Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia

October 8, 2023 updated by: Zhijun Bao, Fudan University

Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: 10 Years of Experience From a Single Center in China

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is difficult to manage, with high rates of post-operative recurrence and complication. Keyhole and Sugarbaker are the most commonly used techniques in the surgical repair of the PSH. However, the efficacy and safety of the two surgical methods have not been adequately compared in the East Asian population.

Patients diagnosed with PSH who underwent Sugarbaker or Keyhole repair from August 2012 to August 2022 will be included. Patient demographic data and postoperative outcomes will be retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measure is the recurrence rate at one year follow-up time.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Consecutive patients undergoing surgical PSH repair in the Hernia Center of Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University from August 2012 to August 2022 were included in this study. Huadong Hospital undertakes surgical treatment of complex hernia and abdominal wall diseases in Shanghai, China. The surgical records and clinical data of patients will be retrospectively analyzed. Due to the retrospective design of the study, the patient's informed consent was waived. The study was conducted following the ethical standards set out in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

The patient's surgical strategy was made by the center's experienced colorectal surgeons or specialists in the department of hernia and abdominal wall surgery. In surgical practice, preference is given to the laparoscopic approach, while open surgery is chosen in cases of severe abdominal adhesions. The following three aspects of clinical data were recorded: (1) patients' demographic data, such as age, sex, the primary disease for the stoma, body mass index and comorbidities; (2) Surgical details: repair technique, size of abdominal wall defect, duration of the surgical procedure; (3) Short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes: the primary outcome is the recurrence rate at one year follow-up time, while the secondary outcomes were length and cost of the hospitalization, and rates of the intensive care unit admission, chronic pain, surgical site infection (SSI), re-admission and re-operation rates within 30 days after surgery, major complications after surgery, and surgery-related death.

Only PSH patients who received intraperitoneal onlay Sugarbaker and Keyhole mesh were included. These patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments at the outpatient clinics, specifically at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. If recurrence is suspected by the surgeon after a physical examination, the patient would be requested for an abdominal CT scan. During the CT scan, patients were asked to perform the Valsava maneuver to facilitate the identification of any potential recurrences through imaging. Postoperative major complications were defined as complications requiring hospitalization after surgery to the one-year follow-up time. Patients with follow-up periods of less than one year were excluded from the cohort. Recorded death, recurrence, or loss to follow-up were considered to be the endpoint.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with PSH who underwent Sugarbaker or Keyhole repair from August 2012 to August 2022 were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Only PSH patients who received intraperitoneal onlay Sugarbaker and Keyhole mesh were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with less than one year follow-up periods were excluded from the cohort.

Patients received other repair approaches.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Keyhole repair
The keyhole technique involves placing a mesh with a slit in the central hole around the intestinal ring, allowing facilitating the passage of the intestine through the central slit.
The keyhole technique involves placing a mesh with a slit in the central hole around the intestinal ring, allowing facilitating the passage of the intestine through the central slit.
Sugarbaker repair
The modified Sugarbaker technique uses a mesh to place a patch on the lateralized intestine, effectively preventing herniation of abdominal contents through the stoma.
The modified Sugarbaker technique uses a mesh to place a patch on the lateralized intestine, effectively preventing herniation of abdominal contents through the stoma.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence rate
Time Frame: one year follow-up time
recurrence was determined by CT scan
one year follow-up time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
surgical site infection
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
wound infection in the surgical site
30 days after surgery
reoperation and readmission
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
rates of the patients suffered from reoperation and readmission
30 days after surgery
chronic pain
Time Frame: one year follow-up time
rate of patients suffered from chronic pain in the surgical site
one year follow-up time
major complication
Time Frame: one year follow-up time
rate of patients suffered from severe complications (need hospitalization)
one year follow-up time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Huadong hernia

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe