- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05909189
LEADing Dementia End-of-Life Planning Conversations (LEAD)
July 8, 2026 updated by: Kara Dassel, University of Utah
Advance care planning is important for all adults, but perhaps even more so for the 5.7 million persons with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD), due to the progressive and protracted cognitive deterioration associated with the disease process.
In the context of ADRD, medical decision-making at the end of life is typically left to one's care partner, who often does not have the knowledge or confidence in their ability to make such decisions.
This study will refine and evaluate a web-based platform, called the LEAD Intervention (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and other Dementias), which is designed to help persons in the preclinical or early stage of ADRD engage in conversations about, document, and share their end-of-life values and preferences with a care partner, extended family members, and health care providers.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Advance care planning is the process that allows individuals to express their future healthcare values and preferences so that these wishes can be enacted in the event that they become incapacitated and unable to participate in their own healthcare decisions.
In the case of Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD), the person with dementia (care recipient), almost inevitably loses decisional capacity toward the end of life, given the progressive decline in cognitive functioning that accompanies the disease over time.
The care partners to persons with dementia, most often family members such as spouse/partners and adult children, are therefore tasked with making end-of-life decisions on behalf of the care recipient with ADRD.
These care partners are not always well-informed of the care recipient's end-of-life values and preferences and therefore may not feel confident in their ability to make decisions regarding care and treatment at the end-of-life, resulting in unnecessary, futile, and often unwanted medical treatments and interventions.
Oftentimes, families do not want to engage in these challenging conversations and wait too long, whereby the care recipient with ADRD no longer has the decisional ability to participate in the advance care planning process.
We developed "The LEAD Guide" (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and other Dementias), as a tool to help persons with preclinical awareness of ADRD risk and those with early-stage cognitive impairment to begin these important conversations with a care partner.
In this NIH Stage-1 behavioral intervention study we will refine the LEAD Intervention based on our pilot work (Stage 1A) and then evaluate the usability, acceptability, feasibility, and initial efficacy of the LEAD Intervention (Stage 1B).
We will recruit a diverse sample of 60 community-dwelling ADRD pairs, defined as a care recipient in the preclinical or early stage of ADRD, plus their current or anticipated care partner (i.e., spouse/partner or adult child).
Results are expected to show that the LEAD Intervention can improve outcomes related to decision-making self-efficacy through greater advance care planning congruence and improve subjective well-being, anxiety, and relationship quality as perceived and reported by both the care recipient and the care partner.
Results from this study have the potential to guide and accelerate the implementation of the LEAD Intervention in community and healthcare practice, where a dementia-focused advance care process is needed.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
120
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
- University of Utah College of Nursing
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Care Recipient (CR) is age 50+
- CR Is interested in having conversations about and documenting wishes for future end-of-life care
- CR has noticed changes in memory or thinking skills indicative of preclinical or early stage of AD, OR
- CR has been diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, or another type of dementia and in the preclinical or early stage
- Care Partner (CP) is age 18+
- CP is a Spouse/partner, family member, or close friend of CR
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has moderate to severe symptoms of dementia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ADRD dyads
This is a single-arm study enrolling 60 ADRD community-based dyads.
|
The LEAD Intervention is self-administered and delivered through an interactive, web-based platform designed according to recommended functionalities and user-designed principles.
Through three distinct modules, the LEAD Intervention will facilitate the advance care planning processes of 1) defining care recipients' values and preferences for care, 2) developing advance care planning congruence within the pair, or a shared understanding of the care recipient's values and preferences, through conversation(s), and 3) encouraging ongoing advance care planning conversation and documentation that can be shared beyond the pair.
All modules will include video tutorials to introduce the goals and tasks as well as provide interactive resources to provide support and education relevant to the content of each module.
The three modules are intended to be followed in a sequential pattern.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision-Making Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Week 20
|
Decision-making efficacy as measured by both the care recipient and care partner as measured by the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
|
Week 20
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relationship Quality
Time Frame: Week 20
|
Relationship quality as measured by both the care recipient and care partner as measured by the Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS)
|
Week 20
|
|
Anxiety
Time Frame: Week 20
|
Perceived symptoms of anxiety by both the care recipient and care partner as measured by the PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety-Short Form 8a
|
Week 20
|
|
Subjective well-being
Time Frame: Week 20
|
Perceived subjective well being of care recipient and care partner as measured by the PROMIS General Life Satisfaction- Short Form 5a
|
Week 20
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kara Dassel, PhD, University of Utah
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Dassel KB, Utz R, Supiano K, McGee N, Latimer S. The Influence of Hypothetical Death Scenarios on Multidimensional End-of-Life Care Preferences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):52-59. doi: 10.1177/1049909116680990. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
- Supiano KP, McGee N, Dassel KB, Utz R. A Comparison of the Influence of Anticipated Death Trajectory and Personal Values on End-of-Life Care Preferences: A Qualitative Analysis. Clin Gerontol. 2019 May-Jun;42(3):247-258. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1365796. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
- Dassel K, Utz R, Supiano K, Bybee S, Iacob E. Development of a Dementia-Focused End-of-Life Planning Tool: The LEAD Guide (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Dementia). Innov Aging. 2019 Aug 2;3(3):igz024. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz024. eCollection 2019 Jul.
- Clayton JL, Utz RL, Aruscavage N, Bybee SG, Bigger SE, Iacob E, Dassel KB. Using community engagement with FRAME: Framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Nov 26;42:101398. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101398. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 4, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 9, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
June 18, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 10, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 8, 2026
Last Verified
July 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GRANT13319762
- 5R01AG069033-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
We welcome analysis and use by other investigators once our primary aims have been analyzed and disseminated.
All data and resources will be shared following the policies of the University of Utah and NIH.
We will share LEAD intervention survey data by depositing these data at National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), which is an NIH-funded repository.
These data will be shared with investigators working under an institution with a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA) and could be used for secondary study purposes such as examining components of self-efficacy.
Data will be shared in an Excel file format that will allow for easy access to qualified users.
Shared data will include participant demographic information and survey data relevant to all predictor and primary study outcome variables.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data will become available upon completion of the study and once findings have been published by the study team.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
We will share LEAD intervention survey data by depositing these data at National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), which is an NIH-funded repository.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.