Cryotherapy Reduces Time to Surgery and Local Complication in Patients With Ankle Fractures (Cryotherapy)

April 29, 2024 updated by: Alessio Giai Via, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini

Third Generation Cryotherapy Reduces Time to Surgery and Local Complication in Patients With Ankle Fractures: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Ankle fractures are common injuries and cryotherapy is routinely used to reduce pain, swelling and local skin complications, both before and after surgery. However, the results on ankle surgery are contradictory. Despite the benefits of cryotherapy in the pre- and postoperative care of ankle surgery, lack of standardized protocols and few level-1 studies make difficult to appreciate the effectiveness. In addition, there's scarce evidence on the benefits from the preoperative use of cryotherapy.

The aim of this study is to report the results with the use of third generation cryotherapy in the preoperative treatment of ankle fractures. Third generation devices use computed cryotherapy to deliver gradual changes in pressure and temperature. The software produces a progressive drop in temperature and a controlled slow return to room temperature environment, avoiding reactive vasodilation. Time to surgery, pain, opioids intake, and local skin complications have been investigated.

Methods 169 patients with ankle fracture were randomized in two groups, the cryotherapy group (89 patients) and the control group (C: 80 patients). The time-to- surgery, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the analgesic drug demand (including morphine or acetaminophen) were recorded. The development of skin complications was assessed daily. BMI and number of cigarettes smoked were also recorded.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of third generation cryotherapy on time to surgery, pain, opioids intake, and local skin complications. Although the use of cryotherapy is traditionally believed to reduce pain, swelling, local skin complications and the need of analgesia, the results on ankle surgery are not well reported and still contradictory. The working hypothesis is that third generation cryotherapy is a safe, reduces time to surgery and is useful in the surgical management of ankle fractures The investigators analyzed the prospectively collected data of 169 patients with ankle fracture, treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Patients were randomized in two groups at the time of the diagnosis in the emergency department. The treatment group (T: 89 patients) were treated with a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) which was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The leg was immobilized in a walking boot which was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied. The control group (C: 80 patients) did not use cryotherapy before surgery, the leg was immobilized into a half cats and elevation of the injured limb was indicated. Patients were collected in two different hospitals (Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini -Roma and Ospedale San Paolo - Civitavecchia) between 2021 and 2023. All patients had signed a written consent, and the study was approved by the local ethic committee.

After the diagnosis was made and surgical treatment was indicated, the patient was hospitalized in the department of orthopedic and trauma surgery.

A power analysis was performed to evaluate the sample size necessary to guarantee a power of at least 0.9 with a significance level of 0.05 using preliminary data on time to surgery.

Univariate descriptive analysis of the variables under study was carried out by calculating the centrality and variability indices for the quantitative variables and frequency tables for the variables.

The homogeneity of the control group and the treatment group for the variables sex, age, type of fracture, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, venous insufficiency, and BMI class were checked. Depending on the nature of the variables, a t-test or a chi-square test was used.

Any significant differences between the treatment and control groups were assessed using independent samples t-tests for quantitative variables and chi-square tests for qualitative variables. Where the sample size was not sufficient, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test for independent samples was used.

An alpha significance level of 0.05 was used in all analyses mentioned. For the statistical analysis of data, IBM SPSS Statistics software version 28 was used

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

169

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy
        • A.O. San Camillo Forlanini
      • Rome, Italy, 00152
        • A.O. San Camillo Forlanini

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admitted to the emergency department with an ankle fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fractures
  • Fracture-dislocations which required external fixation
  • Patients with one or more associated fractures
  • Patients with a diagnose of major trauma
  • Patients who were not able to complain with the pre- and post-surgical indications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cryotherapy
Patients were treated with a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) which was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The leg was immobilized in a walking boot which was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied.
Treatment group: the ankle was immobilized in a walking boot, then a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The walking boot was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied.
Other Names:
  • Third generation cryotherapy
Active Comparator: Immobilization and elevation
The leg was immobilized into a half cats and elevation of the injured limb was indicated before surgery.
Treatment group: the ankle was immobilized in a walking boot, then a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The walking boot was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied.
Other Names:
  • Third generation cryotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to surgery
Time Frame: From enrollment to surgery
hours
From enrollment to surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS Score
Time Frame: 6 hours
VAS Score - Visual analogue scale. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 (pain as bad as it it could possibly be).
6 hours
Skin complications
Time Frame: up to surgery
The onset of preoperative skin complication as skin blisters have been recorded. complications
up to surgery
Morphine intake
Time Frame: up to surgery
Pain was evaluated as the number of Morphine vials intake
up to surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Gennaro Pipino, M.D., Prof., San Raffaele University, Milan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

May 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

May 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all IPD collected throughout the trial

IPD Sharing Time Frame

the will be available with the published manuscript, or by asking to the corresponding author under reasonable request with no time restriction

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

contacting the corresponding author (Alessio Giai Via) by e-mail

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures

Clinical Trials on Cryotherapy

Subscribe