Comparison of Cryotherapy and Peeling Agent in the Treatment of Common Warts

January 26, 2023 updated by: Dr kiran gul, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad

Cryotherapy Versus Topical Tricholoacetic Acid 90% in Treatment of Common Warts

Objective: To compare the efficacy of cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen (cryoget method) versus trichloroacetic acid 90% (applicator method) in treatment of common warts.

Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Place And Duration of Study: Department of Dermatology, CMH Abbottabad from Jun 2022 to Nov, 2022.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this investigation by non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Sample size was calculated using WHO sample size calculator and patients were randomized into two equal groups, A and B, each comprising of 30 patients through lottery method. Patients with common warts such as hard lesions, raised lumps with rough surfaces at the back of their fingers, around nails and palm of their hands between the ages of 18 and 60 were included, whereas those with genital warts, cardiac, hepatic, renal, or hypercholesterolemia were excluded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Kpk
      • Abbottābād, Kpk, Pakistan, 22010
        • CMH Abbottabad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient presented with common warts in dermatology opd

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients with warts on toes and tip of fingers

    • genital warts
    • cardiac, hepatic and renal disease
    • hypercholesterolemia
    • hypersensitivity reactions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group A cryotherapy
Cryotherapy Group A had their warts treated once every two weeks for a total of twelve weeks, with liquid nitrogen using cryoget method for 10 to 15 seconds on each lesion (depending on size, until a narrow white rim of around 1 mm developed around it).
Drug: CRYOTHERAPY
Group A had their warts treated once every two weeks for a total of twelve weeks, with liquid nitrogen using cryoget method for 10 to 15 seconds on each lesion (depending on size, until a narrow white rim of around 1 mm developed around it).
Other Names:
  • Liquid nitrogen
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group B Topical TCA 90%
Topical TCA 90 % Warts in Group B were treated with liquid TCA 90% by an applicator every two weeks for a total of twelve weeks. After 20 minutes, patients were instructed to remove the solution by washing their warts with water or regular saline
Drug: Tricholoracetic acid
Group B were treated with liquid TCA 90% by an applicator every two weeks for a total of twelve weeks. After 20 minutes, patients were instructed to remove the solution by washing their warts with water or regular saline.
Other Names:
  • Peeling agent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of cryotherapy and Tricholoracetic acid 90% in treatment of common warts
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Outcome was determined at the end of third month and the patients were labelled as cured and the efficacy was labelled as "Yes" in cases with absence of all the lesions. After twelve weeks of therapy, individuals with persistent warts were regarded as cases of treatment failure and efficacy was labelled as "No".
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2023

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMHAbbottabad

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Warts

Clinical Trials on CRYOTHERAPY

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Morocco

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe