Finger Pulse Oximeters in Hosptial Setting

May 20, 2025 updated by: Barts & The London NHS Trust

Evaluating the Accuracy of Commercially Available Finger Pulse Oximeters in a Hospital Setting

Pulse oximetry is a well-established, non-invasive measurement tool used to estimate arterial oxygen saturation. The accuracy of these cheap, readily available finger pulse oximeters has not been robustly assessed in a clinical trial however.

It is vital for clinical practice that this technology is reliable in tracking changes in oxygen saturations at times of ill health as varying physiological parameters may, in theory, contribute to inaccurate readings.

This study will investigate whether these new devices provide a sufficiently accurate measurement of oxygen levels in the blood (when compared to arterial blood gas sampling) to endorse their use in routine hospital practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The investigators propose to assess the margins of agreement between newer commercially available finger pulse oximeters and arterial blood gases in a hospital setting.

Eligible participants requiring blood gas assessment will be identified by members of the clinical team, who will inform the research team investigator. Arterial blood gas sampling is usually performed in patients who are breathless with low oxygen levels.

At the time of arterial blood gas sampling, the three finger pulse oximeters will be placed on each of three fingers of the participant.

The pulse oximeters are small cubic devices, each about the size of a matchbox that sits lightly over the fingernail. Light is emitted from the device and passes through the nailbed.The blood oxygen levels can then be estimated by measuring the absorption of different wavelengths of light. The participant will be asked to remain seated and still for 2mins until steady state is achieved. At this time readings will be taken from each machine.

The contemporaneous measurements of oxygen saturation using gold standard, invasive arterial blood gas sampling and new non-invasive portable pulse oximeters will allow the investigators to evaluate the accuracy of these devices and evaluate their clinical usefulness in the hospital setting.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In hospital patients requiring blood gas sampling (Typically this would represent patients who are complaining of breathlessness or who have low oxygen saturations)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospital inpatients deemed by the clinical team to require arterial blood gas sampling (Typically this would represent patients who are complaining of breathlessness or who have low oxygen saturations)
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to consent (including language barrier)
  • Age <16 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation
Time Frame: Baseline
The handheld pulse oximeters will exhibit a good correlation as evidenced by the Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.75. The cohort patients who were deemed by their treating physician to require an arterial blood gas sample had simultaneous SpO2 readings using 3 pulse oximeters (TempIR-Oxy, Jumper JPD-500A and Nonin Vantage 9590). Data were analysed using Pearson correlation co-efficient (r) and Bland Altman bias plot.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoxia

Subscribe