Impact of Transepithelial Abutment Connection and Disconnection in Dental Implants
Impact of Connection and Disconnection of the Transepithelial Abutment in Dental Implants
Over the past decade, implant research has focused on maintaining the health and stability of peri-implant tissues. A key factor is platform switching at the bone level, where a narrower abutment than the implant is used. This technique increases the implant's horizontal surface area for biological width establishment and reduces stress on the crestal bone.
Studies showed that repeated disconnection and reconnection of prosthetic components could compromise the mucosal barrier around implants, leading to an apical shift in the connective tissue junction and vertical tissue loss. This led to the "one abutment, one time" protocol, advocating the placement of the definitive abutment during initial implant surgery to avoid its removal during healing.
A recent meta-analysis indicated bone loss at the marginal level due to abutment connection and disconnection, despite different treatment protocols. Thus, a standardized abutment between the fixed prosthesis and the implant has been recommended to preserve marginal bone levels. This approach moves the biological width apically, protecting the bone from irritation and improving marginal bone isolation.
However, comparative evidence between direct implant-connected prostheses and trans-epithelial abutments is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the "one abutment, one time" protocol's effect on bone loss 12 months after prosthesis placement.
Secondary objectives include assessing patient satisfaction using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) during prosthesis fabrication and placement, and obtaining information on the diversity and function of microorganisms on the implant using metagenomic techniques 12 months post-prosthesis placement.
Throughout the prosthesis fabrication and the first 12 months, various evaluations will be conducted in both abutment and Ti-base groups:
- **Bleeding:** Recorded during various prosthetic stages.
- **Pain:** Assessed using a visual analog scale after each stage.
- **Anesthesia:** Recorded if used at each stage.
- **Radiographs:** Number taken to check the fit.
- **Time:** Measured for each prosthetic phase.
- **Repetitions:** Number of repeated procedures quantified.
- **Metagenomic tests:** Samples collected following the Human Microbiome Project protocol to analyze microbial diversity and function.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Valencia, Spain, 46010
- Clínica Odontológica de la Universitat de Valencia, Fundación Lluis Alcanyis
-
Valencia, Spain, 46010
- Facultad de Medicina y Odontología de la Universitat de València
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy partially edentulous adult patients needing at least two implants for the placement of single or consecutive crowns in the posterior mandible or maxilla will be recruited.
- These patients should exhibit a plaque index and gingival bleeding index of less than 25%, and have sufficient bone height and width for the placement of dental implants measuring 8 or 10 mm in length and 3.5 or 4 mm in diameter.
- Additionally, they must have at least 2 mm of keratinized vestibular gingiva, stable occlusion, and a periodontium in good health
Exclusion Criteria:
- Edentulous areas requiring bone grafts will be excluded.
- Patients with medical conditions contraindicating implant surgery, such as severe bruxism or inadequate oral hygiene.
- Pregnant or lactating women, patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy, those receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the head and neck area, non-compliant patients with incomplete data records, and those who do not attend regular follow-up appointments will also be excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Abutment Group
The patients in this group will undergo implant placement surgery using the conventional technique, which will include a full-thickness flap, biological drilling, and sub-crestal implant placement at 2 mm below the crest level. Since this is the Pilar group (Galimplant aesthetic straight abutment, NUEVAGALIMPANT), a 3 mm abutment will be placed during the same procedure, secured with a torque of 30 N. A healing cap will be applied and maintained until the osseointegration process is completed after three months. After three months, this group will receive a cement-retained and screw-retained zirconia prosthesis, which will be placed over the previously installed abutment. The crown screw will be torqued to 25 N. |
Placement of a subcrestal implant at more than 35 N and placement of a trans-epithelial abutment at 30 N
|
|
Experimental: ti-base Group
The patients in this group will undergo implant placement surgery using the conventional technique, which will include a full-thickness flap, biological drilling, and sub-crestal implant placement at 2 mm below the crest level. Since this is the Tibase group (3 mm Tibase from Galimplant, NUEVAGALIMPANT), submerged healing will be performed with a healing cap connected to the implant, which will remain in place until the osseointegration process is completed after three months. After three months of osseointegration, a prosthesis will be placed directly connected to the implant platform via the 3 mm Tibase. The screw will be tightened to 30 N. |
Placement of a subcrestal implant at more than 35 N and placement of a Tibase placement at 30 N
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
periimplant marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The peri-implant marginal bone level was measured using Image J software from the National Institutes of Health with an accuracy of 0.1 mm.
A straight line was drawn at the implant platform level (representing zero height), and perpendicular lines were drawn from the mesial and distal sides of the platform to measure the distance to the bone level on each side
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3395885
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.