Does Motor Imagery Training Enhance Control of Movement in Older Adults?

December 29, 2022 updated by: Jennifer Jakobi, University of British Columbia

Motor Imagery Training, Force Steadiness and Neural Drive

The goal of this clinical trial is learn about motor imagery training (i.e. imagining a task) with healthy older adults. The main question this clinical trial aims to answer is:

• Will imagining a task improve control of force during an elbow flexion muscle contraction in healthy older adults?

Participants will:

  • Complete questionaries about general activity levels and ability to imagine tasks
  • Perform either motor imagery training or watch a documentary
  • Perform maximal and submaximal elbow flexion contractions

Researchers will compare the motor imagery training with the control group to see if control of force is improved in the motor imagery training group.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Motor imagery training could be beneficial in rehabilitative settings when participants are not physically capable of preforming a motor task or in injury prevention scenarios such as when multiple repetitions of a motor task should not be performed. If the effects of motor imagery training are favourable then they could have meaningful influence on the performance of steady movements in older adults who experience declines in force steadiness with age. Therefore, the first aim of this study will be to determine if one session of motor imagery training will influence corticospinal excitability in older adults and improve force steadiness during isometric elbow flexion contractions with the observed benefit being greater in females. The second aim of this study will be to determine if there is an associated change in oscillations in common synaptic input to motor neurons with a change in force steadiness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 90 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy older adults aged 65 to 90 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. have had an injury or orthopaedic surgery to the arm or shoulder in the prior 6 months
  2. are involved in high levels of upper-body strength training
  3. have history of training in fine motor tasks (i.e., musicians)
  4. have a history of MIT
  5. have systemic diseases and/or nerve damage affecting neuromuscular function
  6. have severe cognitive impairment
  7. are unable to read or speak English fluently
  8. are left hand dominant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motor Imagery Training
Participants will do motor imagery training in 5 minute blocks for a total of 20 minutes.
Participants imagine themselves through their own eyes performing submaximal elbow flexion contractions.
No Intervention: Control
Participants will watch a documentary in 5 minute blocks for a total of 20 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Force steadiness
Time Frame: Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session
Measured as the the coefficient in variation of force
Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session
Corticospinal excitability
Time Frame: Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session
Measured as the peak-to-peak amplitude of a motor evoked potential
Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session
Common synaptic input
Time Frame: Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session
Estimated from motor unit discharge times.
Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal elbow flexion force
Time Frame: Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session
The total amount of force produced during a maximal contraction
Within one session: Change from baseline (immediately before session) to 20 minutes after the session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Jakobi, PhD, University of British Columbia- Okanagan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MIT&ForceSteadiness

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Motor imagery training

Subscribe