- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01751633
Spine FA3 - a Prospective, International, Multicenter Cohort Study on Treatment of of AO A3 Thoracolumbar Fractures (FA3)
August 11, 2020 updated by: AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
Comparison of Surgical Versus Conservative Treatment of AO Type A3 Thoracolumbar Fractures Without Neurological Deficits Prospective, International, Multicenter Cohort Study
Thoracolumbar fractures are the most common spinal fractures with an average annual incidence between 18 and 30 per 100'000 inhabitants.
The majority of these fractures are AO type A3 ("burst fractures").
Although patients with burst fractures report a reduced quality of life and chronic pain, there is no clear evidence whether surgical or conservative treatment offer better functional and back-pain related outcomes.
The indications for the selection of an ideal treatment for these fractures without neurological deficits remain controversial.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether patients with thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit being surgically treated show faster recovery and better improvement of function than patients being conservatively treated.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
38
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Curitiba, Brazil
- Hospital Universitaria Cajuru
-
Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Hospital Cristo Redentor
-
São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Santa Marcelina
-
-
-
-
-
Santiago de Chile, Chile
- Hospital Cristo Redentor
-
-
-
-
-
Liberec, Czechia
- Krajska Nemocnice Liberec
-
-
-
-
-
Munich, Germany
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
-
-
-
-
-
Catania, Italy
- Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico
-
-
-
-
-
Almada, Portugal
- Hospital Garcia e Orta, EPE
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
140 subjects patients with thoracolumbar fractures will be assigned to ei-ther conservative or surgical treatment depending on the surgeon's decision.
Patients will be treated at each institution per standard of care.
Surgeons will use their expertise and preferences to determine the method of surgical or conservative intervention.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-65 years
Diagnosis of single or multiple stable thoracolumbar fracture(s)
- Level T10- L3
- Type AO A3 or A4
- Radiologically confirmed by Rx or CT
- Fracture induced kyphotic deformity lower or equal to 20-35 degrees
- Definitive treatment (surgical or conservative) within 10 days after injury
- American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale = E (normal )
- Ability to understand patient information / informed consent form
- Willingness and ability to participate in the clinical investigation including imaging and follow-up procedures (FUs)
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Open fracture
- Polytrauma
- Pathologic fracture
- Disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex between T10 and L3
- Clinically evident osteoporosis as assessed by the investigator
- Spinal luxation
- Associated severe lesions as assessed by the investigator
- Spinal lesion due to gun or projectile
- Pre-existing spinal column deformity
- Prior spinal surgeries
- BMI > 40 kg/m2
- Any severe medically not managed systemic disease
- Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reli-able assessment
- Pregnancy or women planning to conceive within the study period
- Prisoner
- Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Surgical treatment
Surgical treatment according to one of the following:
|
Other Names:
|
Conservative treatment
Conservative treatment according to hospital's standard of care
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Time Frame: 6 week follow up
|
Improvement in functional outcome from baseline to 6 week follow up (FU) measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
|
6 week follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Back pain related disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire RMDQ)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS))
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months FU
|
Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months FU
|
Radiologic progress taking into account RX, CT and optionally MRI
Time Frame: baseline and at follow up after 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
baseline and at follow up after 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
|
Quality of return to work (Denis Work Scale)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Time to return to work
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Conservative treatment failure rate (eg, change to surgical treatment)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Rates of local adverse events (AE)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Giuseppe Barbagallo, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico, Catania, Italy
- Principal Investigator: Emiliano Vialle, MD, Catholic University of Parana - Curitiba, Brazil
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 14, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
December 18, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 13, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 11, 2020
Last Verified
August 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Spine FA3
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Single Level Stable Thoracolumbar Fracture Type AO A3
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandStryker SA; Polyclinique du Parc RambotCompleted
Clinical Trials on Surgical
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationAOCMFCompletedBilateral Condylar Fracture of the MandibleUnited States, Taiwan, Switzerland, South Africa, Finland, Slovenia, Pakistan, Spain, Germany, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Ukraine, Uruguay
-
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for ChildrenRecruiting
-
HealthCore-NERIUniversity of California, San Diego; University of Maryland; University of Alabama... and other collaboratorsTerminated
-
University of BergenOslo University Hospital; Haukeland University Hospital; Skane University Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of CologneCompletedOutcome, Fatal | Vertebral Osteomyelitis | Spondylodiscitis
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruitingOsteoarthritis, Knee | Anterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureChina
-
Zimmer BiometRecruitingRib; FractureAustralia, Korea, Republic of
-
Kolding SygehusOdense University Hospital; Karolinska University Hospital; Zealand University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingFracture Humerus of ShaftSweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway
-
The Cleveland ClinicActive, not recruitingEducational ProblemsUnited States
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenActive, not recruitingRupture | Ultrasonography | Acute Disease | Athletic Injuries | Achilles Tendon RuptureSweden