A Retrospective, Multicenter, Controlled Clinical Trail: to Evaluate the Efficiency and Safety of Intracranial Aneurysm Assistive Software in the Preoperative Assessment

December 13, 2022 updated by: Wang Shuo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
the goal of this clinical trail is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of intracranial aneurysm assistive software in the preoperative assessment. The trail is designed as retrospective, multicenter, controlled clinical trail. Collecting probable cases images retrospectively according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria strictly. Controlling bias strictly, to make sure the efficiency and safety of intracranial aneurysm assistive software is evaluated reliably and precisely. In our trail, software-assisstant planning controls against experienced-surgeon-independent planning,which aims to avoid bias effictively and eliminate non-test interferences.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Chinese

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged 18-80y, no gender limitation.
  2. non-ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysm with specific intracranial CTA images; Target aneurysm has performed intravascular coiling treatment.
  3. intracranial aneurysm diameter range from 3mm to 10mm.
  4. the shape of aneurysm is regular without daughter sac or more than 2 lobulations.

Inclusion criteria of images:

  1. the number of detector rows of Computed Tomography(CT) is more than 16 rows.
  2. slice thickness ≤ 0.625mm, whole-brain image is considered.
  3. Both plain scan sequences and enhancer sequence are required.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. combined with cerebral hemorrhage;
  2. combined with cerevascular malformation or cerebral occupying lesion;
  3. fusiform aneurysm or dissection aneurysm;
  4. significant proximal stenosis of parent artery;
  5. intracaverous internal carotid artery aneurysm;
  6. target aneurysm has been performed flow-diverter stents treatment.

Exclusion criteria of images:

  1. none DICOM format;
  2. quality score less than 3 scores;
  3. metal artifacts existance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
surgeon-independent group
the coiling diameter is predicted by experienced surgeon alone.
surgeon-software-assistant group
the coiling diameter is predicted by experienced surgeon with software assistant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
concordance rate
Time Frame: accessment time point : immediately after computational coiling diameter assessment finished.

the optimal coiling diameter used in surgery is considered as "gold standard". The concordance rate is defined as computational suitable coiling diameter in test group differs gold standard less than ±1mm.

concordance rate=the number of concordance matched/totle enrolled number*100%

accessment time point : immediately after computational coiling diameter assessment finished.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
coincidence rate
Time Frame: accessment time point: immediately after computational coiling diameter assessment finished.

the optimal coiling diameter used in surgery is considered as "gold standard". The coincidence rate is defined as computational suitable coiling diameter in test group is less than gold standard.

coincidence rate= the number meets coincidence requirement /totle enrolled *100%

accessment time point: immediately after computational coiling diameter assessment finished.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shuo Wang, MD, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 20, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracranial Aneurysm

3
Subscribe