Promotion of Active Lifestyle in Pneumonia Patients

Rehabilitation Program for Promotion Active Lifestyle After Suffering a Pneumonia

Patients who have suffered a pneumonia used to reduce their activity levels because of the symptoms and the fear to suffer breathlessness. These patients often have sequelae after the hospitalization that previous studies have associated with a lack of physical activity.

The main objective of this research is to investigate the efficacy of a rehabilitation program for promotion higher activity levels in quality of life and self-perceived discapacity of pneumonia patients.

Study Overview

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Conditions: Pneumonia
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Physical Activity Promotion; Other: Control Intervention

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 66
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD; Phone Number: 958 248035; Email: cvalenza@ugr.es

Study Locations

• Spain
  • Granada, Spain, 18071
    • Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada
    • Contact: Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD; Phone Number: 958 248035; Email: cvalenza@ugr.es

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients of both sexes.
• Agreed to participate.
• Pneumonia patients meeting the diagnosis criteria for this disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Neurological or orthopaedic pathologies that limited voluntary movement.
• Cognitive impairment that prevented them from understanding and answering the questionnaires.
• Patients who don´t understand Spanish language

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Triple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group; Patients received an informational brochure in a consultation with a health professional. The brochure explained the importance of physical activity to improve the health condition of these patients. Patients had the opportunity to ask any questions to the healthcare professional.	Other: Control Intervention; Patients received an informational brochure in a consultation with a health professional. The brochure explained the importance of physical activity to improve the health condition of these patients. Patients had the opportunity to ask any questions to the healthcare professional
Experimental: Physical Activity Promotion Group; The rehabilitation program has the purpose of motivating patients to be more physically active. The treatment protocol had a total duration of 12 weeks. During hospitalization, an education of patients is conducted and physical activity is initiated. A diary is provided to patients to record the activities that they perform during each week until completing the 12 weeks. Additionally, phone calls are performed at 15 days, 1 and 2 months to motivate patients and answer any questions they may have.	Other: Physical Activity Promotion; This intervention includes a hospital-based and a home-based intervention. During the hospital stay, the patients were provided with a health education which included information about pneumonia pathophysiology, healthy-lifestyle habits, benefits of being physically active, and any questions patients may have would be answered. Additionally, an exercise program is provided, which includes resistance and aerobic exercise. At the end of the hospital stay, a diary is provided to patients for recording the physical activity that performing the following 3 months. This diary is accompanied by phone calls at 15 days, 1 and 2 months of the hospital stay. During the phone calls, patients are motivated to increase their activity levels, and any questions patients may have, are answered.; Other Names: Motivation for being more physically active

