- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05929391
Effectiveness of Methods to Remove Residual Orthodontic Adhevsie
The Effectiveness of Methods for Removing Residual Orthodontic Adhesive From Debonded Metal Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- To evaluate and compare the bond failure rates of rebonded brackets using two methods to remove the adhesive remnant and comparing them with contralateral teeth.
- To evaluate and compare the bond failure rates of rebonded brackets between different quadrants and arches.
- To evaluate and compare the bond failure rates of rebonded molar tubes using two methods to remove the adhesive remnant and comparing them with contralateral teeth.
- To evaluate and compare the bond failure rates of rebonded molar tubes between different quadrants and arches.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Baghdad., Iraq
- 2 private dental clinics in Iraq and special center in Karbala.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients need metal fixed orthodontic appliance treatment;
- Complete set of permanent dentition with fully erupted teeth on both arches;
- Intact teeth and mainly their buccal surfaces are free from caries, fillings, or gingival hyperplasia;
- No occlusal interferences that can affect the ideal position of attachments, especially in the lower arch.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients have crown, missing teeth, or craniofacial anomalies.
- patients have congenital enamel defects specially their buccal surface.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: sandblasted group (T1)
the side of mouth patient that receives fixed orthodontic appliance that renewed by sandblast
|
T0: The adhesive removal will be performed by high-speed hand piece with tungsten carbide bur. the bur will be changed every five attachments. T1: Control group of T0. T2: The adhesive removal will be performed by sandblasting via Micro-etcher. T3: Control group of T2. |
|
Placebo Comparator: control group (T3)
the side of mouth patient that receives new fixed orthodontic appliance.
|
T0: The adhesive removal will be performed by high-speed hand piece with tungsten carbide bur. the bur will be changed every five attachments. T1: Control group of T0. T2: The adhesive removal will be performed by sandblasting via Micro-etcher. T3: Control group of T2. |
|
Experimental: tungsten bur group (T0)
the side of mouth patient that receives fixed orthodontic appliance that renewed by tungsten bur.
|
T0: The adhesive removal will be performed by high-speed hand piece with tungsten carbide bur. the bur will be changed every five attachments. T1: Control group of T0. T2: The adhesive removal will be performed by sandblasting via Micro-etcher. T3: Control group of T2. |
|
Placebo Comparator: control group (T2)
the side of mouth patient that receives new fixed orthodontic appliance.
|
T0: The adhesive removal will be performed by high-speed hand piece with tungsten carbide bur. the bur will be changed every five attachments. T1: Control group of T0. T2: The adhesive removal will be performed by sandblasting via Micro-etcher. T3: Control group of T2. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The number of bonding failures will be compared using the chi-square test.
Time Frame: baselines
|
evaluate and compare the bond failure rates.
different quadrants and arches.To evaluate and compare the bond failure rates of rebonded attachments(brackets and molar tubes)using two methods (Tungsten carbide bur and sandblasting)) to remove the adhesive remnant and comparing them with contralateral teeth.
|
baselines
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The bonding failure between each quadrant will be compared by one way ANOVA.
Time Frame: bsaelines
|
evaluate and compare the bond failure rates.
different quadrants and arches.
|
bsaelines
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ahmed T, Rahman NA, Alam MK. Assessment of in vivo bond strength studies of the orthodontic bracket-adhesive system: A systematic review. Eur J Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):602-609. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_22_18.
- Alessandri Bonetti G, Zanarini M, Incerti Parenti S, Lattuca M, Marchionni S, Gatto MR. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.027.
- Eminkahyagil N, Arman A, Cetinsahin A, Karabulut E. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):314-21. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0314:EORMOE]2.0.CO;2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- recycling orthodontic
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Appliance Complication
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication | Orthodontic Appliance Design | Orthodontic TreatmentSaudi Arabia
-
Al-Azhar UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
China Medical University HospitalCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationTaiwan
-
mohamed abdelmotalebCairo UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Appliance Complication
-
Ammar AlubaydiCompleted
-
Rehman Medical Institute - RMICompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationPakistan
-
University of PaviaCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationItaly
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationSyrian Arab Republic
Clinical Trials on Recycling orthodontic brackets
-
CES UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Appliance Complication
-
University of AarhusActive, not recruitingOrthodontic Appliances, Fixed
-
University of BaghdadRecruitingTreating Class II Malocclusion and Bimaxillary ProclinationIraq
-
The University of The West IndiesUniversity of DundeeUnknownBimaxillary ProclinationTrinidad and Tobago
-
University of PaviaCompletedDental Malocclusion | Periodontal InflammationItaly
-
Al-Azhar UniversityUnknownPlaque Accumulation | Pocket Depth | Gigival BleedingEgypt
-
University of PaviaCompletedDental MalocclusionItaly
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Barts & The London NHS TrustEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust; Southend NHS Foundation...Completed