Comparison of Efficacy Between Conservative Versus Operative Management of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome

September 24, 2023 updated by: Muhammad Adnan Afsar, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad
Patients presented with symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night diagnosed by consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination. Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred while patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). Patients were assessed during a follow up visit at 3rd month measured using functional status scale of the Boston questionnaire (BQ). Efficacy was determined in terms of functional improvement from the baseline.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CMH Abbottabad, from 3 March 2022 to 3 September 2022. Ethical approval (file no: CMH-ADT-73-Ortho-23) was sought from the Ethical Committee.

The sample size was calculated by WHO Sample Size calculator with 90% 10 efficacy of surgical treatment and 59.1% 11 efficacy of conservative treatment, with 80% power of test and 5% significance level. Nonprobability consecutive sampling technique was used to gather the sample for this trial.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients of either gender, aged between 18 to 60 years presented with symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night diagnosed for Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria: Patients already under treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were excluded.

Written informed consent was also taken from all the study participants after a complete description. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was diagnosed by consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination having symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night. To ensure randomization, the lottery method was used to allocate the patients to study groups. Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred while patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). Patients were assessed during a follow up visit at 3rd month measured using functional status scale of the Boston questionnaire (BQ). The Functional Status Scale (FSS) from the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire is an 8-item questionnaire originally developed by Levine et al. [10] to assess functional abilities in patients with CTS. Each item of the FSS is rated on a scale from "1" "no difficulty" to "5" "unable." The overall score for the FSS was calculated as the mean of the completed items, and ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicated greater disability. Efficacy was determined in terms of functional improvement from the baseline. An improvement of '2' points from the baseline was termed efficacious.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Khyber Pukhtunkhwa
      • Abbottabad, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan, 22020
        • Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients of either gender, aged between 18 to 60 years presented with symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night diagnosed for Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by a consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients already under treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patients
Patients presented with symptoms of numbness at night, pain, or tingling sensation in the fingers particularly at night diagnosed by a consultant orthopedic surgeon on physical examination.
Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred
Other Names:
  • Splinting
Patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Other Names:
  • open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Other: Principle Investigator
The principal investigator will carry out the whole study.
Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred
Other Names:
  • Splinting
Patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Other Names:
  • open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Other: Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon
Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon will be outcome assessor.
Patients in Group A were treated conservatively i.e Splinting in neutral position of wrist for 6 wks min at night and during the day as preferred
Other Names:
  • Splinting
Patients in Group B were managed through surgical intervention i.e open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)
Other Names:
  • open carpal tunnel release (OCTR)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy in terms of Functional Status Scale Score (FSS Score)
Time Frame: 3 months
Efficacy was determined in terms of functional improvement from the baseline as per Functional Status Scale Score
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Ad Afsar, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 3, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

I am not going to share it with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Conservative Approach

Subscribe