Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy Versus Autogenic Drainage in Patients With COPD (OPEP-AD-COPD)

February 3, 2026 updated by: Adnan Hashim

Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy Versus Autogenic Drainage in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Effects on Pulmonary Function, Sputum Clearance, Dyspnea, and Quality of Life

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a long-term lung condition that causes breathing difficulty, cough, and sputum production. Airway clearance techniques are commonly used to help reduce symptoms and improve breathing in patients with COPD.

This study compared two airway clearance methods-oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) therapy and autogenic drainage-to determine which method is more effective in improving lung function, sputum clearance, shortness of breath, and quality of life in patients with COPD.

Participants were divided into two groups and received either OPEP therapy or autogenic drainage for four weeks. Outcomes were measured at the beginning of the study and again after completion of the intervention. The findings of this study aim to support evidence-based physiotherapy management for patients with COPD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was a comparative interventional clinical trial conducted to evaluate the effects of oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy versus autogenic drainage in patients diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics review committee prior to study initiation, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Eligible participants with stable COPD were enrolled and allocated into two intervention groups. Baseline assessments were performed prior to the initiation of treatment. Participants in the first group received oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy as part of their airway clearance regimen, while participants in the second group were treated using autogenic drainage techniques. Both interventions were administered over a four-week period.

Outcome measures were assessed at two time points: baseline (pre-intervention) and after completion of the four-week intervention period. Pulmonary function was evaluated using spirometry. Sputum clearance was assessed using the Breathlessness Cough Sputum Scale (BCSS). Dyspnea was measured using the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale, and quality of life was assessed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT).

The results of this study aim to compare the effectiveness of the two airway clearance techniques and provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making in the physiotherapy management of patients with COPD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
        • University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 35 and 50 years
  • Both genders
  • Participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) based on the GOLD 2023 guidelines
  • Clinically stable
  • History of Sputum Culture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute exacerbation of COPD
  • Severe cardiovascular, neurological, or musculoskeletal disorders
  • Recent thoracic or abdominal surgery
  • Presence of other significant respiratory diseases
  • Unwillingness to participate or inability to comply with the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy Group
Participants in this group received oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy as an airway clearance technique for four weeks.
Oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy was administered using a handheld device to facilitate airway clearance by providing expiratory resistance and oscillations during exhalation. The intervention was applied for four weeks.
Active Comparator: Autogenic Drainage Group
Participants in this group received autogenic drainage as an airway clearance technique for four weeks.
Autogenic drainage is a breathing technique involving controlled breathing at different lung volumes to mobilize and clear bronchial secretions. Participants performed autogenic drainage sessions for four weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV₁ % Predicted)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks
Pulmonary function was assessed using spirometry by measuring forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), expressed as percentage of the predicted value, in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Baseline and at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sputum Clearance as Measured by the Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks
Sputum clearance was assessed using the Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS). The BCSS is a patient-reported outcome measure consisting of three items (breathlessness, cough, and sputum), each scored from 0 to 4, resulting in a total score range of 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline and at 4 weeks
Change in Dyspnea Severity as Measured by the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks
Dyspnea severity was assessed using the Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale, a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no breathlessness and 10 represents maximal breathlessness. Higher scores indicate greater perceived dyspnea.
Baseline and at 4 weeks
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time Frame: Baseline and at 4 weeks
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), an 8-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse health status and greater impact of COPD on daily life.
Baseline and at 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adnan Hashim, DPT, Department of Physical Therapy, The University of Lahore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Bridges, C., Graham-Wollard, L., Morris, H., Annandale, J., & Lewis, K. (2023). S56 A feasibility randomised control trial (RCT) of OPEP verses active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
  • Boers, E., Barrett, M., Su, J. G., Benjafield, A. V., Sinha, S., Kaye, L., Zar, H. J., Vuong, V., Tellez, D., Gondalia, R., Rice, M. B., Nunez, C. M., Wedzicha, J. A., & Malhotra, A. (2023). Global Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Through 2050. JAMA Netw Open, 6(12), e2346598. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46598
  • Bishop, K. L., & Malone, D. J. (2024). Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders. In Acute Care Physical Therapy (pp. 245-310). Routledge.
  • Belli, S., Prince, I., Savio, G., Paracchini, E., Cattaneo, D., Bianchi, M., Masocco, F., Bellanti, M. T., & Balbi, B. (2021). Airway clearance techniques: the right choice for the right patient. Frontiers in medicine, 8, 544826.
  • Awokola, B., Amusa, G., Jewell, C., Okello, G., Stobrink, M., Finney, L., Mohammed, N., Erhart, A., & Mortimer, K. (2022). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in sub-Saharan Africa. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 26(3), 232-242.
  • Alruwaili, A. T. S., Alsirhani, A. F., khlaif Alrwili, A., Aldaghmi, M. T. A., Alharbi, S. E. M., & Aldhafeeri, R. Z. (2024). NURSING, PHYSICAL THERAPY, AND RESPIRATORY CARE IN ENHANCING PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION FOR PATIENTS WITH RESPIRATORY DISEASES. Gland Surgery, 9(2).
  • Alghamdi, S. M., Alsulayyim, A. S., Alasmari, A. M., Philip, K. E., Buttery, S. C., Banya, W. A., Polkey, M. I., Birring, S. S., & Hopkinson, N. S. (2023). Oscillatory positive expiratory pressure therapy in COPD (O-COPD): a randomised controlled trial. Thorax, 78(2), 136-143.
  • Adeloye, D., Song, P., Zhu, Y., Campbell, H., Sheikh, A., & Rudan, I. (2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling analysis. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 10(5), 447-458.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 8, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared because this study was conducted as an academic research project. The informed consent obtained from participants did not include provisions for public data sharing, and the dataset contains sensitive personal health information. Data will be stored securely and used only for academic and research purposes in accordance with institutional ethics approval.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Clinical Trials on Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy

Subscribe