Retrospective Chart Review and Historical Comparison of Capmatinib vs. Standard of Care for German Adult Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Harboring METex14 Mutations (RECAP)

March 22, 2023 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Retrospective Chart Review and Historical Comparison of Capmatinib vs. Standard of Care for German Adult Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Harboring METex14 Mutations

The objective of the study was to compare the therapeutic benefit of capmatinib versus appropriate comparative therapy (ACT) defined by the German HTA agency G-BA for its benefit assessment of capmatinib but also versus the standard of care (SoC) practiced in German routine care. Due to its design as an adjusted, patient-level comparison, the RECAP study addresses the evidence gap due to the single-arm nature of pivotal evidence for capmatinib.

For this purpose, data on patients treated with ACT resp. SoC in German routine care has been collected via a retrospective chart review. This data was then used as an external control for a non-randomized, patient-level adjusted comparison with data from the GEOMETRY mono-1 study of capmatinib (NCT02414139).

Due to the non-interventional nature of this study, the definition of endpoints as primary or secondary was omitted formally.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

260

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Erlangen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Essen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gießen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Köln, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • München, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • NSCLC (any histology)

    • METex14 mutation
    • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) wildtype
    • Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement negative
  • Stage IV or Stage IIIB without indication for local therapy
  • First or second line of treatment
  • Age ≥18 years Exclusion criteria
  • Prior treatment with crizotinib, capmatinib, tepotinib or other MET inhibitors
  • Carcinomatous meningitis
  • Symptomatic brain metastases
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Status (ECOG) >1
  • Uncontrolled, clinically significant heart diseases
  • Malignant disease other than NSCLC within the past 3 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Capmatinib Patients
Patients who received first- or second-line treatment with capmatinib in Study GEOMETRY mono-1
Standard of Care Patients
Patients who received appropriate comparative therapy (ACT) defined by the German HTA agency G-BA or standard of care (SoC) practiced in German routine care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to an average of approximately 18 months
OS was defined as time from start of treatment to death due to any cause. Per the protocol and due to the non-interventional nature of this study, outcome measures were not formally ranked as primary or secondary.
Up to an average of approximately 18 months
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to an average of approximately 18 months
PFS was defined as time from start of treatment to first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. Per the protocol and due to the non-interventional nature of this study, outcome measures were not formally ranked as primary or secondary.
Up to an average of approximately 18 months
Time to central nervous system (CNS) progression (CNSprog)
Time Frame: Up to an average of approximately 18 months
For patients without brain metastases at start of treatment, CNSprog was defined as time from start of treatment to first radiologically documented brain metastases. Per the protocol and due to the non-interventional nature of this study, outcome measures were not formally ranked as primary or secondary.
Up to an average of approximately 18 months
Overall response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Up to an average of approximately 18 months

For external control patients, ORR was defined as proportion of patients with a radiologically documented decrease in sum of tumor lesions (primary tumor and metastases). Decrease in sum of tumor lesions included complete cessation of any radiologically detectable tumor lesions.

For GEOMETRY mono-1 patients, ORR was defined as proportion of patients with a best overall response as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR and PR were assessed per RECIST 1.1 by BIRC. Per the protocol and due to the non-interventional nature of this study, outcome measures were not formally ranked as primary or secondary.

Up to an average of approximately 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring METex14 Mutations

Subscribe