Long-term Outcomes of Ablation, Liver Resection, and Liver Transplant as First-line Treatment for Solitary HCC of 3 cm or Less

January 14, 2022 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Long-term Outcomes of Ablation, Liver Resection, and Liver Transplant as First-line Treatment for Solitary HCC of 3 cm or Less Using an Intention-to-treat Analysis: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Curative-intent therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), liver resection (LR), and liver transplantation (LT). Controversy exists in treatment selection for early-stage tumors. We sought to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients who received either RFA, LR, or LT as first-line treatment for solitary HCC ≤ 3cm in an intention-to-treat analysis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

119

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult (≥18 years) patients with solitary HCC ≤ 3cm who underwent either RFA, LR, or were listed for an LT between Feb-2000, and Nov-2018.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (≥18 years) patients
  • Solitary HCC ≤ 3cm
  • Receipt of either radiofrequency ablation, liver resection, or listing for a liver transplant
  • Treatment received between Feb-2000 and Nov-2018

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pathology other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
  • Receipt of prior treatment (i.e., not treatment naive)
  • Not eligible for all of the three treatments (ablation, liver resection, or liver transplant listing)
  • Platelet count <100,000 before treatment
  • Alpha-1 fetoprotein (AFP) level > 1000 before treatment
  • Age > 70 years
  • Child-Pugh score C
  • Esophageal varices grade greater than 2
  • Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score before treatment exceeding 15
  • Presence of ascites pretreatment
  • Presence of encephalopathy pretreatment
  • Spleen size greater than 12 cm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Solitary HCC <= 3 cm
Treatment-naive patients with HCC <= 3 cm
Treatment-naive patients with solitary HCC <= 3 cm who received ablation as the first-line treatment
Treatment-naive patients with solitary HCC <= 3 cm who underwent liver resection as the first-line treatment
Treatment-naive patients with solitary HCC <= 3 cm who were listed for liver transplantation as the first-line treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intention-to-treat (ITT) overall survival
Time Frame: Overall (median length of follow up of entire cohort 6.6 years)
ITT was evaluated from the first treatment modality that was selected for curative intent. In the case of RFA and LR this was recorded as the time of the treatment. In the case of LT, the intention-to-treat was recorded at the time of listing for transplantation. The ITT analysis thus accounted for patients who were placed on the waitlist but dropped out.
Overall (median length of follow up of entire cohort 6.6 years)
Disease-free survival (DFS).
Time Frame: Overall (median length of follow up of entire cohort 6.6 years)
DFS was defined as the time after treatment during which the patient was alive and free of disease. For DFS, patients were censored at recurrence, death, or loss to follow up.
Overall (median length of follow up of entire cohort 6.6 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2000

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are unsuitable to post given that they contain potentially identifiable patient information. Moreover, the research ethics board at the University Health Network has only approved data to be stored and analyzed by the members of the institutional study team to minimize any breach of patient confidentiality.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency ablation

3
Subscribe