Effectiveness of Cognitive Stimulation Treatment in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Evaluation of the Cognitive Stimulation Treatment in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the relationship between GBA mutation and cognitive stimulation treatment response in patients with Parkinson's disease. The main questions it aim to answer are: • assess whether the GBA mutation is associated with greater or lesser response to cognitive training treatment compared to a control group of PD patients without genetic mutations. • investigate the effect of cognitive stimulation program on behavioural aspects as secondary consequence induced by the possible improvement of cognitive abilities following treatment.

Participants will be undergo to: - a neuropsychological evaluation describing their cognitive profile; - a genetic investigation and finally included in a cognitive stimulation programs according to regular clinical practice. Researchers will compare PD patients with GBA mutation and patients without genetic mutation to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive stimulation treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Experimental group: 34 PD patients with GBA gene mutation and undergoing cognitive stimulation treatment;
  • Control group: 34 patients with idiopathic PD without known genetic mutation undergoing cognitive stimulation treatment.

The allocation of subjects to the two groups will be paired (1:1) by age ( 2 aa), sex, staging and duration of the disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Parkinson's disease according to the Gelb et al. criteria;
  • Patients who have carried out genetic screening for MP;
  • Patients who have a raw score in the range 15.50 to 22.23 at Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA);
  • Patients who have signed the informed consent and the Privacy Policy;
  • Patients who are included in cognitive stimulation programs according to regular clinical practice.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the initial suspicion of MP that during the diagnostic work-up they were suffering from a different pathology;
  • Patients who have refused consent to participate in the study;
  • Patients with a diagnosis of MP and cognitive profile of dementia;
  • Patients undergoing deep brain neurostimulation (DBS-STN) treatment. Patients treated with DBS-STN were excluded because such treatment involves a surgical procedure whose effects on cognitive functioning could represent an interfering variable.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PD with GBA gene mutation
Patients with Parkinson's disease and GBA gene mutation treated with cognitive training
The training, provided by normal clinical practice, will consist of two cycles of cognitive stimulation (8 sessions each) structured and aimed at maintaining and learning compensatory strategies that take advantage of the integrated cognitive skills.
PD without genetic mutation
Patients with Parkinson's disease without genetic mutation treated with cognitive training
The training, provided by normal clinical practice, will consist of two cycles of cognitive stimulation (8 sessions each) structured and aimed at maintaining and learning compensatory strategies that take advantage of the integrated cognitive skills.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of the cognitive training on cognitive function in PD patients with GBA mutation compared to a control group of PD patients without genetic mutations.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Improvement in cognitive function after eight weeks of cognitive training as measured by the battery of italian neuropsychological tests (pencil/computer paper). The neuropsychological battery consists of domain-specific cognitive tests that will provide an aggregate measure of cognitive improvement between pre and post-treatment. Higher score indicates an improvement on cognitive function.
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Cognitive Reserve (CR) is a concept based on the plasticity of the brain and an higher CR lowers the risk for incidence of dementia. The CRIq consists of 20 questions collecting demographic information, the number of years of education, and occupational and leisure activities throughout adulthood including the frequency of the activities.
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Beck Depression Inventory 2 (BDI-II): is a 21-item self-administered inventory designed to measure the intensity of depressive symptoms. Items are rated on a 4 point scale, with total scores obtained by summing the ratings for all items. Scores ranging between 0 and 13 are indicative of minimal depression. Scores ranging between 14 and 19 are indicative of mild level of depression while a score rangin from 29 to 63 is labeled severe.
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Self-Rating Anxiety Sate (SAS): The SAS is a 20-item self-report assessment device built to measure anxiety levels, based on scoring in 4 groups of manifestations: cognitive, autonomic, motor and central nervous system symptoms. Each question is scored on a Likert-type scale of 1-4 (based on these replies: "a little of the time", "some of the time", "good part of the time", "most of the time"). The total raw scores range from 20 to 80. Higher score indicates higher anxiety levels.
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL): Instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) are those activities that allow an individual to live independently in a community and can significantly improve the quality of life. The final total score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent).
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL): Instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) are those activities that allow an individual to live independently in a community and can significantly improve the quality of life. The final total score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent).the higher the score, the greater the person's abilities.
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
IActivities of daily living (ADL): the ADL refers to activities oriented toward taking care of one's own body. These activities are fundamental to living in a social world; they enable basic survival and well-being, such as bathing, toileting, dressing and eating. Total score: between 6 (maximum performance) and 0 (lack of performance). the higher the score, the greater the person's abilities.
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the degree of expectation and subsequently on the degree of benefit of treatment, ranges from 0 (low benefit) to 10 (high benefit).
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
The effect of cognitive training on behavioural aspects in PD patients.
Time Frame: Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training
Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life 8 Questions (PDQ-8). The PDQ-8 is a self-administered questionnaire, used to measure quality of life in persons with Parkinson's disease. Each question is scored from 0-4 points and the scores are summed. The summed score is then divided by total possible score and given as a percentage score out of 100. A higher score represents a worse quality of life.
Baseline and Six months follow-up post cognitive training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Cognitive training

3
Subscribe