ReDS-guided Decongestion Strategy in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure (ReDS-SAFE HF 2)

ReDS-guided Decongestion Strategy in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: the ReDS-SAFE HF II Trial

This clinical trial aims to determine whether a ReDS-guided treatment strategy is superior to the current standard of care for adults hospitalized with heart failure. Additionally, the study will evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

The study seeks to answer the following key questions:

  1. Does the ReDS-guided strategy reduce the risk of cardiovascular events during the first month following hospital discharge?
  2. What is the safety profile of this treatment strategy?

Researchers will compare the ReDS-based strategy against the current standard of care. All participants will:

  • Undergo daily assessments using the ReDS device throughout their hospitalization.
  • Attend two follow-up visits post-discharge, scheduled at 2 weeks and 30 days.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1014

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital del Mar
        • Contact:
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hospital Clinic
        • Contact:
          • Eduard Solé González, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: 34 932 27 54 00
          • Email: edsole@clinic.cat
      • Barcelona, Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Córdoba, Spain
      • Girona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Dr Josep Trueta University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • La Paz University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • 12 de Octubre University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Clínico San Carlos University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Gregorio Marañón University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • La Princesa University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Murcia, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Virgen de la Arrixaca
        • Contact:
      • Málaga, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Salamanca, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca
        • Contact:
      • Sant Joan Despí, Spain
      • Santander, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
        • Contact:
      • Seville, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Virgen de la Macarena University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Tarragona, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Sant Joan XXIII University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Toledo, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hospital General Universitario de Toledo
        • Contact:
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Clínico University Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28034

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Hospitalized due to heart failure as the main reason, including the presence of symptoms and signs of congestion, regardless of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
  2. NT-proBNP greater than 1000 pg/L or BNP greater than 300 pg/L upon admission.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Height less than 150 cm or greater than 190 cm or body mass index (BMI) less than 22 or greater than 39, conditions where the use of ReDS is not approved.
  2. Patients requiring inotropes (levosimendan is allowed) or vasopressors upon admission, with mechanical support, or heart transplant recipients.
  3. Any malformation or variant affecting the right lung anatomy (e.g., a pacemaker).
  4. Patients with any heart disease requiring a planned surgical intervention (CABG, valve disease, or other) or percutaneous (TAVR, STE-ACS, mitral or tricuspid valve repair, CRT) during the clinical trial.
  5. Chronic kidney disease with a GFR <20 or on hemodialysis.
  6. Life expectancy less than 12 months due to non-cardiological origin.
  7. Participation in another clinical trial with intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ReDS-guided strategy
Each day, the clinician responsible for the patient will have access to the ReDS value and will adjust the treatment according to the study's diuretic protocol. The responsible physician can discharge the patient if the clinical stability criteria are met, and the ReDS value is below 35% and a relative reduction of 10% or more from the admission ReDS value has been achieved (i.e. a patient admitted with a ReDS value of 36% should be discharged with a ReDS of 32% at least; or a patient admitted with a ReDS of 34% should be discharged with a ReDS of 31% at least). If the ReDS criteria are not met, the patient should remain hospitalized for another day until these conditions are met. Clinical stability is defined as the presence of at least 2 of the following 3 conditions: i) discharge weight lower than admission weight, ii) at least a 30% reduction in natriuretic peptide from admission, and iii) a score <2 in the Orthoedema score
The ReDS system consists of 2 sensors that are placed (sitting or supine) on the front (infraclavicular) and back (below the scapula) of the patient's right hemithorax and in 45 seconds accurately quantifies the proportion of fluid in the lung. The sensors are connected via 1 cable to a touchscreen monitor that easily guides the measurement process and stores this information. The accuracy of this technology has been validated with high-resolution chest computed tomography and invasive hemodynamic measurements with a Swan-Ganz catheter. Normal ReDS values range between 20% and 35% (i.e., 20-35% of the lung would be fluid). Above 35% is considered congestive, whereas below 20% the lung would be "dry" or dehydrated.
Sham Comparator: Usual clinical practice strategy
The responsible physician will not have access to the ReDS values and will adjust the treatment according to their clinical judgment and local practices. Discharge can be given if the clinical stability criteria are met.
The responsible physician will not have access to the ReDS values and will adjust the treatment according to their clinical judgment and local practices. Discharge can be given if the clinical stability criteria are met.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with an efficacy event at 1 month after discharge
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of follow-up at 1 month after hospitalization discharge
The primary outcome measure is the combined event rate of all-cause mortality, HF readmission, and/or unexpected HF visits requiring diuretic adjustment at 1 month after discharge
From randomization to the end of follow-up at 1 month after hospitalization discharge
Number of participant with a safety event at 1 month after discharge
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of follow-up at 1 month after hospitalization discharge
The primary outcome measure is the combined event rate of symptomatic systolic hypotension (<90 mmHg), electrolyte imbalances (potassium below 3 or above 5.5 meq/L), and/or worsening of renal function compared to the baseline visit at the first post-discharge outpatient visit (at least 50% reduction in glomerular filtration rate).
From randomization to the end of follow-up at 1 month after hospitalization discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-efficacy outcome measure
Time Frame: Length of stay of index admission
Length of stay and cost of ReDS device
Length of stay of index admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 208/24
  • PI24/01541 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Carlos III Institute of Health (Ministry of Science, Innovation and University of Spain))
  • SEC/FEC-INV-CLI 24/17 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Spanish Society of Cardiology)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Heart Failure (AHF)

Clinical Trials on Remote Dielectric Sensing System

Subscribe