Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight vs. Looped Fixed Retainers

November 30, 2022 updated by: Talal Zahid, King Abdulaziz University

Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight Versus Looped Fixed Retainers: a Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this split-mouth, head-to-head, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of a fixed straight retainer with the V- loop bonded retainer on periodontal health in patients with the requirement of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment.

The main question it aims to answer is whether the V- loop bonded retainer is more effective than fixed straight retainer for periodontal health management.

Each patient will receive 2 lower fixed and bonded retainers: (1) a straight wire retainer (SWR) and (2) a looped wire retainer (LWR). Patients will be asked to floss once daily with a thread flosser.

Researchers will compare the effects of two types of retainers to see if there is a statistically significant difference.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ensuring alignment stability is a major challenge for orthodontists following an orthodontic treatment. This has led to the development of various orthodontic retention methods to enhance stability. Both fixed and removable retainers have been in use for years. However, most orthodontists nowadays prefer fixed bonded retainers over removable ones due to their many advantages, including easy to wear, being patient compliance free, long-term usability and stability, and better aesthetics. Over the past decades, many variations of fixed retainers have been developed. Of these, the current gold standard is the straight type flexible spiral (multistranded) wire retainer. Nevertheless, a major concern of using fixed straight retainers is the potential for periodontal health compromise. They are known to make oral hygiene maintenance more difficult for the patient, which in turn may lead to periodontal diseases due to more plaque and calculus accumulation. The wave or V- loop bonded retainer may be a solution to this problem, as it provides stability of teeth yet allows flossing with ease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 80209
        • Recruiting
        • King Abdulaziz University, Department of Periodontics
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in need of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment
  • Good periodontal health (i.e., no clinical attachment loss and < 10% bleeding on probing)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of oral prophylaxis in the past 6 months
  • History of any systemic illness such as diabetes
  • Preexisting or post-orthodontic periodontal disease
  • Current intake of antibiotic and/or anti-inflammatory medications
  • Smoking
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: V-looped Wire Retainer (LWR)
The LWR is a 0.569-mm (0.022-inch) Blue Elgiloy (soft) round wire (RMO). The retainer will extend from the left canine to the right central incisor.
The V- loop bonded retainer is a unique design that not just provides tooth stability but also allows flossing with ease.
Other Names:
  • V-loop Bonded Lingual Retainer
  • Wave Orthodontic Retainer
Active Comparator: Straight Wire Retainer (SWR)
The SWR is 0.8-mm twisted stainless steel wire (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). The retainer will extend from the right canine to the left central incisor.
The straight wire retainer is a fixed bonded orthodontic retainer. This involves attaching a metal wire to the back of the teeth to keep it in position.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of retainer failures and teeth stability through clinical examination
Time Frame: Approximately 2 years
The examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome of bonds of assigned intervention immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years.
Approximately 2 years
Measurement of the Little's Irregularity Index to assess the crowding of Mandibular anterior arch
Time Frame: Approximately 2 years

The examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome assigned interventions immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years.

The scale of the index includes the following:

  • 0: Perfect Alignment
  • 1-3: Minimal Irregularity
  • 4-6: Moderate Irregularity
  • 7-9: Severe Irregularity
  • 10: Very Severe Irregularity

The value represents the total horizontal displacement of the anatomical contact points of the mandibular anterior teeth in millimeters.

Approximately 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingivitis on the 4-point Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time Frame: Approximately 2 years
The MGI is a non-invasive visual instrument designed to evaluate the progression of gingivitis. The scale ranges from 0 (normal gingiva) to 3. (severe inflammation with tendency to spontaneous bleeding). Change = (Year 2 Score - Baseline Score)
Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in plaque accumulation on O'leary Plaque Index (PI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time Frame: Approximately 2 years
The PI is a valid and reliable assessment tool that records the presence of mineralized deposits and soft debris on all 4 surfaces of every tooth. It utilizes a rating scale from 0 (no plaque) to 1 (plaque present at gingival margin). Change = (Year 2 Score - Baseline Score)
Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingival bleeding on the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) by Ainamo and Bay at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time Frame: Approximately 2 years
The GBI is a reliable measure of periodontal stability. It uses delicate probing of the gingival sulcus orifice. Using a standardized periodontal probe with a 0.6 mm tip and 1 mm marking, the bleeding on probing (BOP) will be evaluated. A skilled examiner will measure BOP using probes with 0.25 N or less of force (25 g). If bleeding starts within 10 seconds, a positive finding is recorded.
Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in oral hygiene questionnaire at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time Frame: Approximately 2 years
Participants will be adminstered a self-reported oral hygiene questionnaire on brushing and flossing frequency, patient satisfaction with the retainers, and ease of flossing to determine their overall satisfaction with the interventions.
Approximately 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Talal Zahid, M.S, Associate Professor, King Abdulaziz University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Clinical Trials on V- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer

3
Subscribe