Acupuncture + Neuromodulation for Post-Stroke Aphasia

Efficacy and Mechanism Study of Acupuncture Combined With Neuromodulation Technology for Post-Stroke Aphasia Based on Multimodal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture combined with neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia and to explore the brain mechanisms involved. The study seeks to answer two primary questions: the effectiveness of the integrated intervention of acupuncture and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on post-stroke aphasia, and the mechanisms underlying language function impairment and recovery.

The research is divided into two parts:

Part One:

Participants will be randomized into two groups:

Group A: Receives low-frequency rTMS followed by high-frequency rTMS. Group B: Receives high-frequency rTMS followed by low-frequency rTMS.

Part Two:

Participants will be randomized into four groups:

rTMS Experimental Group: Individualized targets and intervention methods based on integrated fMRI and behavioral data. The rTMS intervention involves continuous treatment for two weeks, 5 sessions per week, each lasting 10-25 minutes, at 80% of the active motor threshold (AMT).

rTMS Control Group: Standard rTMS protocol guided by clinical recommendations, with continuous treatment for two weeks, 5 sessions per week, each 20 minutes, at 80% AMT.

Electroacupuncture Group: Points include Speech Area 1 (Yan Yu Yi Qu 1), Speech Area 2 (Yan Yu Yi Qu 2), Fengchi (Fengchi, GB20), Tiantu (Tiantu, CV22), Tongli (Tongli, HT5), Lianquan (Lianquan, CV23), and Paralianquan (Pang Lianquan). After needle insertion and obtaining Qi, electrical stimulation is applied with a discontinuous wave at 2Hz, at a tolerable intensity for the patient, for 30 minutes each session.

Combined rTMS and Electroacupuncture Group: Combines both intervention methods as described above.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aphasia is a severe disabling consequence of stroke, typically caused by damage to the cortical and subcortical structures perfused by the left middle cerebral artery. Studies have indicated that over 20% of stroke patients develop aphasia. Although most patients exhibit some degree of spontaneous recovery within the first month after stroke, a significant number still suffer from chronic deficits six months post-stroke. Conventional rehabilitation methods and traditional Chinese medicine techniques often encounter efficacy plateaus in the treatment process. Therefore, there is an urgent need for innovative language therapy strategies to maximize recovery from aphasia. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), have the potential to modulate cortical excitability and plasticity. Acupuncture therapy can activate language neural functions, establish collateral cerebral vascular circulation, and reconstruct the neural circuitry of language motor control. However, when facing patients with complex post-stroke aphasia, there are certain limitations. This study employs a randomized, blinded, controlled clinical design to verify the therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating post-stroke aphasia and to explore the underlying brain mechanisms of recovery.

The research is divided into two parts:

Part One:

Participants will be randomized into two groups:

Group A: Receives low-frequency rTMS followed by high-frequency rTMS. Group B: Receives high-frequency rTMS followed by low-frequency rTMS.

Part Two:

Participants will be randomized into four groups:

rTMS Experimental Group: Individualized targets and intervention methods based on integrated fMRI and behavioral data. The rTMS intervention involves continuous treatment for two weeks, 5 sessions per week, each lasting 10-25 minutes, at 80% of the active motor threshold (AMT).

rTMS Control Group: Standard rTMS protocol guided by clinical recommendations, with continuous treatment for two weeks, 5 sessions per week, each 20 minutes, at 80% AMT.

Electroacupuncture Group: Points include Speech Area 1 (Yan Yu Yi Qu 1), Speech Area 2 (Yan Yu Yi Qu 2), Fengchi (Fengchi, GB20), Tiantu (Tiantu, CV22), Tongli (Tongli, HT5), Lianquan (Lianquan, CV23), and Paralianquan (Pang Lianquan). After needle insertion and obtaining Qi, electrical stimulation is applied with a discontinuous wave at 2Hz, at a tolerable intensity for the patient, for 30 minutes each session.

