Individual Neuromodulation for PDS

January 8, 2024 updated by: Ruijin Hospital

Personalized Neuromodulation Treatment for Parkinson's Syndrome

Parkinsonian Syndromes (PDS) with predominant motor dysfunction include progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Current treatment options for PDS are extremely limited due to the less understanding of disease pathophysiology and lack of therapeutic targets. Combining the results of previous studies and our group's previous research, sixty qualified PDS patients would be enrolled to conduct a prospective single-center randomized sham controlled clinical trial to verify the new therapeutic options that can improve symptoms and effectively slow the progression of the disease.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Compliance with the MDS revised clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinsonian syndrome (2015 edition)
  • aged >40 years and <80 years, regardless of gender.
  • Patients were relatively stable during the study period and remained stable on medication
  • Good compliance, written informed consent, and consent for NIBS long-term intervention treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe neuropsychiatric disorders or a previous history of severe neurologic conditions (e.g., epilepsy, cerebrovascular accident, etc.) or traumatic brain injury or brain surgery
  • inability to complete the questionnaire independently
  • Previous treatment with DBS or SCS; TMS or tDCS within 6 months
  • Severe physical illness and any physical condition that can precipitate epilepsy or intracranial hypertension, including cardiovascular and respiratory diseases
  • Installation of intracranial stents, pacemakers, coronary stents, cochlear implants, and other human implantable materials
  • is currently taking other investigational drugs or is participating in other clinical trials
  • Any other condition that the investigator believes makes him or her unsuitable for participation in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: muti-site stimulation group1
The intervention period: 2 weeks muti-site: individual target (iTBS OR cTBS) / M1 (iTBS)
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) includes a variety of noninvasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS), and so on. Theta burst stimulation(TBS) is a new form of excitatory or inhibitory rTMS treatment that is less time-consuming and more effective than traditional rTMS in a single treatment session.
Active Comparator: single-site stimulation group2
The intervention period: 2 weeks muti-site: individual target (sham) / M1 (iTBS)
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) includes a variety of noninvasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS), and so on. Theta burst stimulation(TBS) is a new form of excitatory or inhibitory rTMS treatment that is less time-consuming and more effective than traditional rTMS in a single treatment session.
Sham Comparator: sham stimulation group3
The intervention period: 2 weeks muti-site: individual target (sham) / M1 (sham)
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) includes a variety of noninvasive neuromodulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS), and so on. Theta burst stimulation(TBS) is a new form of excitatory or inhibitory rTMS treatment that is less time-consuming and more effective than traditional rTMS in a single treatment session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Group differences of part 3 of Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in UPDRS scores from baseline to post- treatment in the three intervention groups (UPDRS part3: range 0~72, higher score is related to a worse outcome).
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Group differences of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in PSPRS scores from baseline to post- treatment in the three intervention groups (psp patients specific).
6 weeks
Group differences of Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in UMSARS scores from baseline to post- treatment in the three intervention groups (MSA patients specific).
6 weeks
Group differences of Cortical Basal ganglia Functional Scale (CBFS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in CBFS scores from baseline to post- treatment in the three intervention groups (cbd patients specific).
6 weeks
Group differences of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in BBS scores from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups (BBS: range 0~56, higher score is related to a better outcome).
6 weeks
Group differences of Hamilton depression scale-17 (HAMD-17) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in HAMD-17 scores from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups (HAMD-17: range 0~38, higher score is related to a worse outcome).
6 weeks
Group differences of Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in HAMA scores from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups (HAMA: range 0~64, higher score is related to a worse outcome).
6 weeks
Group differences of Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in MMSE scores from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups (MMSE: range 0~30, higher score is related to a better outcome).
6 weeks
Group differences of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in MoCA scores from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups (MoCA: range 0~30, higher score is related to a better outcome).
6 weeks
Group differences of 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in PDQ-39 scores from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups (PDQ-39: range 0~156, higher score is related to a worse outcome).
6 weeks
Group differences of Wexner scores changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in Wexner scores from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups (Wexner: range 0~30, higher score is related to a worse outcome).
6 weeks
Group differences of Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA) changes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in SSA from baseline to post-treatment in the three intervention groups
6 weeks
Group differences of adverse event
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compare the changes in adverse event in the three intervention groups
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Clinical Trials on Neuromodulation

Subscribe