Neuro-navigated TMS for Chronic SCI Patients

October 3, 2023 updated by: King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Can neuro-navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation be used as an additional outcome measure to EM-SCI assessments in a Spinal cord injury trial?

  • Compare EM-SCI assessment with nTMS in ten chronic thoracic SCI patients
  • Compare EM-SCI assessment with nTMS in ten chronic cervical SCI patients

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an exciting time for translating experimental Advanced Therapies into treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI). There are currently no regenerative therapies available that target the underlying biology. Over the last 5 years the investigating team have developed a viable gene therapy approach for treating SCI in pre-clinical models. The investigators are on the cusp of translating this therapy to first-in-human studies and are leading a programme to establish a world-first regenerative gene therapy for traumatic SCI affecting upper limb mobility (since recovery of arm/hand function is one of the highest patient priorities). The team will develop an innovative trial design involving neurosurgical delivery of the gene therapy into the spinal cord, followed by specialist neurorehabilitation.

For a clinical trial to have the best chance of success, one of the key steps needed to be addressed include validation of new assessment methods for the clinical trial. Our aim is to determine whether neuro-navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS) can be used as an adjunct to standard assessments of function in SCI patients. Following two patient and public involvement events (patient focus group and feedback for project design with our rehabilitation partners), the investigating team will recruit chronic SCI subjects to carry out European Multicenter Study about SCI (EM-SCI) assessments. EM-SCI assessments are well established assessment tools for SCI patients and include the EM-SCI 'core' assessments (ISNCSCI, WISCI-III, Walk Test, SCIM 3) and EM-SCI 'additional' assessments (GRASSP, Pain score, neurophysiology). Following this investigators will compare and validate nTMS with EM-SCI assessments in stable chronic SCI patients with both cervical and thoracic injuries. nTMS with combined Tractography MRI of the cortico-spinal tract (the main motor pathway of the spinal cord) will allow functional characterisation and density measurements of this tract in SCI patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • Recruiting
        • King's College Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Aminul Ahmed, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Azharul Khan, BSc, PgDip

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

20 patients, 10 Cervical SCI and 10 Thoracic SCI who meet eligibility criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single traumatic event at least 6 months prior to recruitment
  • ISNCSCI grade A, B, C or D
  • Able to participate in EM-SCI and nTMS assessments and capable of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Malignancy
  • History of other Neurological disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Other cord lesions or tethering
  • Cord transaction or penetrating injury

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Chronic spinal cord injuries
Defined as spinal cord injuries secondary to a single traumatic event to the Cervical or thoracic spine, more than 6 months ago.
No intervention is planned as part of this study, this is a feasibility/pilot study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting Motor Threshold (rMT)
Time Frame: 1 year
Resting motor threshold (rMT) is the amount of machine output responsible for a positive motor evoked potential in at least % of the trials. This outcome is expressed in % and it is directly obtained from the TMS software.
1 year
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Latency
Time Frame: 1 year
MEP latency is a TMS measure of time taken for intracortical processing, spinal processing and neurmuscular transmission. It is measure in miliseconds (mS). Linear regression analysis will be used to compare TMS measurements against EM-SCI measurements to validate TMS as an assessment tool for chronic SCI.
1 year
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude
Time Frame: 1 year
Motor evoked potential (MEP) Amplitude is a TMS measurement of the number of motoneurons recruited during TMS stimulation. It is expressed in milivolt (mV). Linear regression analysis will be used to compare TMS measurements against EM-SCI measurements to validate TMS as an assessment tool for chronic SCI.
1 year
Spinal cord independence measure III (SCIM III)
Time Frame: 1 year
SCIM is a validated reproducible measure used in EM-SCI, as a measure of spinal cord injury functionality. This is a questionnaire with a score from 0-100.
1 year
Graded redefined assessment of strength, sensation and prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: 1 year
GRASSP is a validated clinical impairment score to measure impairment in the upper limbs. This is a tool currently used within the EM-SCI protocol.
1 year
Diffusion Tension Imaging Metrics of Corticospinal Tract Tractography
Time Frame: 1 year
We will calculate the fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, axial diffusivity and mean diffusivity for bilateral cortical spinal tract. These metrics range from 0 to 1. We will use DSI Studio Software to proceed with these calculations.
1 year
Cortical Motor Area and Volume
Time Frame: 1 year
We will calculate the area and volume of cortical activation of both upper and lower limbs.The area is calculated in cm2 and the volume in microvolt per cm2. We will use TMSMap Software to produce these metrics.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aminul Ahmed, King's College London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on No Intervention

3
Subscribe