- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05800470
The Effects of fNIRS-based Neurofeedback Training on Balance and Gait in Parkinson's Disease
The Novel Application of fNIRS-based Neurofeedback to Enhance Effects of Motor Imagery on Balance and Gait Performance in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ray-Yau Wang
- Phone Number: +88628267210
- Email: rywang@nycu.edu.tw
Study Locations
-
-
None Selected
-
Taipei, None Selected, Taiwan, 112
- Recruiting
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
-
Contact:
- Ray-Yau Wang, Ph.D
- Phone Number: 88628267210
- Email: rywang@nycu.edu.tw
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ray-Yau Wang, Ph.D
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Part 1
Additional Inclusion Criteria for PD:
- diagnosis of idiopathic PD by neurologist with Hoehn and Yahr stage < 4;
- stable medical condition;
- capability of walking independently without walking devices.
Exclusion Criteria:
- cognitive impairment indicated by MMSE score < 24;
- motor imagery ability indicated by KVIQ score < 25;
- unable recognize 26 letters in the English alphabet
- history of diseases or conditions known to interfere with participating this study (e.g. epilepsy, metal implants in the brain, or deep brain stimulation);
- diagnosis of any other neurological disease or psychiatric disorder (e.g. stroke, anxiety disorder, or depression);
- using central nervous system medications other than for PD, e.g. antiepileptic drugs in recent 3 months.
Part 2
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 40-85 y/o;
- diagnosis of idiopathic PD by neurologist with Hoehn and Yahr stage < 4;
- stable medical condition;
- capability of walking independently for 10 minutes, which is the time needed for imagery walking training in order to eliminate the possible influence of physical fatigue.
Exclusion Criteria:
- cognitive impairment indicated by MMSE score < 24;
- history of diseases or conditions known to interfere with participating this study (e.g. epilepsy, metal implants in the brain, or deep brain stimulation);
- diagnosis of any other neurological disease or psychiatric disorder (e.g. stroke, anxiety disorder, or depression);
- using central nervous system medications other than for PD, e.g. antiepileptic drugs in recent 3 months.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Neurofeedback combined with MI (NFB-MI)
Participants in both NFB-MI and MI groups will receive a total of 12 sessions of training in 4 weeks. NFB-MI group will receive fNIRS-based neurofeedback during MI training in lab. Prior to each NFB-MI session, participants will watch a video of a person executing balance tasks and walking in different environments. The explicit instruction will be given by the researcher. Each MI training session (consisting of 5 trials for balance and walking tasks) includes 45 seconds of imagery tasks followed by 15 seconds of rest, repeated twice. The training will take approximately 20 minutes. Visual feedback with a thermometer based on the changes of HbO concentration will be displayed on the screen during NFB-MI training. In each training session, actual balance and gait tasks will be practiced for 20 min. The difficulty of the tasks will be modified individually for each participant. |
A multichannel wearable fNIRS (NIRSport2, NIRx Medical Technologies LLC, Glen Head, NY, USA) will be used to detect the cortical activity in SMA.
The HbO concentration will be processed and displayed as a visual feedback during MI training.
The tasks for balance and gait training are similar to those during the MI training.
The difficulty of the tasks will be modified individually for each participant.
The researcher will ensure the safety.
|
|
Active Comparator: Motor imagery
Participants in both NFB-MI and MI groups will receive a total of 12 sessions of training in 4 weeks. MI group will practice kinesthetic MI under supervision in lab setting. Participants will watch a video of a person executing balance tasks and walking in different environments before MI training. The explicit instruction will be given by the researcher. Each MI training session (consisting of 5 trials for balance and walking tasks) includes 45 seconds of imagery tasks followed by 15 seconds of rest, repeated twice. The training will take approximately 20 minutes. In each training session, actual balance and gait tasks will be practiced for 20 min after MI training. The difficulty of the tasks will be modified individually for each participant. The researcher will ensure the safety of executing each task during lab visit. |
The tasks for balance and gait training are similar to those during the MI training.
The difficulty of the tasks will be modified individually for each participant.
The researcher will ensure the safety.
Prior to each task, participants will watch a video of a person executing balance tasks and walking tasks.
The balance tasks will include static and dynamic standing tasks such as sit-to-stand, tandem stance, standing on a balance board, reaching out to different directions and single leg stance.
The walking tasks consists of tandem walking, crossing obstacles, sideward walking, backward walking, and turning.
