Motor Imagery BCI Rehabilitation After Stroke

May 16, 2022 updated by: Mälardalen University

Motor Imagery and Real-time Feedback in Stroke Rehabilitation

This research project will investigate motor imagery training in stroke rehabilitation during which patients receive feedback in real time from their brain activity measured with ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG). The investigators hypothesize that the feedback training allows to internally stimulate brain motor networks in order to promote functional recovery of the hand.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will be carried out as an explorative study in order to investigate the benefits of mental imagery training of hand movements guided through Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) feedback after stroke. Stroke patients will be trained to mentally imagine the opening and closing of the hand (hereafter named MI, Motor Imagery). During the training, the patients will receive visual feedback in real time that reflects the neural activity related to motor processes. The NeuroFeedback (NF) will be projected with minimal time delay to maximize the neural learning. This type of brain training with feedback is thought to have significant importance to stimulate the ability of the brain to reorganize and compensate for a damaged region.

Each participant will go through the following data collection procedure (total of 33 measurement sessions per RP):

Week 1-3:

Clinical baseline evaluations, 1 time/week MRI measurements, 1 time/week during 2 weeks. Baseline EEG recordings, 1 time/week Week 4-7 MI-neurofeedback training 3 times/week Clinical intervention evaluation, 1 time/week Week 8-10 Same as week 1-3

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measurements. The MRI exam will be carried out on a Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma 3T scanner (head-coil with 20 channels) at baseline and at final assessment session at Stockholm University Brain Imaging Centre. The MRI protocol comprises i) anatomical whole brain spin-echo T1 and T2 weighted sequences for description of lesion size and location ii) acquisition of T2*-weighted gradient echo EPI-BOLD images of the whole brain for assessment of resting state functional connectivity of sensorimotor networks (resting-state functional MRI (fMRI)), and iii) the same sequence as the previous with rest interleaved by a motor imagery paradigm further described below.

Motor Imagery (MI) paradigm. The paradigm consists of instructing RP, by the use of a mirrored computer screen, to either i) rest his/her mind with eyes closed, ii) mentally imagine a hand movement (MI), or ii) execute a hand movement. The hand movements that are instructed are either to close the hand or to open the hand and extend the fingers. RP will perform several repetitions of each hand movement (MI and execution) in order to collect a statistical basis.

Baseline EEG recording. During the baseline EEG recordings, RP will be seated in front a computer screen and perform the MI paradigm (described above). During these session, EEG, EOG, EMG, and accelerometer-data will be collected and are further described below.

ElectroEncephaloGram (EEG), ElectroOculoGram (EOG), ElectroMyoGram (EMG) and accelerometer equipment. The EEG equipment consists of a 64-electrode scalp EEG acquisition system (Brain Products ActiCHamp). The 64 electrodes (active Ag/AgCl) will be distributed according to the extended 10-20 reference placement system. In addition to the EEG recording, 3 electrodes (passive Ag/AgCl, Brain Products) will be placed on each side of both eyes and on the earlob to measure eye-movements during the experiment (EOG). EMG electrodes (passive Ag/AgCl, Brain Products) will be placed over four muscles controlling the wrist and fingers according to a standardized protocol. Two accelerometer-sensors (Brain Products) will be placed on the hand and the index finger in order to record movement-related activity.

EEG, EOG, EMG and accelerometer data analysis. The recorded data will be further analyzed offline in order to evaluate the characteristic features in the data that best describe MI of hand movements. This will be performed in Matlab and Labview combining custom-made scripts with already developed toolboxes (such as EEGLab, Chronux). Features to be evaluated will include the evoked activity, the time-frequency spectra, phase, correlation coefficients, coherency among other. When the feature that best describes MI has been identified different classifier and pattern recognition methods will be evaluated in extracting the information. Intelligent algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM), regularized linear regression, naïve Bayes classifiers among others will be evaluated and compared. These are commonly used methods in the field of neurotechnology and a prior comparison-study using neural data from invasive recordings shows the importance of choosing a well-adapted classifier for extracting information.

MI-NeuroFeedback Training (NFT). EEG, EOG, EMG and accelerometer-data will be collected as described in the section "EEG, EMG and accelerometer equipment". RP will perform the MI paradigm without the execution of hand movements. Real-time feedback from recorded EEG-activity will be provided to RP during MI. The feedback consists of a virtual hand on a computer screen whose movements reflect the brain activity of RP related to MI. The recorded data will be further analyzed offline with the analytic tools that are described in previous section.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 11418
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Stockholn University Brain Imaging Centre
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 18288
        • Recruiting
        • Department of rehabilitation medicine at Danderyd University
        • Contact:
      • Västerås, Sweden, 72123
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Sweden Mälardalen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

> 6 months since first time stroke onset and with remaining hemiparesis in upper extremity; able to participate fully in the intervention, able to perform Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI); able to passively extend the wrist 15 degrees and extend fingers fully with a neutral position of the wrist.

In addition, participants need to be able to voluntarily control the power of their grip when requested according to the Visuomotor force tracking method and/or according to the clinical assessment of a therapist (while holding the patient´s hand). According to the Fugl- Meyer Upper Extremity (UE) scale participants should accomplish <14 points on the hand subscale and <2 points in finger flexion and extension (C) in addition to < 47 points on the total motor score (equivalent to moderate disability in the upper extremity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other neurological or musculoskeletal disease/injury, or contagious disease.
  • If the research person is regularly treated with botulinum toxin in the upper extremity, 3 weeks should have passed before the first baseline assessment.
  • current or history of epilepsy,
  • severe hearing or visual impairments,
  • metal implants in the brain/skull cochlear implants,
  • any implanted neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker or cardiac implants of metal, infusion device,
  • any other neurological disorder,
  • pregnancy,
  • current or history of severe psychiatric disorder with need for pharmacological treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motor Imagery BCI training
Complete intervention with motor imagery BCI training. Patients recruited by physiotherapists who underwent baseline evaluations with clinical tests, fMRI and EEG measurements. Patients will after intervention perform clinical tests, fMRI, and EEG measurements to evaluate outcomes of intervention.
Motor Imagery (MI)-BCI training, 2-3 hours, 3 times/week for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale score (0-66 points)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Arm and hand function
Up to 10 weeks
Change of EEG alpha and beta activity
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Brain motor network activity reflected in BCI feedback
Up to 10 weeks
Change of fMRI BOLD activity
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Brain motor network activity
Up to 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of monofilament test score
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Two point discrimination and monofilament test for sensory function
Up to 10 weeks
Change of box and block test score (0-150)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Gross manual dexterity
Up to 10 weeks
Change of JAMAR® digital Hand Dynamometer scores (0-90)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Grip strength
Up to 10 weeks
Change of visuomotor force-tracking task scores
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Quantification of timing and precision aspects of force grip modulation
Up to 10 weeks
Change of stroke Impact Scale 16 scores (15-80 points)
Time Frame: Up to 10 weeks
Activity limitations related to physical function
Up to 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elaine Astrand, PhD, Mälardalen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Motor imagery BCI training

3
Subscribe