Prediction of Pulmonary Problems

August 6, 2025 updated by: Zülal TATAR

Prediction of Pulmonary Problems in Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between respiratory muscle strength and grip strength, muscle strength, oxygen saturation of peripheral muscles, dyspnea and respiration, cough, and health-related quality of life in individuals with Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Denizli, Turkey
        • Pamukkale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease follow-up at Pamukkale University Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 individuals diagnosed with RA by the same rheumatologist based on published results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with >10 pack-year smoking history
  • Severe functional limitations
  • Cardiopulmonary and/or neurological disease unrelated to RA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of respiratory muscle strength
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
One of the most commonly used and noninvasive methods for assessing respiratory muscle strength is the measurement of MIP and MEP. Respiratory muscle strength was measured using a portable, electronic, oral pressure measuring device (Micro Medical MicroMPM, UK). These are intraoral pressures measured during maximal inspiration against a valve that closes the airway during maximum inspiration and expiration.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Oxygen Saturation Measurement
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Oxygen saturation measurement was performed with the MOXY (Fortiori Design LLC., Minnesota, USA) device. MOXY is a medical device with dimensions of 61x44x21 mm and a weight of 42 gr. It is an infrared measurement device called "near infrared spectroscopy" that measures oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin in muscle capillaries.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Borg Scale
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Although it is frequently used today to define the severity of exertional dyspnea, it is a scale that can also be used to evaluate the severity of resting dyspnea. It consists of ten items that define the severity of dyspnea according to their degrees. Scoring is done between 0 (not at all) and 10 (very severe).
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
It is a scale based on various physical activities that cause dyspnea. It consists of five items. The patient rates respiratory distress between 0 (no shortness of breath) and 4 (shortness of breath during activities such as being homebound and dressing).
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
It consists of a 100 mm long horizontal line with the words "none" and "very severe" written on one end. The patient marks the severity of the current respiratory distress on the line using these two degrees as criteria. Scoring is done by measuring the marked area with the help of a tape measure.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Leicester Cough Survey
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Measures the effect of cough on quality of life. It consists of 19 questions. It has psychological, social and physical sub-dimensions. The cut-off value of the scale is not defined; low scores indicate greater effect from cough, i.e. worse quality of life. The total severity score ranges from 3 to 21.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
St. George's Respiratory Survey
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
It will be used to evaluate the health-related quality of life of the cases. SGRQ consists of three categories where the symptoms, activities and the effects of the disease on their daily lives are evaluated. The symptoms examined are cough, sputum, wheezing and shortness of breath. Physical functions, housework and hobbies are questioned to determine the activity status. These are activities limited by shortness of breath. The survey consisting of a total of 76 questions is completed in 20 minutes. There is an evaluation scale between zero and 100 points. Zero indicates perfect health status, 100 indicates the worst health status.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Short Form-36 Quality of Life Survey
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Short form-36 is a quality of life scale consisting of 36 items that can be filled by the patient and whose validity and reliability have been shown in studies in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The Turkish version of SF-36 was used in our study. This scale includes 8 separate health-related headings as physical function (10 items), social function (2 items), physical role limitation (4 items), emotional role limitation (3 items), mental health (5 items), vitality (4 items), pain (2 items), general health (6 items).
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Health Assessment Questionnaire
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Since it evaluates activities of daily living comprehensively and in all dimensions, HAQ was preferred in our study to assess the disability level. It includes 20 questions across 8 domains (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities). Each question is scored between 0 and 3 (without any difficulty = 0, with some difficulty = 1, with much difficulty = 2, unable to do = 3). The highest score of each subsection is summed up and divided by 8 to determine the total score between 0 and 3. A high score indicates a low functional level
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Disease Activity
Time Frame: Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.
Disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis will be assessed using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). This index is calculated based on four main parameters: the number of painful joints, the number of swollen joints, the visual analog scale of global disease activity as assessed by the patient, and the visual analog scale of global disease activity as assessed by the physician. CDAI scores of 0-2.8 indicate remission, 2.9-10 indicate low disease activity, 11-22 indicate moderate activity, and 22-76 indicate high activity.
Evaluations started immediately after receiving ethics committee approval and will be completed within 1 months, which is the study period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Subscribe