The participants will be asked to kinesthetically imagine movements in the first-person perspective, and the researcher will give the explicit instruction encouraging them to focus on the feeling (i.e.
tactile, proprioceptive and kinesthetic sensations).
Each MI session consists of 10-min of balance tasks and 10-min of walking tasks.
|
|
Active Comparator: Motor training
The tasks for balance and gait training are similar to those during the MI training.
The balance and gait training will be practiced for 20 min in MI and NFB-MI groups, and will be practiced for 40 min in MT group.
The difficulty of the tasks will be modified individually for each participant.
The researcher will ensure the safety.
|
The tasks for balance and gait training are similar to those during the MI training.
The difficulty of the tasks will be modified individually for each participant.
The researcher will ensure the safety.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-perceived fatigue for general fatigue level
Time Frame: Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 1 of the study)
|
Traditional Chinese version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-TC) will be used to measure subjective perception of fatigue.
MFI-TC is a 20-item self-report scale evaluating different dimensions of fatigue (general fatigue/physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue).
Each item is scored on a 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) scale to assess how well the statement describe the participant's experience of fatigue.
Ten positively phrased items (item 2, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19) were reverse-scored before adding up scores.
The total score obtained simply by adding 20-item scores together (i.e., 20-100), with higher scores indicating more fatigue.
|
Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 1 of the study)
|
|
Motor imagery ability
Time Frame: Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 1 of the study and day 8 for second assessment)
|
The walking tasks during motor imagery: walkways of 5 m in length, and 35 cm in width.
Participants will be asked to stand upright at the starting line, and then perform imagery walking (IW) and actual walking (AW) task in a total of 2 sessions in the following sequence: IW- walkway (35cm), and AW- walkway.
Each session contains three repeated trials of walking over 5 m walkways.
The MI ability will be indicated by the index of performance (IP) calculated by [(AW - IW/ AW) * 100].
IP closer to zero indicates better MI ability.
|
Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 1 of the study and day 8 for second assessment)
|
|
Kinesthetic and visual imagery ability
Time Frame: Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 1 of the study and day 8 for second assessment)
|
Kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire-short version (KVIQ-10) will be used to assess kinesthetic and visual imagery ability.
5 movement will be demonstrated by the assessor and mimicked by the participant.
The participant will be asked to visually and kinesthetically imagine the movement without doing the movement.
The clarity of the image (visual subscale) and the intensity of the sensations (kinesthetic subscale) will be scored on a five point ordinal scale.
The total scores ranged from 10 to 50, and higher scores indicate better ability on kinesthetic and visual imagery.
|
Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 1 of the study and day 8 for second assessment)
|
|
Self-perceived fatigue for concurrent fatigue level
Time Frame: Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 8 of the study)
|
Chinese version of the Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS-C) will be used to measure subjective perception of fatigue.
Fatigue is a subscale of BRUMS-C consisted with 4-item.
Participants indicated whether they have felt on a five-point Likert scale (0 = not at all,1 = a little, 2 = moderately, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = extremely) using the "How do you feel right now?" response timeframe.
The total score obtained simply by adding 4-item scores together (i.e., 0-16), with higher scores indicating more fatigue.
|
Part 1 cross-sectional assessment (day 8 of the study)
|
|
Change of Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BEST) from pre-test to post-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test, post-test (4 weeks)
|
Mini-BEST is used to measure dynamic balance ability in four domains: anticipatory postural adjustment, reactive postural adjustments, sensory integration and dynamic gait.
Mini-BEST consists of 14 items scored on a 0-2 scale, with 2 items assess right and left sides.
The total scores will be 0-32, and higher scores indicate better balance ability.
The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at post-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test, post-test (4 weeks)
|
|
Change of Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BEST) from pre-test to follow-up
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and 4-week follow-up assessment (8 weeks)
|
Mini-BEST is used to measure dynamic balance ability in four domains: anticipatory postural adjustment, reactive postural adjustments, sensory integration and dynamic gait.
Mini-BEST consists of 14 items scored on a 0-2 scale, with 2 items assess right and left sides.
The total scores will be 0-32, and higher scores indicate better balance ability.The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at follow-up will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and 4-week follow-up assessment (8 weeks)
|
|
Change of Timed up-and-go test (TUG) from pre-test to post-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
Functional mobility will be indicated by TUG.