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Changes in discapacity	Changes in self-perceived discapacity were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores. The punctuation range from 36 to 144, and higher score indicate higher disability, worse.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in discapacity	Changes in self-perceived discapacity were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores. The punctuation range from 36 to 144, and higher score indicate higher disability, worse.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Changes in discapacity	Changes in self-perceived discapacity were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores. The punctuation range from 36 to 144, and higher score indicate higher disability, worse.	Baseline
Quality of life measure with EuroQol-5D-5L	Changes in quality of life were measured using the Euroqol 5dimensions. (Eq-5D) which comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. It also includes a visual analogue scale to report the health status from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better.	Baseline
Quality of life measure with EuroQol-5D-5L	Changes in quality of life were measured using the Euroqol 5dimensions which comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. It also includes a visual analogue scale to report the health status from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Quality of life measure with EuroQol-5D-5L	Changes in quality of life were measured using the Euroqol 5dimensions which comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. It also includes a visual analogue scale to report the health status from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate higher quality of life. Better.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Physical Activity Levels measure with IPAQ	The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed to measure health-related physical activity (PA) in populations. The activities are classified as vigorous, moderate and walking, and total METs are calculated. NO minimum or maximum valors are stablished. Higher scores indicates higher physical activity levels. Better.	Baseline
Physical Activity Levels measure with IPAQ	The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed to measure health-related physical activity (PA) in populations. The activities are classified as vigorous, moderate and walking, and total METs are calculated. NO minimum or maximum valors are stablished. Higher scores indicates higher physical activity levels. Better.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Dyspnoea measure with Borg Scale	the perceived dyspnoea is measure with the Borg Scale. This scale range from 0-10 where higher value indicate worse state, more dyspnoea.	Baseline
Dyspnoea measure with Borg Scale	the perceived dyspnoea is measure with the Borg Scale. This scale range from 0-10 where higher value indicate worse state, more dyspnoea.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Dyspnoea measure with Borg Scale	the perceived dyspnoea is measure with the Borg Scale. This scale range from 0-10 where higher value indicate worse state, more dyspnoea.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Changes in Performance status	The performance status is measure with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. In a semi structured interview, the patient is encouraged to discuss areas of activity that may present problems that they may need to, want to, or are expected to carry out on a regular basis. These problem areas are then rated in terms of importance to the patient´s life using the rating scale from 1 - 10, where 1 = not at all important, and 10 = extremely important to the client. The five most important problems are then the focus of intervention and the outcome measurement. The patient, using a similar scale, is then asked to rate his/her perception of performance and satisfaction with this performance in the selected problem areas. The two scores are separately summed and divided by the number of problem areas, giving the mean foreach.	Baseline
Changes in Performance status	The performance status is measure with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. In a semi structured interview, the patient is encouraged to discuss areas of activity that may present problems that they may need to, want to, or are expected to carry out on a regular basis. These problem areas are then rated in terms of importance to the patient´s life using the rating scale from 1 - 10, where 1 = not at all important, and 10 = extremely important to the client. The five most important problems are then the focus of intervention and the outcome measurement. The patient, using a similar scale, is then asked to rate his/her perception of performance and satisfaction with this performance in the selected problem areas. The two scores are separately summed and divided by the number of problem areas, giving the mean foreach.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in Performance status	The performance status is measure with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. In a semi structured interview, the patient is encouraged to discuss areas of activity that may present problems that they may need to, want to, or are expected to carry out on a regular basis. These problem areas are then rated in terms of importance to the patient´s life using the rating scale from 1 - 10, where 1 = not at all important, and 10 = extremely important to the client. The five most important problems are then the focus of intervention and the outcome measurement. The patient, using a similar scale, is then asked to rate his/her perception of performance and satisfaction with this performance in the selected problem areas. The two scores are separately summed and divided by the number of problem areas, giving the mean foreach.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Changes in Breathlessness Beliefs	The Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) is a concise 10-item self-report assessment tool used in the realm of respiratory health. It gauges an individual's perceptions and beliefs regarding breathlessness or dyspnea. Respondents rate their agreement with statements on a scale, often ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting their thoughts about the causes, consequences, and controllability of breathlessness. Higher scores may indicate more negative beliefs, while lower scores suggest more positive or adaptive beliefs. The BBQ aids in tailoring interventions and treatments for individuals with respiratory conditions, shedding light on the cognitive factors contributing to breathlessness-related distress and ultimately improving patient well-being and functional outcomes.	Baseline
Changes in Breathlessness Beliefs	The Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) is a concise 10-item self-report assessment tool used in the realm of respiratory health. It gauges an individual's perceptions and beliefs regarding breathlessness or dyspnea. Respondents rate their agreement with statements on a scale, often ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting their thoughts about the causes, consequences, and controllability of breathlessness. Higher scores may indicate more negative beliefs, while lower scores suggest more positive or adaptive beliefs. The BBQ aids in tailoring interventions and treatments for individuals with respiratory conditions, shedding light on the cognitive factors contributing to breathlessness-related distress and ultimately improving patient well-being and functional outcomes.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in Breathlessness Beliefs	The Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) is a concise 10-item self-report assessment tool used in the realm of respiratory health. It gauges an individual's perceptions and beliefs regarding breathlessness or dyspnea. Respondents rate their agreement with statements on a scale, often ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting their thoughts about the causes, consequences, and controllability of breathlessness. Higher scores may indicate more negative beliefs, while lower scores suggest more positive or adaptive beliefs. The BBQ aids in tailoring interventions and treatments for individuals with respiratory conditions, shedding light on the cognitive factors contributing to breathlessness-related distress and ultimately improving patient well-being and functional outcomes.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Changes in physical functioning	The physical functioning is measured using the "Short Physical Performance Battery" (SPPB). To assess usual walking speed (meters/second), the participants were asked to walk 4 metro at their regular pace twice from a standing position. The standing balance tests included side-by-side, semi-tandem, and full-tandem standing, and the participants were timed until they moved, or 10 s had elapsed. To assess the 5-times sit-to-stand test, the participants were asked to perform five chair stands as quickly as possible. Time (in seconds) was registered with a stopwatch with a resolution of 0.01 s. The total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 12 points (best). An increase of 1-point is recommended in disability research.	Baseline
