Evaluation of Cervical Restorations Performance Using Modified Universal Adhesive

October 14, 2024 updated by: Basma Gamal Dawoud, Cairo University

Evaluation of Cervical Restorations Performance Using Modified Universal Adhesive Compared to Conventional Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Class V restorations are evaluated to reveal whether the use of modified universal adhesive will have a similar performance compared to conventional universal adhesive or not.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

The innovative Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive offers all the benefits of its predecessor, Single Bond Universal Adhesive as demonstrated by a 3M field evaluation comparing the performance of the two products. These benefits include:

  • Compatibility with all etching techniques - total-etch, self-etch, and selective enamel etch.
  • Usage with direct and indirect indications.
  • Bonding to all dental surfaces without the need for separate primers or silanes
  • Virtually no post-operative sensitivity.

The newly modified adhesive with its careful formulation offers:

  • Radiopacity like dentin to reduce the risk of X-ray misdiagnosis and overtreatment.
  • Ability to bond and seal caries-affected dentin to support minimally invasive preparation guidelines and maximize preservation of natural tooth structure.
  • Adhesion to all dental substrates and all direct and indirect materials, including glass ceramics.
  • Full dual- and self-cure compatibility without the need for an additional dual-cure activator bottle.
  • A BPA derivative-free formulation to alleviate concerns about BPA in dental materials
  • A fully aligned system with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement, offering excellent bond strength for virtually all dual-cure resin cement indications.

As with any new material or technique, long-term clinical evaluations are needed to demonstrate the value of universal bonding agents adequately. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the modified universal adhesive, versus the conventional universal adhesive, for restoring carious class V cavities over one year and a half.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Small to moderate carious cervical lesions. (ICDAS scores 3,4)
  • Upper premolar teeth.
  • Good oral hygiene (mild to moderate plaque accumulation)
  • Vital teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Presence of favorable occlusion and normal contact with adjacent teeth.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic diseases, severe medical complications or allergic history concerning methacrylates.
  • Lack of patient compliance, pregnancy, rampant caries, heavy smoking or xerostomia.
  • Evidence of parafunctional habits and TMJ disorders.
  • Class V lesions in molars.
  • Non-carious cervical lesions.
  • Deep carious defects (close to pulp, less than 1 mm distance).
  • Teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
  • Endodontically treated teeth.
  • Tooth hypersensitivity.
  • Possible prosthodontic restoration of teeth.
  • Heavy occlusion and occlusal contacts or history of bruxism.
  • Severe periodontal affection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Carious cervical lesions treated with modified universal adhesive
Preparation of class V cavity with removal of caries and beveling of margins is done followed by total etching prior to application of modified universal adhesive. The cavity is then restored with nano-filled resin composite.
Application of the modified universal adhesive is done according to manufacturer's instructions using a micro-brush. It is actively rubbed for 20 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds then light cured for 20 seconds.
Other Names:
  • 3M ESPE™ Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive
Active Comparator: Carious cervical lesions treated with conventional universal adhesive
Preparation of class V cavity with removal of caries and beveling of margins is done followed by total etching prior to application of conventional universal adhesive. The cavity is then restored with nano-filled resin composite.
Application of the conventional Single Bond Universal adhesive is done using a micro-brush followed by rubbing for 20 seconds, gentle air drying for 5 seconds then light curing for 20 seconds.
Other Names:
  • 3M ESPE™ Single Bond Universal Adhesive

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Marginal adaptation
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal discoloration
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
Post-operative sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
Retention
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
Secondary caries
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Modified Universal Adhesive

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clinical Performance

Clinical Trials on Modified universal adhesive

Subscribe