Participants will be asked to stand up from a chair, walk at comfortable speed for 3 m, turn around and sit back on the chair.
The completing duration will be measured, and the mean value across 3 trials of TUG will be documented as the final performance.
The shorter completing duration indicates better mobility function.
The duration at pre-test subtracting from the duration at post-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
|
Change of Timed up-and-go test (TUG) from pre-test to follow-up
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and 4-week follow-up assessment (8 weeks)
|
Functional mobility will be indicated by TUG.
Participants will be asked to stand up from a chair, walk at comfortable speed for 3 m, turn around and sit back on the chair.
The completing duration will be measured, and the mean value across 3 trials of TUG will be documented as the final performance.
The shorter completing duration indicates better mobility function.
The duration at pre-test subtracting from the duration at follow-up will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and 4-week follow-up assessment (8 weeks)
|
|
Change of gait performance from pre-test to post-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
The gait parameters will be measured by a GAITRite system (CIR system, Inc., Havertown, Pennsylvania).
The GAITRite system is a 4.57 m long, 0.9 m wide straight walkway containing pressure-sensitive sensors in a 3.66 m by 0.61 m area.
The participants will be instructed to walk along the walkway at their comfortable speed for 3 times.
The values at pre-test subtracting from the values at post-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
|
Change of gait performance from pre-test to follow-up
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and 4-week follow-up assessment (8 weeks)
|
The gait parameters will be measured by a GAITRite system (CIR system, Inc., Havertown, Pennsylvania).
The GAITRite system is a 4.57 m long, 0.9 m wide straight walkway containing pressure-sensitive sensors in a 3.66 m by 0.61 m area.
The participants will be instructed to walk along the walkway at their comfortable speed for 3 times.
The values at pre-test subtracting from the values at follow-up will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and 4-week follow-up assessment (8 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of self-perceived fatigue from pre-test to mid-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and mid-test (2 weeks)
|
Traditional Chinese version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-TC) will be used to measure subjective perception of fatigue.
MFI-TC is a 20-item self-report scale evaluating different dimensions of fatigue (general fatigue/physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue).
Each item is scored on a 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) scale to assess how well the statement describe the participant's experience of fatigue.
Ten positively phrased items (item 2, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19) were reverse-scored before adding up scores.
The total score obtained simply by adding 20-item scores together (i.e., 20-100), with higher scores indicating more fatigue.
The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at mid-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and mid-test (2 weeks)
|
|
Change of self-perceived fatigue from pre-test to post-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
Traditional Chinese version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-TC) will be used to measure subjective perception of fatigue.
MFI-TC is a 20-item self-report scale evaluating different dimensions of fatigue (general fatigue/physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue).
Each item is scored on a 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) scale to assess how well the statement describe the participant's experience of fatigue.
Ten positively phrased items (item 2, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19) were reverse-scored before adding up scores.
The total score obtained simply by adding 20-item scores together (i.e., 20-100), with higher scores indicating more fatigue.
The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at post-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
|
Change of motor imagery ability from pre-test to mid-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and mid-test (2 weeks)
|
There are two conditions for walking tasks during motor imagery: wide and narrow walkways of 15 m in length, and respectively 2 m and 35 cm in width.
participants will be asked to stand upright at the starting line, and then perform imagery walking (IW) and actual walking (AW) task in a total of four sessions in the following sequence: IW-wide walkway (2m), AW-wide walkway, IW-narrow walkway (35cm), and AW-narrow walkway.
Each session contains three repeated trials of walking over 15 m wide or narrow walkways.
The MI ability will be indicated by the index of performance (IP) calculated by [(AW - IW/ AW) * 100].
IP closer to zero indicates better MI ability.
The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at mid-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and mid-test (2 weeks)
|
|
Change of motor imagery ability from pre-test to post-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
There are two conditions for walking tasks during motor imagery: wide and narrow walkways of 15 m in length, and respectively 2 m and 35 cm in width.
participants will be asked to stand upright at the starting line, and then perform imagery walking (IW) and actual walking (AW) task in a total of four sessions in the following sequence: IW-wide walkway (2m), AW-wide walkway, IW-narrow walkway (35cm), and AW-narrow walkway.
Each session contains three repeated trials of walking over 15 m wide or narrow walkways.
The MI ability will be indicated by the index of performance (IP) calculated by [(AW - IW/ AW) * 100].
IP closer to zero indicates better MI ability.
