
Effect on sitting times
Time Frame: To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.

Effect on sitting times: How many hours do you sit in a day? created with the question.It was asked through the questionnaire.

It shows that the situation worsens as the sitting time increases.

To the participants; initial assessment was made; Evaluation was made at the end of the 3rd month; Evaluation was done at the end of the 6th month. A total of 6 months of evaluation was made.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Metin YILDIZ, Dr., Sakarya University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Dedeli Ö, Fadiloğlu C. Development and evaluation of the health belief model scale in obesity. TAF Prev Med Bull, 2011; 10: 533-542.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Face-to-face training

Subscribe