A Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of SM03 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving MTX

January 7, 2021 updated by: SinoMab BioScience Ltd

A Randomized,Placebo Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SM03, Compared to Placebo, in Patients With Moderate-to-Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

  • To demonstrate that SM03 added to methotrexate (MTX) reduce signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Chinese RA participants with an inadequate response to MTX.
  • To assess the safety of SM03 added to MTX in Chinese RA participants with an inadequate response to MTX

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The total duration of study was expected up to 58 weeks (screening period of 6 weeks, randomized treatment period of 24 weeks and open-label treatment extention period of 24 weeks , and a 4-week post treatment observation).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

510

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100032
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hostipal
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 68 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients 18-75 years of age.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for ≥ 6 months, diagnosed according to the revised 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, or 2010 ACR/EULAR for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Moderate to severe active RA with swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 6(66 joint count), and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 8 (68 joint count) at screening and baseline.
  • At screening, either High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) ≥ 1.5 UNL, or Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 28 mm/hour, or Morning stiffness of joint for ≥ 45 minutes.
  • Inadequate response to methotrexate, having received and tolerated at a dose of 7.5-20 mg/week for ≥ 12 weeks, at a stable dose over the past 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA.
  • Use of any biological DMARDs for RA.
  • Concurrent treatment with any Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) other than methotrexate
  • Active infection, or history of serious or chronic infection

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SM03 600 mg

SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) Randomizd period:on week 0,2,4 and 12,14,16;Participants with inadequate response (defined as less than 10% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC by Week 12) were rescued with open label SM03 600 mg IV treatment.

Open-lable treatment on week 24,30,36,42,48; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.

SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV)
Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16;Participants with inadequate response (defined as less than 10% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC by Week 12) were rescued with open label SM03 600 mg IV treatment.

SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 24,30,36,42,48; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.

SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV)
Placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV)
Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS); Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS); Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3); Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)

Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12,52
Time Frame: Week 12,52

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS); Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS); Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3); Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)

Week 12,52
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50/ACR70 Response at Week 12,24,52
Time Frame: Week 12,24,52

To achieve an ACR50/ACR70 required at least a 50%/70% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 50%/70% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS); Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS); Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3); Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)

Week 12,24,52
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) at Week 12,24,52
Time Frame: Baseline and Week12,24,52

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables:

The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale.

The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6.

Baseline and Week12,24,52
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 12,24,52
Time Frame: Baseline and Week12,24,52

A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS28 score. The DAS28 score ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.

A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2.

A Moderate Response is defined as either:

an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.

No Response is defined as either an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of less than or equal to 0.6, or an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 of more than 5.1.

Baseline and Week12,24,52
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: For Placebo arm: Baseline up to week 24; For SM03 arm: Baseline up to week 52;
Percentage of participants who reported an AE or SAE, a drug-related AE, who had an acute infusion reaction, an AE leading to study drug discontinuation, with an infection or serious infection, or who died.
For Placebo arm: Baseline up to week 24; For SM03 arm: Baseline up to week 52;

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaofeng Zeng, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis(RA)

Clinical Trials on SM03

Subscribe