The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at post-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
|
Change of kinesthetic and visual imagery ability from pre-test to mid-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and mid-test (2 weeks)
|
Kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire-short version (KVIQ-10) will be used to assess kinesthetic and visual imagery ability.
5 movement will be demonstrated by the assessor and mimicked by the participant.
The participant will be asked to visually and kinesthetically imagine the movement without doing the movement.
The clarity of the image (visual subscale) and the intensity of the sensations (kinesthetic subscale) will be scored on a five point ordinal scale.
The total scores ranged from 10 to 50, and higher scores indicate better ability on kinesthetic and visual imagery.
The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at mid-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and mid-test (2 weeks)
|
|
Change of kinesthetic and visual imagery ability from pre-test to post-test
Time Frame: Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
Kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire-short version (KVIQ-10) will be used to assess kinesthetic and visual imagery ability.
5 movement will be demonstrated by the assessor and mimicked by the participant.
The participant will be asked to visually and kinesthetically imagine the movement without doing the movement.
The clarity of the image (visual subscale) and the intensity of the sensations (kinesthetic subscale) will be scored on a five point ordinal scale.
The total scores ranged from 10 to 50, and higher scores indicate better ability on kinesthetic and visual imagery.
The scores at pre-test subtracting from the scores at post-test will be presented.
|
Part 2 pre-test and post-test (4 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ray-Yau Wang, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Synucleinopathies
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Mental Disorders
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Parkinsonian Disorders
- Basal Ganglia Diseases
- Personality Disorders
- Somatoform Disorders
- Histrionic Personality Disorder
- Movement Disorders
- Parkinson Disease
- Conversion Disorder
- Hysteria
Other Study ID Numbers
- NYCU112020AE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson Disease (PD) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseTurkey (Türkiye)
-
CND Life SciencesDigestive Disease Associates of CTRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseUnited States
-
Neuron23 Inc.Roche Diagnostic Ltd.; Qiagen Manchester LimitedRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Idiopathic Parkinson Disease | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | Early Parkinson Disease (Early PD)United States, Spain, Israel, Poland, Italy, United Kingdom
-
San Francisco Neurology and Sleep CenterNot yet recruitingPARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseUnited States
-
Haukeland University HospitalUniversity of Bergen; SPARK NSRecruitingParkinson Disease (PD) | Parkinson s DiseaseNorway
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityIstanbul University - CerrahpasaNot yet recruitingParkinson Disease | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson Disease (PD), Postural Balance
-
CND Life SciencesOregon Health and Science UniversityRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)United States
-
Università degli Studi dell'InsubriaUniversidade Nova de Lisboa; Associazione Parkinson Insubria (AsPI), Section... and other collaboratorsRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)Italy
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedParkinson Disease 6, Early-Onset | Parkinson Disease (Autosomal Recessive, Early Onset) 7, Human | Parkinson Disease Autosomal Recessive, Early Onset | Parkinson Disease, Autosomal Recessive Early-Onset, Digenic, Pink1/Dj1United States
-
Duke UniversityMedical University of South Carolina; Massachusetts General Hospital; Mayo Clinic and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingGut Microbiota | Gut Microbiome | Parkinson Disease (PD) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Prodromal Parkinsons DiseaseUnited States
Clinical Trials on fNIRS-based neurofeedback with motor imagery
-
CESPU-Escola Superior de Tecnologias da Saúde de...ICVS - Life and Health Sciences Research InstituteCompletedStroke | Upper Limb Rehabilitation
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingIndividuals With C6-C7 Tetraplegia (AIS A or B)France
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Virginia Polytechnic...CompletedCerebellar Ataxia | Spinocerebellar Ataxias | Cerebellar DegenerationUnited States
-
Kessler FoundationRecruitingStroke | Dyslexia, AcquiredUnited States
-
Shenyang Medical CollegeThe Second Hospital of Shenyang Medical CollegeRecruitingAnxiety Disorders | Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)China
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Science Council, TaiwanRecruitingAnxiety DisordersTaiwan
-
Istinye UniversityNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord InjuryTurkey
-
Ege UniversityThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyCompletedMotor Imagery Training | Virtual Reality | Resistance TrainingTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Technical University of LisbonCentro de Medicina de Reabilitação de AlcoitãoRecruiting
-
Green International UniversityCompletedComplex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) | Shoulder Hand SyndromePakistan