Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic - Prostate (COMPAR-P)

April 11, 2023 updated by: Alessandro Antonelli, MD, Prof, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Comparative Evaluation of New Surgical Robotic Platforms for the Radical Prostatectomy Procedure

The object of this exploratory clinical trial is to evaluate post-operative complications in a population that underwent Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) made with multiple platforms:

  • DaVinci;
  • Hugo;
  • Versius.

The questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the estimation of the post-operative complications suggest something?
  • Are differences (intra-operative, post-operative, oncological, functional, technical, and economic) among the three intervention approaches observable?

Participants will be invited to fill out questionnaires and join one of these three groups:

  1. surgery with the daVinci platform;
  2. surgery with the Hugo platform;
  3. surgery with the Versius platform.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 and < 90 years;
  • Organ-localized prostate cancer with a surgical indication of radical prostatectomy;
  • Informed consent provided.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 and > 90 years;
  • Contraindication to radical prostatectomy procedure;
  • Non-organ confined prostate cancer;
  • Refusal to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DaVinci system
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is carried out through daVinci platform.
Assisted-robotic radical prostatectomy.
Other Names:
  • DaVinci® Surgical System
Experimental: Hugo system
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is carried out through Hugo platform.
Assisted-robotic radical prostatectomy.
Other Names:
  • Hugo™ RAS System
Experimental: Versius system
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is carried out through Versius platform.
Assisted-robotic radical prostatectomy.
Other Names:
  • Versius® Robotic Surgery System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with postoperative complications
Time Frame: Over the 4 days post surgery
Overall postoperative complications (% score >0) are considered by Clavien-Dindo Classification 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication
Over the 4 days post surgery
Number of participants with moderate to major postoperative complications
Time Frame: Over the 4 days post surgery
Moderate to major complications (% score >=2) are considered by Clavien-Dindo Classification 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication
Over the 4 days post surgery
Number of participants with major postoperative complications
Time Frame: Over the 4 days post surgery
Major complications (% score >=3) are considered by Clavien-Dindo Classification 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication
Over the 4 days post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimated Blood Loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Volume
Intraoperative
Overall duration of the surgery
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Minutes
Intraoperative
Anesthesia, Lymphadenectomy, Prostatectomy
Time Frame: Entrance of patient into operating room until completion of surgery
Minutes
Entrance of patient into operating room until completion of surgery
Number and type of intraoperative complications
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Note
Intraoperative
Postoperative hospitalization
Time Frame: From the surgery day up to 10 days postoperative
Days of recovery until the date of release
From the surgery day up to 10 days postoperative
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1-4 days postoperative
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 scale for the self-reported rate of pain: zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
1-4 days postoperative
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up
PSA test
1 month follow-up
Positive Surgical Margin
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks postoperative (during histological analysis)
Rate at histological examination
Up to 2 weeks postoperative (during histological analysis)
Lymph nodes resection
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Number of lymph nodes removed
Intraoperative
Urinary, sexual, and intestinal function assessment
Time Frame: Preoperative and follow-up (1, 3 and 6 months)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) questionnaire

Domains:

  • Urinary function (5 items)
  • Urinary bother (1 item)
  • Sexual function (8 items)
  • Sexual bother (1 item)
  • Bowel function (4 items)
  • Bowel bother (1 item)

Response options: 3- to 6-point Likert scales. The higher the score, the better the outcome

Preoperative and follow-up (1, 3 and 6 months)
Quality of Life Evaluation
Time Frame: Preoperative and follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) 36 questions (8 domains) for self-reported measure of health. Domain score from 0 to 100: the higher the score, the more favorable the state of health
Preoperative and follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months
Time taken for platform-related technical steps
Time Frame: From the room setting, through surgical procedure until postoperative room restoration for each of expected 150 surgeries (through study completion: an average of 1 year)
Set up of operating table, Electric connections, Draping, Undraping, Docking, Undocking, Cleaning: time in minutes
From the room setting, through surgical procedure until postoperative room restoration for each of expected 150 surgeries (through study completion: an average of 1 year)
Possible malfunction of the platform
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Note
Intraoperative
Procedure-related costs
Time Frame: From surgical procedure to the end of follow-up period (6 months)
Estimate
From surgical procedure to the end of follow-up period (6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro AA Antonelli, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe