Clinical Evaluation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide Wet Bonding Technique

October 8, 2024 updated by: Philip Pradeep, Manipal University College Malaysia

Clinical Evaluation of Dimethyl Sulfoxide Wet Bonding Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) wet bonding has shown promising results in several in vitro studies. However, there are a lack of clinical trials which prove the advantages of this technique. The aim of the study is to clinically assess the effect of DMSO wet bonding on composite restoration in non carious cervical lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Two similar non carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the facial/labial surfaces of premolars.
  • NCCLs of score 1-3 on the Smith and Knight tooth wear index.
  • Favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal contact.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • NCCLs on the lingual surface.
  • Medically compromised individuals.
  • Periodontally compromised teeth.
  • Bruxism and visible wear facets in the posterior dentition.
  • Fractured or visibly cracked premolars and canines.
  • Known allergies to resin-based restorative materials.
  • Presently undergoing orthodontic treatment.
  • Abutment teeth for fixed or removable prostheses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Universal single bond adhesive
Will be applied and light cured for 20 seconds.
Experimental: DMSO application before Universal single bond adhesive
Will be applied and light cured for 20 seconds.
DMSO application on tooth followed by active application of universal single bond adhesive and light cured for 20 seconds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fracture of material
Time Frame: From treatment to 3-6 months follow up
Different fracture patterns and retention failures may occur in relation to the type of restoration: cracks, chipping/ delamination, bulk fractures, or incomplete and complete loss of retention. Assessed by Visual examination and short air drying. Criteria set from Clinically excellent/very good(sufficient) (Score 1) to Clinically poor (entirely insufficient)(Score 5)
From treatment to 3-6 months follow up
Marginal adaptation
Time Frame: From treatment to 3-6 months follow up

There are different interfaces between the dental hard tissue, restorative material, and adhesive and/or luting resin/cement layer. Each interface can degrade and potentially alter marginal adaptation. In clinical practice, it is impossible to distinguish failures between the different interfaces. Therefore, only the marginal adaptation as such can be assessed by visual examination and short air drying.

Scores given depending upon the quality of restoration from Clinically excellent/very good (sufficient) (Score 1) to Clinically poor (entirely insufficient) (Score 5)

From treatment to 3-6 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 049/2023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dimethyl Sulfoxide

Clinical Trials on Universal single bond adhesive

Subscribe