Rehabilitation of Airway Protection in Parkinson's Disease

September 19, 2025 updated by: Michelle Troche, Teachers College, Columbia University

Rehabilitation of Airway Protection in Parkinson's Disease: Comparing In-person and Telehealth Service Delivery Models

Airway protective disorders are a prevalent and progressive consequence of Parkinson's Disease (PD), and often result in aspiration pneumonia which is the leading cause of death in PD. Despite this, a large number of patients with PD do not access specialized services to address these critical deficits. The investigators will examine the comparative effectiveness of a novel treatment paradigm delivered in-person versus via telehealth in persons with PD, as well as the role of patient burden and treatment adherence on outcomes; thus, the proposed research is relevant to public health and in line with NIH's mission to identify novel, efficacious, and accessible rehabilitation strategies for short- and long-term improvement of dysfunctional airway protection in PD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Progressive disorders of airway protection, such as swallowing disorders (dysphagia) and cough disorders (dystussia), are highly prevalent in PD and have significant negative implications for health and quality of life. In fact, aspiration pneumonia, commonly associated with dysphagia/dystussia, is a leading cause of death in PD. Despite this, there is currently no established standard of care for the treatment of airway protective disorders in this population. Even more critically, approximately 40% of individuals with PD in the United States do not access rehabilitation services or receive specialized care for these potentially life-threatening airway protective deficits. Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST) and Cough Skill Training (CST) have been found to improve airway protective disorders in PD and be feasible via telehealth. However, a significant clinical-research gap remains in that it has not been demonstrated that clinical outcomes are comparable (non-inferior) when these treatments are delivered via telehealth versus in-person. This gap limits access to these important services with detrimental effects to health and quality of life. The long-term goal of this line of research is to improve the health outcomes of individuals with PD, specifically as they relate to airway protective dysfunction. The objective of this application is to pair EMST + CST - and compare clinical and patient-centered outcomes when conducted in-person versus via telehealth in the short- and the long-term. Also, the investigators will assess the role of specific patient burden factors and resultant treatment adherence on clinical outcomes. Therefore, the aims of this study are to: 1) Compare clinical and patient-centered outcomes following four weeks of intensive in-person vs. telehealth EMST+CST treatment in persons with PD, 2) Compare clinical and patient-centered outcomes from a long-term EMST+CST maintenance program offered in-person vs. via telehealth in persons with PD, and 3) Identify the role of specific patient burden factors (i.e., geographic location, cognitive function, disease severity, and caregiver burden) on treatment adherence in the short- and long-term and the influence of treatment adherence on clinical outcomes. The investigators will achieve these aims by conducting a two-arm, two site, randomized clinical trial in 120 people with PD comparing in-person vs. telehealth EMST+CST treatment after a four-week intensive period (aim1) and after a one year maintenance treatment period (with assessments at six and 12 months - aim 2). The investigators anticipate our findings will result in immediately translatable clinical deliverables that will have broad impact for reduced burden and improved accessibility of treatment. Further, these findings will inform our future studies investigating these treatments and service delivery models on long-term outcomes (i.e., aspiration pneumonia, hospitalization, death), accessibility, and healthcare costs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47907
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10027
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Teachers College, Columbia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Diagnosed with PD (Hoehn and Yahr Stages II-IV)126,127 confirmed by a Movement Disorders fellowship trained neurologist having reviewed the video recorded Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assessment for each participant and using strict UK brain bank criteria
  • airway protective deficits as defined as a minimum of penetration of thin liquids (penetration-aspiration score>3) as determined by instrumental swallowing assessment and/or dystussia as determined by voluntary cough assessment (PEFR ≤4.1 L/s)
  • not actively receiving exercise-based swallowing therapy
  • between the ages of 50 and 90.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Other neurological disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, stroke, brain tumor, etc.)
  • history of head and neck cancer
  • history of breathing disorders or diseases (e.g., COPD)
  • history of smoking in the last five years
  • uncontrolled hypertension
  • difficulty complying due to neuropsychological dysfunction (i.e., severe depression with >28 on the Beck Depression Index (BDI-II), dementia with <19 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA))
  • allergy to capsaicin or barium
  • further than 1.5 hours (door to door) distance from either Teachers College, Columbia University or Purdue University.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telehealth

Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST). EMST is a widely used and efficacious treatment approach that uses a calibrated device with a one-way, spring-loaded pressure relief valve to mechanically overload the expiratory and submental muscles.

Cough Skill Training (CST) involves a digital peak flow meter device which measures PEFR (peak expiratory flow rate) in liters/second and allows patients to receive immediate biofeedback.

Active Comparator: In-person

Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST). EMST is a widely used and efficacious treatment approach that uses a calibrated device with a one-way, spring-loaded pressure relief valve to mechanically overload the expiratory and submental muscles.

Cough Skill Training (CST) involves a digital peak flow meter device which measures PEFR (peak expiratory flow rate) in liters/second and allows patients to receive immediate biofeedback.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (Cough PEFR) - phase 1
Time Frame: Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Change in Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (Cough PEFR) - phase 2
Time Frame: post-training to post one-year maintenance
post-training to post one-year maintenance
Change in Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) - phase 1
Time Frame: Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
PAS, max value: 8 (most impaired), min value 1 (least impaired).
Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Change in Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) - phase 2
Time Frame: post-training to post one-year maintenance
PAS, max value: 8 (most impaired), min value 1 (least impaired).
post-training to post one-year maintenance

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Maximum Expiratory Pressure - phase 1
Time Frame: Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Change in Maximum Expiratory Pressure - phase 2
Time Frame: post-training to post one-year maintenance
post-training to post one-year maintenance
Change in Cough expired volume - phase 1
Time Frame: Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Change in Cough expired volume - phase 2
Time Frame: post-training to post one-year maintenance
post-training to post one-year maintenance
Treatment Adherence - phase 1
Time Frame: posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
percent of prescribed training coughs and breaths completed
posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Change in Treatment Adherence- phase 2
Time Frame: post-training to post one-year maintenance
percent of prescribed training coughs and breaths completed
post-training to post one-year maintenance
Change in SWAL-QOL- phase 1
Time Frame: Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
self-report questionnaire of swallowing quality of life, 44 min score, 220 max score - higher score is better QOL
Pretraining to posttraining (after four weeks of intensive training)
Change in SWAL-QOL - phase 2
Time Frame: post-training to post one-year maintenance
self-report questionnaire of swallowing quality of life, 44 min score, 220 max score - higher score is better QOL
post-training to post one-year maintenance

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelle Troche, PhD, Teachers College, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe