Dynamic-orthosis Programs for Stroke Hand Function

December 23, 2024 updated by: Jer-Hao Chang, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Development of Innovative Modular 3D-Printed Dynamic Orthoses: Application Programs for Hand Function Facilitation in Patients With Stroke

This study aims to investigate the training benefits of modular 3D printed dynamic orthoses on upper limb function in stroke survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized controlled intervention trial. Participants are recruited from two medical centers in Taiwan and undergo a continuous 6-week intervention for post-stroke movement rehabilitation. The control group receives traditional stroke occupational therapy rehabilitation. The experimental group, in addition to traditional treatment, supplements their therapy with the use of modular 3D printed dynamic orthoses developed by the research team for home training. Both groups undergo two effectiveness follow-up assessments, one month and two months after the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 701
        • Recruiting
        • National Cheng Kung University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Onset of stroke at least three months ago;
  2. Upper limb Brunnstrom stage II~IV;
  3. Shoulder can actively flex at least 45 degrees.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Affected hand has regained autonomous grasping function, able to grasp and release a tennis ball 10 times within 2 minutes;
  2. Joint deformity or stiffness in the affected hand that prevents the use of the dynamic orthosis;
  3. Diagnosis of other neurological disorders affecting motor control, such as neglect, Parkinson's disease, etc.;
  4. Inability to follow therapist guidance;
  5. Currently undergoing other specific treatments affecting motor function recovery (such as rTMS and BTX).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dynamic-orthosis training group
Participants will undergo traditional occupational therapy (2-3 times per week, one hour per session, for a total of six weeks), supplemented with an additional home-based dynamic orthotic therapy program (five days per week, one hour per session, for six weeks). The style of the dynamic orthosis will be selected by the researchers based on the participants' movement performance and rehabilitation goals, and it will be adjusted or replaced as their abilities progress.
Engaging in motion training at home with the use of dynamic orthoses.
Traditional post-stroke movement training arranged by an occupational therapist in a medical setting.
Other: Regular training group
Participants will receive traditional occupational therapy (2-3 sessions per week, one hour per session, for a total of six weeks). The training program includes muscle strength training, reaching and grasping exercises, manual tone control, motor facilitation, and activities of daily living training. During the study period, participants will not wear any hand dynamic orthosis during training.
Traditional post-stroke movement training arranged by an occupational therapist in a medical setting.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment- Upper Extremity
Time Frame: Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is a specialized test designed for evaluating motor function in individuals post-stroke. It employs an ordinal scale to score 33 items related to upper limb movements, with a total score of 66 points. Each item reflects movements indicative of motor function in post-stroke hemiparetic patients, covering a range from proximal to distal joints.

The FMA-UE has undergone extensive testing and has been found to possess excellent psychometric properties. It is considered an effective assessment tool for upper limb motor function, particularly suitable for chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe impairments.

Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)
Box and Block Test
Time Frame: Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)
The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a tool used to assess manual dexterity, known for its short assessment time, simplicity, and ease of understanding. It exhibits excellent test-retest reliability (0.96) and inter-rater reliability (0.99). The test involves counting the number of cubes a person can move within one minute, with a higher quantity indicating better functionality. The size of the cubes is 2.5cm³, and there are a total of 150 cubes. Past research suggests a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) value of 5.5 cubes for the BBT.
Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)
Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a questionnaire-based assessment that evaluates the amount of use (AOU) and quality of movement (QOM) of the affected side in daily activities. The scoring for amount of use ranges from 0 (never using the affected hand in the activity) to 5 (always using the affected hand in the activity). Quality of movement is scored from 0 (unable to use the affected hand) to 5 (movement quality comparable to pre-stroke). There are a total of 28 items in the assessment, recording the average scores for both amount of use and movement quality for each item. Previous research has demonstrated good construct validity for this scale, with a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) ranging from 1.0 to 1.1 points.
Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth scale
Time Frame: Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)
The MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale) utilizes quick stretching to assess muscle tone, with testing conducted on the upper limb, specifically the hand, elbow, wrist, and fingers. For ease of statistical analysis, the scale is converted into numerical values ranging from 0 to 5, with lower scores indicating lower muscle tone.
Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)
Upper limb joint range of motion
Time Frame: Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)
This study will use a goniometer to measure the upper limb joint range of motion in patients, including the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers. The measurements encompass passive range of motion (PROM), active range of motion without wearing orthosis (AROM), and active-assisted range of motion with orthosis assistance (AAROM).
Pre-test(Week 0), post-test(Week 6), follow-up assessment(Week 10 & Week 14)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: JERHAO CHANG, PhD, National Cheng Kung University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Dynamic-orthosis

Subscribe