Combined rTMS and Electroacupuncture Group: Combines both intervention methods as described above.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200080
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Yueyang Integrated Medicine Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with aphasia following stroke according to both traditional Chinese and Western medical standards; first-time stroke in the left cerebral hemisphere (including cerebral infarction and cerebral hemorrhage), with unilateral lesion.
  2. Age between 25 and 75 years old, disease course of at least 1 month, no gender restrictions.
  3. Right-handed as tested by the Edinburgh Handness Inventory, with at least an elementary school education level.
  4. Retention of basic cognitive functions such as attention, memory, and visuospatial skills (Non-language-based Cognitive Assessment, NLCA score >70).
  5. Aphasia confirmed by initial assessment with the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB); an Aphasia Quotient (AQ) <93.8 indicates aphasia.
  6. Possess a certain level of auditory comprehension and can tolerate research examinations lasting 0.5-1 hour.
  7. The subject and their legal guardian understand and consent to participate in this study and have jointly signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Moderate to severe dysarthria as assessed by the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment.
  2. Severe speech apraxia or oral-facial apraxia.
  3. Significant anxiety or moderate to severe depressive symptoms as assessed by the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Scales.
  4. Pre-stroke speech or language disorders.
  5. Severe systemic diseases such as cardiopulmonary diseases that cannot tolerate rehabilitation treatment or infectious diseases.
  6. Significant sleep disorders or mental disorders.
  7. Pregnant or lactating women.
  8. Contraindications for MRI examination (presence of metal foreign bodies or other implanted electronic devices in the body).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combined Low- and High-Frequency rTMS Intervention
Participants will receive a combined intervention of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz) and high-frequency rTMS (5Hz) using an 8-shaped coil, with each frequency's treatment duration and pulse count aligning with the protocol provided.
This intervention involves the application of rTMS using an 8-shaped coil with a frequency of 1Hz for low-frequency stimulation and 5Hz for high-frequency stimulation, in accordance with the study protocol.
Experimental: Combined High- and Low-Frequency rTMS Intervention
Similar to Arm A, but the order of interventions is reversed, starting with high-frequency rTMS followed by low-frequency rTMS.
Similar to Arm A, but the sequence of low and high-frequency rTMS is reversed.
Experimental: rTMS Experimental Group: Individualized Precision rTMS Therapy
Participants will undergo individualized precision rTMS therapy based on integrated analysis of assessment data, with a continuous two-week intervention, 10-25 minutes per session, at an intensity of 80% of the active motor threshold (AMT).
Participants receive an individualized rTMS therapy plan based on integrated analysis of assessment data, targeting specific brain areas to enhance language function recovery post-stroke.
Participants receive a conventional rTMS treatment as per established guidelines, serving as an active comparator to the experimental interventions.
Other Names:
  • Control Group
Experimental: rTMS + Acupuncture Group: rTMS Combined with "Kaiqiao Jieyan" Acupuncture Therapy
Participants will receive both the aforementioned rTMS therapy and "Kaiqiao Jieyan" acupuncture therapy, including specific acupoint selection and manipulation techniques.
Participants undergo a combined treatment of rTMS as described for the rTMS Experimental Group and traditional Chinese acupuncture based on the "Kaiqiao Jieyan" method, targeting specific acupoints to facilitate recovery.
Active Comparator: rTMS Control Group: Conventional rTMS Intervention
Participants will receive conventional rTMS intervention according to the guidelines' recommended strategies.
Participants receive an individualized rTMS therapy plan based on integrated analysis of assessment data, targeting specific brain areas to enhance language function recovery post-stroke.
Participants receive a conventional rTMS treatment as per established guidelines, serving as an active comparator to the experimental interventions.
Other Names:
  • Control Group
Active Comparator: Acupuncture Group: "Kaiqiao Jieyan" Acupuncture Therapy Alone
Participants will receive only "Kaiqiao Jieyan" acupuncture therapy, without rTMS intervention.
Participants receive "Kaiqiao Jieyan" acupuncture therapy alone, without rTMS, following traditional Chinese medicine protocols for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB)
Time Frame: Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
Western Aphasia Battery (WAB): Assesses aphasia severity in speech, comprehension, reading, and writing. Score Range: WAB-derived AQ scores range from 0 (severe impairment) to 100 (no impairment). Interpretation: Higher AQ scores on the WAB indicate better language function in aphasia patients.
Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Token Test (Abbreviated Version)
Time Frame: Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
Token Test (Abbreviated Version): The abbreviated Token Test will be utilized to evaluate patients' spoken language comprehension and abstract thinking abilities. This assessment will provide insights into the participants' cognitive and linguistic capacities.
Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
Boston Naming Test
Time Frame: Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
The Boston Naming Test will evaluate patients' ability to name 30 common items from pictures, measuring improvements in naming abilities.
Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA FACS).
Time Frame: Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
ASHA FACS assesses functional communication in aphasia, including basic needs and social integration. Score Range - Communicative Independence Scale: 1 (maximal assistance) to 7 (independence) across 43 items. Score Range - Qualitative Dimensions Scale: 1 (poor quality) to 5 (excellent quality). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better communication outcomes in aphasia.
Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)
Time Frame: Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) is used to evaluate the health-related quality of life in stroke patients, focusing on the specific impacts of stroke on daily living and well-being. Scale Title: Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL). Score Range: The SS-QOL score ranges from 1.0 (lowest quality of life) to 5.0 (highest quality of life). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a better quality of life for stroke survivors.
Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
Multimodal MRI Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.
This includes 3D structural MRI (sMRI), functional MRI (fMRI) during task performance and at rest, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) to evaluate changes in brain structure and function.
Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment. Immediately Post-Intervention: Assessment at the end of the 2-week intervention. Follow-Up Assessments: Assessments are also conducted at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia, Rehabilitation

Clinical Trials on Combined Low- and High-Frequency rTMS Intervention

Subscribe