- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02943915
The WISE Trial - Walking Improvement for SCI With Exoskeleton (WISE)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Community dwelling iSCI participants may improve clinical gait function by engaging in a gait training regimen, where robotic exoskeletons can readily deliver a precise dose and simultaneously reduce the physical stress imposed on therapists using conventional manually assisted stepping practice. Exoskeleton training is predicted to improve function in participants receiving usual care, but not superior to intensity-matched manual training. The rationale to implement exoskeleton robotics as preference in gait training is based on precision dosing, over-ground training, and reduced therapist burden for high repetition training.
The investigators aim to demonstrate that Ekso exoskeleton training can significantly improve gait speed in stable chronic, community-dwelling incomplete SCI (iSCI) participants. The objectives of this study are the following:
A. Primary Objective:
To demonstrate that a 12 week robotic gait training regimen can lead to a clinically meaningful improvement in independent gait speed on the 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) in community dwelling participants with chronic iSCI.
B. Secondary Objectives:
- To examine the economic factors such as number of physical therapists/staff required during training.
- To analyze the physical burden on therapists assisting and supervising during training.
- To study the influence of factors that may modify the gait recovery in the chronic incomplete SCI population (demographic, clinical, functional, psychological, balance, etc.).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
- Barrow Neurological Institute at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
-
-
Connecticut
-
Wallingford, Connecticut, United States, 06492
- Gaylord Hospital
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
-
Wheaton, Illinois, United States, 60187
- Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21211
- Kennedy Kruger Institute
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
- Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
- Courage Kenny Research Center
-
-
New Jersey
-
West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
- Kessler Foundation
-
-
New York
-
White Plains, New York, United States, 10605
- Burke Medical Research Institute
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Motor incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia
- Neurological level of injury (NLI) C1- approximately T10 (inclusive, for upper motor neuron injuries only), as determined by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
- Sufficient diaphragmatic strength such that respiration is not compromised with exercise.
- Sufficient upper extremity strength to use a front wheeled walker either by manual muscle testing (minimum triceps strength bilaterally of 3/5, shoulder abduction/adduction and flexion/extension 4/5)
- AIS-C SCI & AIS-D SCI, as determined by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
- Ambulates at <0.44 meters/second with or without physical assistance and assistance device
- WISCI ≥ 1
- 18 - 75 yrs, inclusive
- No current or history of other neurological conditions
- Screened and cleared by a physician
- Involved in standing program or must be able to tolerate at least 15 min upright
- Weigh 220 pounds (100kg) or less
- Be able to fit into the Ekso device
- Approximately between 5'0" and 6'4" tall
- Standing hip width of approximately 18" or less
- Have near normal range of motion in hips, knees and ankles
Exclusion Criteria:
- AIS-A SCI or AIS-B SCI
- Lower motor neuron injuries, as shown by absent reflexes during bilateral quadriceps and Achilles tendon taps
- < 3 months since previous intensive gait training regimen
- Already walking at self-selected ambulation speeds of at least 0.44 meter/second with or without assistance
- Currently involved in another intervention study
- Concurrent neurological disease
- Hip flexion contracture greater than ~17°
- Knee flexion contracture greater than 12°
- Unable to achieve neutral ankle dorsiflexion with passive stretch (neutral with max 12° knee flexion)
Leg length discrepancy
- Greater than 0.5" for upper leg
- Greater than 0.75" for lower leg
- Spinal instability
- Unresolved deep vein thrombosis
- Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
- Severe muscular or skeletal pain
- Spasticity that prevents joint motion (severe stiffness or rigidity,) where both legs have a Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) score of 3 or higher for half or more of their proximal lower extremity muscles; proximal muscles include hip flexors/extensors/adductors and knee flexors/extensors.
- Open skin ulcerations on buttocks or other body surfaces in contact with exoskeleton or harness
- Pregnancy
- Cognitive impairments - unable to follow 2 steps commands and communicate for pain or to stop session
- Shoulder extension Range of Motion (ROM) < 50° excludes crutches during sit to stand or vice versa. (Walking with crutches permitted.)
- Participant requires the assistance of more than one therapist to transfer safely.
- Uncontrolled or severe orthostatic hypotension that limits standing tolerance; defined as sustained, symptomatic drops in systolic and diastolic blood pressure when moving from sitting to standing
- Active heterotrophic ossification (HO), hip dysplasia or hip/knee axis abnormalities
- Colostomy
- History of long bone fractures since the SCI, secondary to osteoporosis
- Unable to sustain current medication regimen
- Any reason the physician may deem as harmful to the participant to enroll or continue in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group 1: Ekso GT Rehabilitation Therapy
Participants in this group receive Ekso GT (gait training) PT therapy intervention 3 times per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions).
Intervention: Ekso GT Rehabilitation therapy
|
Walking Improvement for Spinal Cord Injuries with Exoskeleton
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Group 2: Active controls - BWSTT Therapy
Participants in this group receive a matched number of sessions of standard gait training using body-weight supported treadmill training and overground training.
