Validation of the TRAIN-AI for the Risk of HCC Recurrence After Liver Transplantation (TRAIN-AI)

January 23, 2025 updated by: Quirino Lai, European Hepatocellular Cancer Liver Transplant Group

Validation of the TRAIN-AI Score for the Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment option for patients with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1 However, the use of LT depends on maintaining a balance between the risk of post-transplant recurrence or HCC-related death and the equitable distribution of organ donors.2-5 Current selection criteria aim to avoid transplant futility by excluding patients from LT who are at a high risk of tumor recurrence. Selecting patients within the Milan criteria has been shown to provide excellent patient outcomes.6,7 However, these criteria have been challenged by other series showing equivalent outcomes for patients transplanted with a greater tumor burden. A combination of morphologic (i.e., tumor number and size) and biological features has been recently proposed with the intent to implement the patient selection process.8,9 Machine learning represents a statistical tool that can leverage the prognostic abilities of a many clinically available variables. Recently, the TRAIN-AI has been proposed, and a post-transplant HCC recurrence risk calculator using machine learning based on the TRAIN-AI score is available.10 We are seeking to explore the generalizability of this machine learning model to other institutions through a validation study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment option for patients with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1 However, the use of LT depends on maintaining a balance between the risk of post-transplant recurrence or HCC-related death and the equitable distribution of organ donors.2-5 Current selection criteria aim to avoid transplant futility by excluding patients from LT who are at a high risk of tumor recurrence. Selecting patients within the Milan criteria has been shown to provide excellent patient outcomes.6,7 However, these criteria have been challenged by other series showing equivalent outcomes for patients transplanted with a greater tumor burden. A combination of morphologic (i.e., tumor number and size) and biological features has been recently proposed with the intent to implement the patient selection process.8,9 Machine learning represents a statistical tool that can leverage the prognostic abilities of a many clinically available variables. Recently, the TRAIN-AI has been proposed, and a post-transplant HCC recurrence risk calculator using machine learning based on the TRAIN-AI score is available.10 We are seeking to explore the generalizability of this machine learning model to other institutions through a validation study.

Study aims and objective:

The primary objective of this study will be to validate our previously reported TRAIN-AI score using external datasets from other HCC centers.

Study design and methodology:

Validate the TRAIN-AI model by comparing it to other available recurrence risk algorithms on a held-out test set. TRAIN-AI will be compared with Milan Criteria, San Francisco Criteria, Up-to-Seven Criteria, TBS, Metroticket 2.0 Score, HALT-HCC Score, AFP-French model, 5-5-500 Role, NYCA Score, and TRAIN Score.

Study population Adults (≥ 18 years of age) who underwent liver transplant for HCC during the period January 2003 - December 2018.

Inclusion criteria • Patients who underwent liver transplant alone for a diagnosis of HCC. Exclusion criteria

• Patients with incidentally discovered HCC on the explanted liver (i.e. the HCC was not known before the LT)

• Retransplantations or multivisceral transplants

• Patients with tumors other than pure HCC (such as cholangiocarcinoma, mixed HCC-cholangiocarcinoma tumors, fibrolamellar HCC etc.)

Data collection/variables The data required for the analysis are present in the excel spread sheet already sent to the involved centers. The columns in yellow are obligatory for calculating the score.

Data/Statistical analysis:

Data from HCC transplants performed from January 1, 2003 to December 31 2018 will be requested from the invited centers who will obtain them from their records including electronic chart review. The last allowed follow-up of patients included will be December 31, 2023, as this is a retrospective study design. Patient survival will be calculated from the date of LT to patient death (due to any cause). If death does not occur, then the patient will be censored at their last known alive date. The time to recurrence will be calculated from transplantation to the first imaging study (or biopsy if appropriate) that confirmed tumor recurrence. Patient demographics and clinicopathologic characteristics will be described using descriptive statistics using means, medians and proportions, where appropriate. The exact methodology for the calculation of the machine learning-algorithm prediction model, as well the comparisons to previously published models, has been previously outlined in our development cohort study.10 All statistical analyses will be performed using using Python 3.10.1 (libraries: pycox, torch, scikit-learn, and lifelines).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1769

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult (>18 years old) patients listed and transplanted with a primary diagnosis of HCC between January 2003 and December 2018

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible participants were adult patients listed and transplanted with a primary diagnosis of HCC between January 2003 and December 2018.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • incidentally discovered HCC in the explanted liver;
  • retransplantation or multivisceral transplantation;
  • tumors misclassified as HCC on radiological assessment (e.g., cholangiocarcinoma, mixed HCC-cholangiocarcinoma);
  • incomplete data for calculating the TRAIN-AI score.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HCC recurrence
Time Frame: The final follow-up date was December 31, 2023.
HCC recurrence was defined as any hepatic or extra-hepatic tumor reappearance after LT, with recurrence time calculated from LT to detection.
The final follow-up date was December 31, 2023.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Transplantation

Clinical Trials on liver transplantation

Subscribe