Changes in physical functioning	The physical functioning is measured using the "Short Physical Performance Battery" (SPPB). To assess usual walking speed (meters/second), the participants were asked to walk 4 metro at their regular pace twice from a standing position. The standing balance tests included side-by-side, semi-tandem, and full-tandem standing, and the participants were timed until they moved, or 10 s had elapsed. To assess the 5-times sit-to-stand test, the participants were asked to perform five chair stands as quickly as possible. Time (in seconds) was registered with a stopwatch with a resolution of 0.01 s. The total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 12 points (best). An increase of 1-point is recommended in disability research.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in physical functioning	The physical functioning is measured using the "Short Physical Performance Battery" (SPPB). To assess usual walking speed (meters/second), the participants were asked to walk 4 metro at their regular pace twice from a standing position. The standing balance tests included side-by-side, semi-tandem, and full-tandem standing, and the participants were timed until they moved, or 10 s had elapsed. To assess the 5-times sit-to-stand test, the participants were asked to perform five chair stands as quickly as possible. Time (in seconds) was registered with a stopwatch with a resolution of 0.01 s. The total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 12 points (best). An increase of 1-point is recommended in disability research.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Changes in Maximal Grip Strength	Maximal grip strength was assessed using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. The participant was told to squeeze it as hard as possible and then release. This procedure was repeated three times with each hand alternating between both hands with 5 minutes rest between the trials. The grip strength was recorded in kg and the highest of the three trials was used.	Baseline
Changes in Maximal Grip Strength	Maximal grip strength was assessed using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. The participant was told to squeeze it as hard as possible and then release. This procedure was repeated three times with each hand alternating between both hands with 5 minutes rest between the trials. The grip strength was recorded in kg and the highest of the three trials was used.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in Maximal Grip Strength	Maximal grip strength was assessed using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. The participant was told to squeeze it as hard as possible and then release. This procedure was repeated three times with each hand alternating between both hands with 5 minutes rest between the trials. The grip strength was recorded in kg and the highest of the three trials was used.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Changes in Symptoms	The perceived pain and Fatigue are measured with a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to10, where 0 indicate no presence of pain or fatigue, and 10 indicate worst fatigue or pain.	Baseline
Changes in Symptoms	The perceived pain and Fatigue are measured with a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to10, where 0 indicate no presence of pain or fatigue, and 10 indicate worst fatigue or pain.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in Symptoms	The perceived pain and Fatigue are measured with a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to10, where 0 indicate no presence of pain or fatigue, and 10 indicate worst fatigue or pain.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge
Changes in Psycho-emotional status	The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) scale asks respondents to answer 21 questions focused on experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in the past week. Participants were provided four response options: 0=never, 1=sometimes, 2=a lot of the time, 3=most or all of the time. Higher response values, and higher scores, indicate higher levels of experiencing the condition measured.	Baseline
Changes in Psycho-emotional status	The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) scale asks respondents to answer 21 questions focused on experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in the past week. Participants were provided four response options: 0=never, 1=sometimes, 2=a lot of the time, 3=most or all of the time. Higher response values, and higher scores, indicate higher levels of experiencing the condition measured.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in Psycho-emotional status	The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) scale asks respondents to answer 21 questions focused on experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in the past week. Participants were provided four response options: 0=never, 1=sometimes, 2=a lot of the time, 3=most or all of the time. Higher response values, and higher scores, indicate higher levels of experiencing the condition measured.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge]
Changes in managing the own healthcare	The Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) is a concise assessment tool designed to evaluate an individual's knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing their own healthcare. Comprising 13 items, this self-report questionnaire helps healthcare professionals and researchers gauge a patient's level of activation and engagement in their healthcare journey. Respondents answer a series of questions related to their health-related knowledge, confidence in managing their health, and their proactivity in seeking healthcare information and making informed decisions. The score range from 13 to 52. Higher PAM-13 scores indicate a higher level of patient activation, which is often associated with better health outcomes and more effective self-management of chronic conditions.	Immediately after the hospital stay
Changes in managing the own healthcare	The Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13) is a concise assessment tool designed to evaluate an individual's knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing their own healthcare. Comprising 13 items, this self-report questionnaire helps healthcare professionals and researchers gauge a patient's level of activation and engagement in their healthcare journey. Respondents answer a series of questions related to their health-related knowledge, confidence in managing their health, and their proactivity in seeking healthcare information and making informed decisions. The score range from 13 to 52. Higher PAM-13 scores indicate a higher level of patient activation, which is often associated with better health outcomes and more effective self-management of chronic conditions.	At 12 weeks at the hospital discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Universidad de Granada
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Marie Carmen Valenza, PhD, Universidad de Granada

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Estimated): January 20, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): March 1, 2024
• Study Completion (Estimated): June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 15, 2023
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 12, 2024
• First Posted (Actual): January 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): January 16, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 12, 2024
• Last Verified: January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Rehabilitation; Pneumonia; Activity Promotion
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Infections; Respiratory Tract Infections; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Lung Diseases; Pneumonia
• Other Study ID Numbers: DF0100UG

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No