Intervention: Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training
|
Standard gait training using BWS PT and overground training
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Group 3: Passive controls
Participants in this group continue with normal daily activities over 12 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Gait Speed From Baseline to 12 Weeks Using 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks
|
The mean change in gait speed demonstrated during the 10MWT after 12 weeks of training and compared between groups.
Positive values indicate improvement in gait speed (faster) from baseline to 12 weeks.
Negative values indicate a reduction in gait speed (slower) from baseline to 12 weeks.
|
Baseline and 12 Weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants Who Met the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of 0.15m/s in Gait Speed Per 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Between baseline and 24 weeks
|
Number of participants who achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 0.15 m/s during the 10MWT when comparing between baseline gait speed and gait speed at 24 weeks.
|
Between baseline and 24 weeks
|
Change in Distance Covered Over 6 Minutes From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline-24 weeks
|
6 minute walk test (6MWT) completed at baseline and 24 weeks.
Change assessed.
Positive values indicate an increase in distance was able to be walked at 24 weeks versus at baseline.
Negative values indicate a decrease in distance was walked at 24 weeks versus at baseline.
|
Baseline-24 weeks
|
Change in Time Required to Complete Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test From Baseline to 24 Week Follow up
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
|
Examined balance and walking in participants at baseline and follow up at 24 weeks.
Positive values indicate an improvement of time (less time) required to complete task at 24 week follow up versus at baseline.
Negative values indicate a decline, more time required to complete task at follow up versus baseline.
|
Baseline and 24 weeks
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Fall During Protocol
Time Frame: Throughout 24 weeks
|
At each training session, assessed if participant had experienced any falls.
Count is number of participants who reported that yes, they did experience a fall.
|
Throughout 24 weeks
|
Change in Berg Balance Scale Score From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline-24 weeks
|
Measurement of static and dynamic sitting and standing balance completed at baseline and at 24 weeks.
Berg balance scale is a 14 item test with each item scored from 0-4.
Possible scores range from 0-56.
Higher scores indicate a lower risk of falls and better balance.
Positive numbers indicate an improvement in Berg balance scale (scored out of 56), meaning that the participant scored higher at 24 weeks than at baseline.
Negative values indicate a decline in performance of the Berg balance scale (scored out of 56), meaning that the participant scored lower at 24 weeks than at baseline.
|
Baseline-24 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dylan Edwards, PhD, Burke Medical Research Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sale P, Russo EF, Russo M, Masiero S, Piccione F, Calabro RS, Filoni S. Effects on mobility training and de-adaptations in subjects with Spinal Cord Injury due to a Wearable Robot: a preliminary report. BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 28;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0536-0.
- Stampacchia G, Rustici A, Bigazzi S, Gerini A, Tombini T, Mazzoleni S. Walking with a powered robotic exoskeleton: Subjective experience, spasticity and pain in spinal cord injured persons. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 27;39(2):277-83. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161358.
- Gad PN, Gerasimenko YP, Zdunowski S, Sayenko D, Haakana P, Turner A, Lu D, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Iron 'ElectriRx' man: Overground stepping in an exoskeleton combined with noninvasive spinal cord stimulation after paralysis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:1124-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318563.
- Kozlowski AJ, Bryce TN, Dijkers MP. Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):110-21. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-110. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
- Kressler J, Thomas CK, Field-Fote EC, Sanchez J, Widerstrom-Noga E, Cilien DC, Gant K, Ginnety K, Gonzalez H, Martinez A, Anderson KD, Nash MS. Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Oct;95(10):1878-1887.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.026. Epub 2014 May 17.
- Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Crew J, Moran S, Shah A. Safety and feasibility of using the EksoTM bionic exoskeleton to aid ambulation after spinal cord injury. Spine. 2013 doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.S4-003
- Forrest GF, Hutchinson K, Lorenz DJ, Buehner JJ, Vanhiel LR, Sisto SA, Basso DM. Are the 10 meter and 6 minute walk tests redundant in patients with spinal cord injury? PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e94108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094108. eCollection 2014.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 105333
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Injuries, Spinal Cord
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
ReWalk Robotics, Inc.Unknown
-
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GACompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityInstitute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy of the Polish Academy of... and other collaboratorsUnknownComplete Spinal Cord InjuriesPoland
-
University of MiamiViewray Inc.Not yet recruitingSpinal Cord Compression | Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord CompressionUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingMetastatic Epidural Spinal Cord CompressionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Ekso GT Rehabilitation Therapy
-
Ekso BionicsTerminatedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
University of CalgaryCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesCanada
-
Vrije Universiteit BrusselCompleted
-
Vrije Universiteit BrusselTerminated
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Gait Disorders, NeurologicUnited States
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaIRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna (Italy); Department of... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Rehabilitation Hospital of Overland ParkDiscovery StatisticsRecruitingNeurologic DisorderUnited States
-
Baylor Research InstituteUnited States Department of Defense; Texas Woman's UniversityRecruitingSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Sunnyview Rehabilitation HospitalRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Acute | Cerebrovascular Accident | Cerebrovascular Accident, AcuteUnited States
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompleted