Operator and Patient Acceptance of Radiofrequency Cautery of the Biopsy Track During Percutaneous Liver, Kidney or Spleen Biopsy Procedures.

October 31, 2025 updated by: Paul Bernard Shyn, Brigham and Women's Hospital
The goal of this study is to assess the physician and patient experience of radio frequency (RF) track cautery in patients undergoing needle biopsy of the liver, kidney, or spleen who have one or more risk factors for biopsy-related bleeding. RF track cautery involves inserting a bipolar electrode through the same introducer needle used for the biopsy, and heating the tissues along the path of the biopsy needle to prevent bleeding. This study primarily aims to assess the operator and patient experience during the use of track cautery. Secondary aims are to assess the technical success rate and procedure adverse events. Participants who enroll in the study will undergo track cautery as part of their clinically indicated liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy. After the procedure, they will fill out a brief survey asking about their experience during the procedure. Physician operators who perform track cautery as part of the study will also fill out a survey after each procedure asking about their experience using this technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Percutaneous biopsies of abdominal organs (liver, kidney, spleen) are commonly performed procedures and, while generally considered safe, have a small risk of post-biopsy hemorrhage. Bleeding risks of percutaneous biopsy are known to be higher for solid abdominal organs including liver, kidney and spleen, than for abdominal biopsies not involving these organs (for example, peritoneal masses or lymph nodes) Some patients also exhibit an increase in bleeding risk due to alterations in coagulation parameters or platelet number and function, which are known to increase rates of post-biopsy hemorrhage. Existing corrective measures for bleeding diathesis such as blood product transfusions are costly and confer additional risks, and do not address the mechanical tissue and vessel injury that sometimes underlies post-biopsy bleeding. Injection of gelatin sponge or other materials into the biopsy track via the introducer needle, while commonly used, can be cumbersome and imprecise, and has not yet clearly demonstrated a benefit in reducing post-biopsy bleeding in human studies.

High-frequency RF cautery, a technique ubiquitous in modern surgical practice, is routinely used for intraoperative hemostasis. This technique is also routinely used during image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation procedures, where the needle track created by the ablation probe is cauterized during probe retraction. An FDA-cleared bipolar RF cautery device that fits through a 17G biopsy introducer needle is now in clinical use, for the purpose of minimizing bleeding during percutaneous image-guided procedures. This study aims to prospectively study the physician and patient experience of using RF track cautery in patients undergoing percutaneous liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy procedures.

Primary aims of the study are:

  • Determine how the use of radiofrequency (RF) track cautery during percutaneous solid organ biopsy affects operator experience.
  • Determine how the use of radiofrequency (RF) track cautery during percutaneous solid organ biopsy affects patient experience.

Secondary aims of the study are:

  • Determine the technical success rate of RF track cautery during percutaneous solid organ biopsy, defined by successful deployment of the cautery electrode through the biopsy introducer needle and application of radiofrequency current to the biopsy track.
  • Monitor adverse events, such as bleeding, during and after biopsy procedures in which RF track cautery is used.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients referred to interventional radiology for clinically indicated liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy for diffuse or focal disease, who also have one or more of the following risk factors for bleeding:

  • Coagulopathy (INR ≥ 1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50) before correction
  • Renal disease with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 ml/min
  • Liver cirrhosis
  • Anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications where periprocedural withholding poses
  • Competing medical risk, or the urgency of the procedure precludes holding the anticoagulant medications for the standard interval (departmental guidelines).
  • Any splenic biopsy
  • Hypervascular masses in the liver or kidney
  • Renal and liver parenchymal biopsies, which are known to carry a higher risk of bleeding.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR remaining ≥ 2.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets remaining < 25)
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who are not competent to provide their own consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RF biopsy track cautery
This study is designed as an open-label, single arm study, wherein all study participants will undergo RF track cautery during percutaneous liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy.
After biopsy samples are obtained, the physician operator will place a radiofrequency bipolar cautery electrode through the biopsy introducer needle into the biopsy track and cauterize the track using a standardized protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient experience during use of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy
Time Frame: Within 6 hours after procedure
Patient experience will be assessed via a questionnaire completed while in the recovery area following their procedure. The patient questionnaire will include questions regarding patient recollection of discomfort related to RF cautery, and whether or not they would be willing to have RF cautery performed again during a future biopsy session, if indicated.
Within 6 hours after procedure
Operator experience during use of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy
Time Frame: Within 7 days after procedure
Operator experience will be assessed via a post-procedure questionnaire (included below) administered to all study operators immediately after they perform each biopsy procedure with RF cautery. The operator questionnaire will consist of a series of questions related to the use of RF cautery, focusing on factors such as ease of use, added procedure time, perceived benefits/detriments, and the operator's perception of associated patient discomfort.
Within 7 days after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success rate of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy
Time Frame: Within 7 days after procedure
Technical success will be defined by successful deployment of the cautery electrode through the introducer needle into the region sampled by the biopsy needle and application of radiofrequency current for the requisite duration. This will be assessed based on a combination of self-reported technical success by the operator as well as retrospective review of the intraprocedural images by the study investigators.
Within 7 days after procedure
Adverse events of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy
Time Frame: Within 30 days after procedure
Adverse events will be assessed by recording any major and minor adverse events (including bleeding) that occur during or after biopsy procedures where RF cautery was used.
Within 30 days after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul B Shyn, M.D., Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Subscribe