Effects of rTMS Based on Brain Activation During Language Performance in Stroke Patients With Non-fluent Aphasia

August 29, 2022 updated by: Nam-Jong Paik, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Based on Brain Activation During Language Performance in Stroke Patients With Non-fluent Aphasia: A Pilot Study

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of high or low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation based on brain activation with functional near infrared spectroscopy in poststroke nonfluent aphasia patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In poststsroke aphasia rehabilitation, repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) studies aimed to reinforce the activity of the brain regions in the left hemisphere. This goal can be achieved by using an excitatory protocol to reactivate the perilesional area or inhibitory protocol to reduce activities in the contralesional area. However, most conventional rTMS studies employed an inhibitory low frequency protocol for the contralesional homologs of Broca's area.

In the present pilot study, investigators will perform functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) prior to rTMS treatment for selection of the most appropriate application of stimulation. Stimulation site and protocol (high frequency or low frequency rTMS) will be determined by activation pattern from the fNIRS findings with language task in individual patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Korea, Gyeonggi-do
      • Seongnam-si, Korea, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-80 yrs old
  • Right-handed
  • Radiologically confirmed left hemisphere stroke
  • Fluent in Korean
  • First ever stroke
  • More than 1 year from stroke onset
  • Non-fluent (motor-dominant) aphasia
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous medical histories of stroke, cerebral vascular operation, seizure
  • Patients with traumatic brain injury
  • Unable to perform the language task
  • Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE less than 16)
  • Skin lesion in the stimulation site of scalp
  • Metal implants in the body (cardiac pacemaker or aneurysm clip)
  • Pregnancy, Breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High frequency rTMS
Most activated area from fNIRS with language task: Perileisional Broca's area
Most activated area from fNIRS findings: Perileisional Broca's area, High frequency rTMS (10Hz), Number of total stimuli: 800, Location: perilesional Broca's area, Intensity: 100% of resting motor threshold, Coil orientation: tangential to scalp, in combination with speech therapy(35-40min) after each rTMS session, Daily 10 treatment session
Active Comparator: Low Frequency rTMS
Most activated area from fNIRS with language task: Contralesional homologs of Broca's area
Most activated area from fNIRS findings: Contralesional homologs of Broca's area, Low frequency rTMS (1Hz), Number of total stimuli: 1200, Location: Contralesional homologs of Broca's area (Pars triangularis), Intensity: 90% of resting motor threshold, Coil orientation: tangential to scalp, in combination with speech therapy(35-40min) after each rTMS session, Daily 10 treatment session

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BNT (Boston naming test)
Time Frame: Before rTMS(baseline), after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy), 2 weeks later after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy)
speech evaluation tool for measuring the confrontational word retrieval function
Before rTMS(baseline), after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy), 2 weeks later after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WAB (Western aphasia battery)
Time Frame: Before rTMS(baseline), after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy), 2 weeks later after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy)
speech evaluation tool for screening the presence, degree, and type of aphaisa
Before rTMS(baseline), after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy), 2 weeks later after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy)
Laterality index (LI)
Time Frame: Before rTMS(baseline), after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy), 2 weeks later after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy)
From fNIRS findings, LI=L-R/L+R (L and R represent maximum or mean left and Right hemisphereic Hbo values, respectively)
Before rTMS(baseline), after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy), 2 weeks later after the completion of 10 session of treatment (rTMS+speech therapy)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nam-Jong Paik, MD, PhD, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 24, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 24, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on High frequency rTMS

Subscribe